A Candle For Remembering
May this memorial candle lights up the historical past of our beloved Country: Rwanda, We love U so much. If Tears could build a stairway. And memories were a lane. I would walk right up to heaven. To bring you home again. No farewell words were spoken. No time to say goodbye. You were gone before I knew it And. Only Paul Kagame knows why. My heart still aches with sadness. And secret tears still flow. What It meant to lose you. No one will ever know.
Why did Kagame this to me?
Can't forget. He murdered my mother. What should be my reaction? FYI: the number of orphans in Rwanda has skyrocketed since the 1990's Kagame's invasion. Much higher numbers of orphans had and have no other option but joining FDLR fighters who are identified as children that have Lost their Parents in Kagame's Wars inside and outside of Rwanda.If someone killed your child/spouse/parent(s) would you seek justice or revenge? Deep insight: What would you do to the person who snuffed the life of someone I love beyond reason? Forgiving would bring me no solace. If you take what really matters to me, I will show you what really matters. NITUTIRWANAHO TUZASHIRA. IGIHE KIRAGEZE.If democracy is to sell one's motherland(Africa), for some zionits support, then I prefer the person who is ready to give all his live for his motherland. Viva President Putin!!!
RPF committed the unspeakable
The perverted RPF committed the UNSPEAKABLE.Two orphans, both against the Nazi world. Point is the fact that their parents' murder Kagame & his RPF held no shock in the Western world. Up to now, the Rwandan Hitler Kagame and his death squads still enjoy impunity inside and outside of Rwanda. What goes through someone's mind as they know RPF murdered their parents? A delayed punishment is actually an encouragement to crime, In Praise of the ongoing Bloodshed in Rwanda. “I always think I am a pro-peace person but if someone harmed someone near and dear to me, I don't think I could be so peaceful. I would like to believe that to seek justice could save millions of people living the African Great Lakes Region - I would devote myself to bringing the 'perp' along to a non-happy ending but would that be enough? You'd have to be in the situation I suppose before you could actually know how you would feel or what you would do”. Jean-Christophe Nizeyimana, Libre Penseur
Hutu Children & their Mums
Look at them ! How they are scared to death. Many Rwandan Hutu and Tutsi, Foreign human rights advocates, jounalists and and lawyers are now on Death Row Waiting to be murdered by Kagame and his RPF death squads. Be the last to know.
Almighty God :Justice for US
Hutu children's daily bread: Intimidation, Slavery, Sex abuses led by RPF criminals and Kagame, DMI: Every single day, there are more assassinations, imprisonment, brainwashing & disappearances. Do they have any chance to end this awful life?
Killing Hutus on daily basis
RPF targeted killings, very often in public areas. Killing Hutus on daily basis by Kagame's murderers and the RPF infamous death squads known as the "UNKNOWN WRONGDOERS"
RPF Trade Mark: Akandoya
Rape, torture and assassination and unslaving of hutu women. Genderside: Rape has always been used by kagame's RPF as a Weapon of War, the killings of Hutu women with the help of Local Defense Forces, DMI and the RPF military
The Torture in Rwanda flourishes
How torture flourishes across Rwanda despite extensive global monitoring
Fighting For Our Freedom?
We need Freedom, Liberation of our fatherland, Human rights respect, Mutual respect between the Hutu majority and the Tutsi minority
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus)and mass arrests of Hutus by the RPF criminal organization =>AS International]
Il y a quelques semaines, dans un titre qui semble décrire assez bien la situation régionale, « Le Rwanda plus fort que jamais en RD Congo malgré la déroute du M23 », le frère Wondo insistait sur quelques points importants dont : (1) la mainmise du Rwanda sur le Congo malgré la déroute militaire du M23, une pure création rwandaise ; (2) depuis vingt ans, la « question rwandaise » reste au cœur de l’instabilité en RDC ; (3) etc. ... Un autre frère venait de "démontrer" que cela risque de prendre trop longtemps pour sortir des griffes du Rwanda quand on considère le pouvoir que détient ARuberwa, le chef récemment nommé de la Pnc, on parle également d'un certain contrôle de l'agence des renseignements par Karahamuheto en plus d'autres structures et, au sommet, la mainmise de Kigali sur la Présidence congolaise...
Il y a plus! Bien que le réchauffement extraordinaire entre le Rwanda et la République du Congo voisin ait inquiété des Hutu qui ont élu domicile dans ce pays depuis l'aventure Afdliène (octobre 1996 à mai 1997), il est logique de considérer que l'activité diplomatique si intense du Rwanda vise à créer et à entretenir un pole de contrôle et/de soutien ou encore de pression sur Kinshasa.
Bien que tous les faits présentés si haut soient presque objectivement vérifiables, la suite de mon raisonnement se formule en une question qui m’est venue à l’esprit, en prenant en considération tout l’environnement où ces évènements prennent place.
D’où la question : Le Rwanda, plus fort?
Tentative de réponse : Oui et Non...
Oui, le Rwanda est plus fort quand on considère le niveau dont il a infiltré, comme le démontre l’auteur, les services de sécurité congolais. À l’extérieur de la RDCongo, le Rwanda s’est montré, depuis l’arrivée du FPR/Inkotanyi au pouvoir, capable d’atteindre ses « cibles » (comprenez « victimes » tel est le mot utilisé par PKagame quand il a parlé de la « trahison de PKaregeya ») partout sur son territoire, dans les pays limitrophes et dans beaucoup d’autres pays lointains.
En RDCongo, le Rwanda ne limite pas son infiltration aux seuls services de sécuritté. Il y a aussi toute la vie civile que les "rwandalisants" veulent contrôler en RDCongo : la haute « administration » publique, des postes ministériels ou quasi-ministériels... Sur ce, vous pouvez prendre en considération le fait que les deux anciens gouverneurs du Sud et du Nord-Kivu sous le RCD, respectivement Katintima et Serufuli, gravitent autour de la présidence. Sans prétendre être exhaustif, citons également LMende, KKMulumba, MNyarugabo, AMRuberwa, EIlunga et tant d’autres plénipotentiaires au pays et à travers le monde. Ceci, malgré que malgré le vote décisif au
Kivu en 2006, lequel avait émasculé le RCD-Rwanda, ait prouvé à la RDCongo et au monde entier que ce mouvement n'avait de base qu’au-delà le lac Kivu. Au Kivu, ces gens sont, politiquement, des étrangers ou des traîtres patentés qui ne peuvent rien attendre de sa population s'elle avait un mot à dire... Quant au « grand jeu » électoral joué par le Cndp (au sein de la « Majorité présidentielle »), la situation spécifique (nomination de sept députés, dont six rwandais) de Masisi l’illustre bien. Jusque là, on aurait pu fermer l’oeil, peut-être! Mais quand la même MP punit par l'emprisonnement un élu du Nord-Kivu qui n'a fait que parler au nom de ses électeurs, on se demande dans quel pays on vit !
C'est ici qu'une intervention des lecteurs de Wondo devient très intéressante. Elle fait poser la question de savoir si le Rwanda, dans « sa force plus que jamais présente en RDCongo malgré la déroute du M23 » ne constitue pas un piège aux stratèges de Kigali qui ne voient pas plus loin que leur nez.
Un évènement récent qui a eu lieu loin de l'Afrique des grands lacs marque ce point de vue: la mort, par assassinat, de l'autre terroriste rwandais, PKaregeya, en Afrique du Sud. Comme moi, le lecteur a appris que l'Ouganda où cet homme est né s'est opposé au rapatriement de son corps quand bien même sa famille restreinte demeure encore dans ce pays... Les uns et les autres ont cherché à expliquer ce refus, la plupart imaginant non sans raison que l’amitié entre Kaguta-Kagame en serait la cause. Mais, nous parlons d'un mort qui ne pouvait plus faire peur à personne (on se serait attendu que, mort ou vivant, son droit de naître « Tutsi ougandais » prime aux égos de nos deux pyromanes)!
Certaines personnes au courant de la situation interne de l’Ouganda disent qu’il y a une cause plus profonde : beaucoup sont ceux, dans ce pays, qui ne veulent plus voir un afflux massif des Tutsi fuyant le Rwanda pour une autre fois.
Quoi ? Fuir le Rwanda, eux qui seraient si forts ?
Rien ne présage un sort, regrettable et de toutes les façons non souhaitable, de cette nature à ces frères et sœurs. D’ailleurs, tout démontre de leur « force de caractère » teintée par la manipulation du haut sommet (voir Kagame’s Historic Speech in Parliament du 4 octobre 2012 ; http://www.newsofrwanda.com/abanyapolitiki/14227/rwanda-exclusive-kagames-historic-speech-parliament/) à la base (penser à la démonstration récente de la dénommée Daphroza Gauthier sur TV24). Pas d’homme ni femme ; rien de ce que les Swahili appellent « Aibu ni nusu ya utu » (un peu de réserve est synonyme d’humanité, de « bantuité ») !
La question se pose cependant : les frères et sœurs Tutsi pourraient-ils quitter forcément le Rwanda à nouveau ? Les chrétiens disent que seul Dieu connaît le futur. Tout le reste n'est que prémonition. Toutefois, il y a quelques faits qui poussent le regard d’un observateur dans ce sens. Nous venions de voir que malgré le retour dans l’Eldorado rwandais, ce pays où coulerait à flot le lait et le miel (igihugu c’ubuki n’amata !) selon un mythe, il est curieux que beaucoup de ces Afande "Tutsi ougandais" continuent, dans leur majorité, à garder leur famille proche en Ouganda où ils ont également tendance à investir (penser aux villas de BNtaganda juste de l’autre côté de la frontière congolaise, proche du Rwanda, mais bien visiblement en Ouganda).
Bien que tous les faits présentés si haut soient presque objectivement vérifiables, la suite de mon raisonnement se formule en une question qui m’est venue à l’esprit, en prenant en considération tout l’environnement où ces évènements prennent place.
D’où la question : Le Rwanda, plus fort?
Tentative de réponse : Oui et Non...
En RDCongo, le Rwanda ne limite pas son infiltration aux seuls services de sécuritté. Il y a aussi toute la vie civile que les "rwandalisants" veulent contrôler en RDCongo : la haute « administration » publique, des postes ministériels ou quasi-ministériels... Sur ce, vous pouvez prendre en considération le fait que les deux anciens gouverneurs du Sud et du Nord-Kivu sous le RCD, respectivement Katintima et Serufuli, gravitent autour de la présidence. Sans prétendre être exhaustif, citons également LMende, KKMulumba, MNyarugabo, AMRuberwa, EIlunga et tant d’autres plénipotentiaires au pays et à travers le monde. Ceci, malgré que malgré le vote décisif au
Kivu en 2006, lequel avait émasculé le RCD-Rwanda, ait prouvé à la RDCongo et au monde entier que ce mouvement n'avait de base qu’au-delà le lac Kivu. Au Kivu, ces gens sont, politiquement, des étrangers ou des traîtres patentés qui ne peuvent rien attendre de sa population s'elle avait un mot à dire... Quant au « grand jeu » électoral joué par le Cndp (au sein de la « Majorité présidentielle »), la situation spécifique (nomination de sept députés, dont six rwandais) de Masisi l’illustre bien. Jusque là, on aurait pu fermer l’oeil, peut-être! Mais quand la même MP punit par l'emprisonnement un élu du Nord-Kivu qui n'a fait que parler au nom de ses électeurs, on se demande dans quel pays on vit !
C'est ici qu'une intervention des lecteurs de Wondo devient très intéressante. Elle fait poser la question de savoir si le Rwanda, dans « sa force plus que jamais présente en RDCongo malgré la déroute du M23 » ne constitue pas un piège aux stratèges de Kigali qui ne voient pas plus loin que leur nez.
Un évènement récent qui a eu lieu loin de l'Afrique des grands lacs marque ce point de vue: la mort, par assassinat, de l'autre terroriste rwandais, PKaregeya, en Afrique du Sud. Comme moi, le lecteur a appris que l'Ouganda où cet homme est né s'est opposé au rapatriement de son corps quand bien même sa famille restreinte demeure encore dans ce pays... Les uns et les autres ont cherché à expliquer ce refus, la plupart imaginant non sans raison que l’amitié entre Kaguta-Kagame en serait la cause. Mais, nous parlons d'un mort qui ne pouvait plus faire peur à personne (on se serait attendu que, mort ou vivant, son droit de naître « Tutsi ougandais » prime aux égos de nos deux pyromanes)!
Certaines personnes au courant de la situation interne de l’Ouganda disent qu’il y a une cause plus profonde : beaucoup sont ceux, dans ce pays, qui ne veulent plus voir un afflux massif des Tutsi fuyant le Rwanda pour une autre fois.
Quoi ? Fuir le Rwanda, eux qui seraient si forts ?
Rien ne présage un sort, regrettable et de toutes les façons non souhaitable, de cette nature à ces frères et sœurs. D’ailleurs, tout démontre de leur « force de caractère » teintée par la manipulation du haut sommet (voir Kagame’s Historic Speech in Parliament du 4 octobre 2012 ; http://www.newsofrwanda.com/abanyapolitiki/14227/rwanda-exclusive-kagames-historic-speech-parliament/) à la base (penser à la démonstration récente de la dénommée Daphroza Gauthier sur TV24). Pas d’homme ni femme ; rien de ce que les Swahili appellent « Aibu ni nusu ya utu » (un peu de réserve est synonyme d’humanité, de « bantuité ») !
La question se pose cependant : les frères et sœurs Tutsi pourraient-ils quitter forcément le Rwanda à nouveau ? Les chrétiens disent que seul Dieu connaît le futur. Tout le reste n'est que prémonition. Toutefois, il y a quelques faits qui poussent le regard d’un observateur dans ce sens. Nous venions de voir que malgré le retour dans l’Eldorado rwandais, ce pays où coulerait à flot le lait et le miel (igihugu c’ubuki n’amata !) selon un mythe, il est curieux que beaucoup de ces Afande "Tutsi ougandais" continuent, dans leur majorité, à garder leur famille proche en Ouganda où ils ont également tendance à investir (penser aux villas de BNtaganda juste de l’autre côté de la frontière congolaise, proche du Rwanda, mais bien visiblement en Ouganda).
L’autre situation illustratrice se situe à Bukavu en 2004. Des puissants « Tutsi congolais » avaient élu domicile à Nguba, un quartier très proche du Rwanda dès la guerre de l’Afdl en 1996. Mais dès la marche victorieuse du général Mbuza sur les hommes de JMutebusi et LNkundamihigo qui occupaient la ville, on n’a plus vu un seul Tutsi, « congolais » eut-il été dans toute la ville de Bukavu. Plus récemment, quelques centaines de familles Tutsi s’étaient emparées de la zone occupée par le M23. Il a même été rapporté qu’il y avait beaucoup de soldats déguisés en civils parmi eux et, en général, le groupe avait été initié au maniement d’armes. Mais dès que les hommes de Mamadou ont commencé leur marche victorieuse sur le M23, on n’a même plus parlé de ces civils. Ils auraient déguerpis durant le processus. Pour dire que le martyr que les troupes rwandaises et alliées font subir à la population est connu et crée, chez ces « Hommes forts » une certaine panique qui les rend, définitivement, faibles. Et le temps travaille contre la force brute qui est la leur.
Il y a un temps, Museveni rêvait de devenir le premier de ces "citoyens à la nationalité sans frontière" à présider la "République Swahili qui irait de l'Atlantique à l'Indien en incluant entre autre les Congos, le Gabon, l'Angola jusqu'à l'Érithrée et la Tanzanie. Hier et, encore aujourd'hui, leur rêve se limite au contrôle de quelques villages dans les Kivu. Mais, là encore, le rêve est lointain!
Quant à la proximité tactique du Rwanda en face de Kinshasa, elle ne peut rien face à un peuple déchaîné. Les centrafricains qui n'ont pas la réputation d'être des grands révolutionnaires ont démontré à la Seleka que, même gagner une guerre contre une armée n'est pas synonyme de gagner la loyauté des citoyens maltraités! Là pourtant, nous avons une lutte interne; nous ne parlons pas d'occupation étrangère. Peu importe la désorganisation temporaire des congolais, rien ne devrait tromper les nigauds quant à notre capacité de nous défendre. La terre de nos ancêtres constituent la première défense sûre.
Enfin, plutôt que de vivre dans ce climat de peur, une RDCongo bien gouverné devrait proclamer une politique de "Regime Change" (changement de régime) face aux deux voisins les plus agressifs. Plutôt que la "Distraction nationale" (comprenez concertations nationales), ceci donnerait de la force combative aux congolais et la détermination pour le succès. Une grande motivation serait au rendez-vous et la RDCongo confronterait ainsi, tête haute, les souteneurs des sous-traitants de notre malheur. Le chantage autour de "génocide rwandais" ne prendrait pas la vedette de l'info régionale à la place de la colère congolaise. Les Fardc ne seraient pas envoyés, avec leur nouvelle capacité, assistée, de frappe contre nos propres jeunes, ceux-là même qui les aidaient alors qu'elles étaient mal prises (ou qu'elles n'existaient pas). On irait même pas contre des "alliés potentiels" comme les Fdlr pour qu'on force le dialogue au pouvoir rwandais extrémiste et sanguinaire. Existe-t-il des Fdlr fautifs, c'est au Rwanda de les juger; il faut qu'ils aillent d'abord au Rwanda.
Merci pour votre temps et votre participation! Un merci particulier au frère qui a initié le partage.
Mastaki Bayange 19 févr. 2014
On Friday, February 7, 2014 6:44:33 AM, Paly wondo <wondo_paly@yahoo.fr> wrote:
Le Rwanda plus fort que jamais en RD Congo malgré la déroute du M23
Par Jean-Jacques Wondo
Défilé triomphal du M23 au stade de Goma, Nov 2012.
La déroute du M23 n’a pas anéanti la mainmise du Rwanda sur le Congo. Le Rwanda demeure toujours plus fort au cœur dispositif sécuritaire congolais malgré la déroute militaire du M23. Depuis la débâcle du M23, une pure création rwandaise, l’on croyait que l’influence rwandaise en RDC allait s’affaiblir, que nenni. Par ses différentes prises de position de ces derniers temps, la dernière en date concerne la nomination du général Tutsi Charles Bisengimana à la tête de la Police nationale congolaise (PNC), le président Kabila renforce l’influence rwandaise au Congo. Il s’agit d’un jeu subtil qui consiste à offrir au Rwanda, via le maillage du dispositif sécuritaire congolais par des agents pro-rwandais, des compensations de l’espace militaire perdu à l’est après la débandade du M23; cela en prévision d’un retour en force du Rwanda par la suite.
Depuis vingt ans, la « question rwandaise » reste au cœur de l’instabilité en RDC. La raison avancée par Kigali pour justifier le déploiement de ses troupes au Congo, de 1996 à 2013, est le risque d’un nouveau génocide que ferait courir au Rwanda la présence au Congo, de FDLR[1].
Le Rwanda plus fort que jamais en RD Congo malgré la déroute du M23
Par Jean-Jacques Wondo
Défilé triomphal du M23 au stade de Goma, Nov 2012.
La déroute du M23 n’a pas anéanti la mainmise du Rwanda sur le Congo. Le Rwanda demeure toujours plus fort au cœur dispositif sécuritaire congolais malgré la déroute militaire du M23. Depuis la débâcle du M23, une pure création rwandaise, l’on croyait que l’influence rwandaise en RDC allait s’affaiblir, que nenni. Par ses différentes prises de position de ces derniers temps, la dernière en date concerne la nomination du général Tutsi Charles Bisengimana à la tête de la Police nationale congolaise (PNC), le président Kabila renforce l’influence rwandaise au Congo. Il s’agit d’un jeu subtil qui consiste à offrir au Rwanda, via le maillage du dispositif sécuritaire congolais par des agents pro-rwandais, des compensations de l’espace militaire perdu à l’est après la débandade du M23; cela en prévision d’un retour en force du Rwanda par la suite.
Depuis vingt ans, la « question rwandaise » reste au cœur de l’instabilité en RDC. La raison avancée par Kigali pour justifier le déploiement de ses troupes au Congo, de 1996 à 2013, est le risque d’un nouveau génocide que ferait courir au Rwanda la présence au Congo, de FDLR[1].
Pour lire la suite, ouvrir le lien suivant : http://desc-wondo.org/strategie-le-rwanda-plus-fort-que-jamais-en-rdc-malgre-la-deroute-du-m23-jj-wondo/
Jean-Jacques Wondo
+32 495 922259
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Saturday, February 15, 2014
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus)and mass arrests of Hutus by the RPF criminal organization =>AS International]
THEY'VE BEEN TRYING TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM THE CIVILIZED WORLD
In "They Think we are stupid !"
But wouldn’t it be terrible if they were mistaken?
Watch out for this Video (All we want is for the truth to finally come out!)
To repeat Kagame's lie and its scenario
about the Rwandan Genocide
is to codify it.
To disparage Rwandans who do question,
is to be complicit in Treason.
Kagame and his protectors spend each year billions of dollars telling the world rubbish and lying about the Rwandan genocide. They want the majority of Rwandans to lose their hope for FREEDOM.
FEAR and TERROR ARE THE TOOLS FOR THE RWANDAN TYRANT.
Friday, February 14, 2014
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus)and mass arrests of Hutus by the RPF criminal organization =>AS International]
THEY'VE BEEN TRYING TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM THE CIVILIZED WORLD
In "They Think we are stupid !"
But wouldn’t it be terrible if they were mistaken?
Watch out for this Video (All we want is for the truth to finally come out!)
To repeat Kagame's lie and its scenario
about the Rwandan Genocide
is to codify it.
To disparage Rwandans who do question,
is to be complicit in Treason.
Kagame and his protectors spend each year billions of dollars telling the world rubbish and lying about the Rwandan genocide. They want the majority of Rwandans to lose their hope for FREEDOM.
FEAR and TERROR ARE THE TOOLS FOR THE RWANDAN TYRANT.
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Citizen confidence in the
judicial system requires that judges, lawyers, court clerks, and others
associated with the judiciary maintain the highest ethical standards.
A common belief is that corruption is a judge taking bribes. The definition exceeds this theory. Corruption describes any organized, interdependent system in which part of the system is either not performing duties it was originally intended to, or performing them in an improper way, to the detriment of the system's original purpose.
Corrupt judicial systems not only violate the basic right to equality before the law but deny procedural rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
While corruption may facilitate criminal enterprise such as drug trafficking, money laundering, and mail fraud.; it is not restricted to these activities. In this country, corruption is so common that it is expected when ordinary businesses or citizens interact with government officials. The end-point of political corruption is a kleptocracy, literally "rule by thieves".
On December 20th Jean Claude I. knows if he can beextradited to Rwanda. He’s accused of being a leader of an armed militia during
the genocide (1994) in Rwanda. He would have hunted down Tutsi’s and he’s
supposed to have committed mass murders in Nyanza and Kigali. Jean Claude was
18 years in 1994.
Jean Claude lost his residence permit two years ago. In March this year
his appeal was judged unfounded. He was arrested in July; Rwanda asked for his
extradition because they see him as an important genocidair. Jean Claude is in
provisional detention. If the judge says he can go to Rwanda because he can
expect a fair trial, he will appeal.
 |
| After the world has found out that Rakia Omaar was the RPF tool To prejuduce Hutus she disappeared. Actually she works for The Somaliland Times ! |
This trial is important. About 20 other Rwandese are accused of being "genocidairs". If Jean Claude can be extradited, they can expect the same fate
even though the Netherlands has no extradition treaty with Rwanda.
Prosecution and defence were very outspoken in court. Prosecution said
Jean Claude was a liar and critized the arguments of the defence: old news from
specialists who were not really specialists. The lawyer of Jean Claude, Michiel
Pestman, told prosecution they were biased and having an agenda of their own.
Because Holland
has invested millions in the Rwandese judicial system, they
could not admit the system was not correct. Also, having a lot of similar cases
of genocide, which are difficult to prove in court, prosecution is trying to
get rid of them through extradition.
Prosecution reacted in a tired way on arguments that should prove a fair
trial in Rwanda is not possible. Manipulation of witnesses, false evidence,
politicisation of trials? It’s known, checked and proven untrue in lots of
court cases, according to prosecution.
They had a difficult moment when defence came with the lying witness in
Canada, July 2013. A Canadian judge discovered discrepancies in his testimony.
He admitted in having lied. He also admitted having lied in a Dutch court.
Specialist Filip Reyntjens is not a real specialist. He’s biased and not
taken very seriously, according to prosecution. His statements as a witness at
the Rwanda tribunal in Arusha (ICTR)
were ignored or hidden in a footnote. But defence said it was Reyntjens himself
who stopped cooperating with the ICTR. Their mandate was not strong enough:
only Hutu’s could be prosecuted, no members of the army of president Kagame.
Pestman told prosecution they were committing character murder of a scientist.
Prosecution used the trial of opposition leader Victoire Ingabire to
show politics doesn’t meddle with trials. There can be held fair trials in
Rwanda. Ingabire was found not guilty on the heaviest charges. And the judge
even said Ingabire could play a positive role in Rwanda after her imprisonment.
Off course not everything is perfect in Rwanda, but there is no such thing as a
perfect country.
Defence talked about the hard conclusion of Amnesty International: the
trial of Ingabire was not fair. According to postman, Ingabire’s trial was a
comedy, which could never be staged in Europe. So why use lower standards for a
trial in Rwanda? Pestman also referred to a letter of Iain Edwards, the English
lawyer of Ingabire. He said her lawyers were harassed, intimidated and were not
always able to hold a cross-examination. Rwanda had given to times over a
guarantee Ingabire’s trial would be fair. Obviously Rwanda had not kept her
promise.
Pestman asked for a postponement of the provisional detention. With an
electronic transmitter around his ankle there should be no risk of an escape.
The judge thought otherwise. She was afraid of an escape and found the
accusations too heavy for a postponement.
Outside court
Behind the battle of lawyers lies a world of misery. Jean Claude’s wife
(J.) lost everything; husband, income, but most of all: safety. ‘They came to
our house very early in the morning to arrest my husband and to search the
house. They made a lot of noise. They scared the hell out of my children. They
were afraid to go back home afterwards and we stayed for three weeks with my
sister. My children are changed. They are withdrawn and silent and are not
doing well at school. That worries me a lot.’
J. speaks Dutch very well. She has an internship; she wants to become a
nurse. With Jean Claude in prison she to get by with the money she gets for her
study, impossible with two children and a baby to be born in February. She’s in
dire straits because she also got a claim from the tax service: because her
husband is illegal, she has to pay back around 11.000 euro.
The couple met in Kinshasa. Jean Claude was a representative of the
Rwandan community and was often at the refugee office. They got married in
Kinshasa. J. and her sister moved to Norway in 2002, she was pregnant of her first
child. Jean Claude went on invitation to The Netherlands in 2003. J: ‘We went
to different countries because that was better considering our different
procedures. When my daughter became one year old, I went to Holland as well.’
Jean Claude became a plumber, but could no longer do his work because of
a bad back. He wanted to become a security officer, got a certificate, but was
never employed. J: ‘I don’t know why. There were some problems, but they never
told us which problems.’
In 2012 Jean Claude starts working as a cab driver. J: ‘He needed an
affidavit of good conduct and got one. Very strange considering the situation
he was in.’
J. doesn’t know what she’ll do when her husband has to go back to
Rwanda. ‘He taught me to laugh, to live. When I met him I had no real wish to
live. I had seen so much. I became an orphan when I was four. My sisters
and I had to go to an orphanage. We were there when the bombs started falling.
We had to flee for the soldiers of the RPF. We saw a lot of dead people. A lot of
blood. We started with 800 children, in the end we were with 200. I took care
of a four-year-old girl. I carried her on my back, but one day she died. I was
very sorry because I was used to her and she had such a beautiful smile. But I
couldn’t help her. I was so tired.’
J. compares herself with a caged animal. ‘We have no money; I cannot
work, because I have to be home for my children. In February I’ll have a new
baby. We cannot go to Rwanda. I’ll die there.’
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Monday, February 10, 2014
By Daya Gamage - Asian Tribune News Analysis
Washington, D.C. 12 January (Asiantribune.com):
The United States' Global war crimes investigator Ambassador Stephen Rapp, head of the State Department's Office of Global Criminal Justice, was in Sri Lanka last week on a fact finding mission in preparation of the UN Human Rights Commission session this March which will scrutinize Sri Lanka's military engagement during the final months of its battle with separatist Tamil Tigers.
Ambassador Stephen Rapp
Ambassador Stephen Rapp
Mr. Rapp released a bombshell using Colombo's American Embassy Twitter Account to post in its web portal identifying an area as the location that Sri Lanka military used it firepower to kill thousands of Tamil civilians during those final battle with the LTTE.
This statement in the official American Embassy web portal was in fact a declaration that Sri Lanka committed war crimes and genocide.
Ambassador Rapp's visit comes ahead of the UN Human Rights Council Session due in early March in which the United States is expected to move a resolution on Sri Lanka possibly asking for an international probe.
Mr. Rapp used ambiguous and conflicting information and data to accuse Sri Lanka of violating International Humanitarian Laws (IHL) in a report released to the US Congress in October 2009 about the military battle between the government forces and the Tamil Tiger fighting cadre during final - January to May 2009 - stages of the Eelam War 4.
Ambassador Stephen Rapp undertook his official tour in Sri Lanka in search of answers to what happened during those five months and the government's accountability and reconciliation process with a very heavy baggage;his own culpability of covering-up Rwanda's 1994 genocide as an attempt to white-wash the United States involvement in that episode as the Chief Prosecutor of the United Nations-appointed International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda (ICTR).
In October 1990, the Ugandan army and the Rwandan Patriotic Front/Army (RPF) led by Major General Paul Kagame (who is now the president of Rwanda) invaded Rwanda from Uganda. The guerrillas who violated international laws and committed massive war crimes were backed by Britain, Belgium, the United States and Israel, according to many investigators and researchers. By July 1994, the RPF completed its coup d'etat and consolidated its power in Rwanda.
On April 6, 1994, the governments of Rwanda and Burundi were decapitated when the plane carrying the two presidents and top military staff was shot down over Kigali, Rwanda's capital.
The well-planned assassinations of Juvenal Habyarimana and Cyprien Ntaryamira sparked a massive escalation of warfare that is falsely portrayed as the result of meaningless tribal savagery. These assassinations were major war crimes, and the RPF was largely responsible, but almost every attempt to honestly investigate the double presidential assassinations has been blocked by the U.S. and its allies.
Professor Peter Erlinder, of the William Mitchell College of Law in Pennsylvania (USA) who was very much involved in defending some at the ICTR which was functioning in Arusha in Tanzania has come out with an array of evidence and interpretations of the direct culpability of the current Rwandan president Paul Kagame in the Rwandan genocide, how he and his colleagues were given military training in the U.S., how Kagame as the head of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), a proxy force of the Pentagon according to Erlinder, invaded Rwanda to unleash a genocide with tacit approval of the United States, and in the following years how the United States took covert and overt steps to cover up its involvement in the Rwandan mass massacre.
It is here that Ambassador-at Large Stephen Rapp's name emerge. Mr. Rapp who was in Sri Lanka last week and also in 2012 as the head of the State Department's Office of Global Criminal Justice, in his previous position as the chief prosecutor of the Rwandan genocide, according to Peter Elinder, and many other investigators, was one of the main person who was involved in the cover up of US involvement in the Rwandan Genocide.
Prof. Elinder outlined the United States endeavor in the cover up of its own culpability in the Rwandan genocide, and the role played by Stephen Rapp as the Chief Rwanda Prosecutor of the United Nations.
He said: "The July 9, 2009 New York Times reported that the Obama administration had selected Stephen Rapp to replace the Bush administration Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes, Pierre Prosper. Rapp began his international career at the UN Security Council Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in 2001, while Carla Del Ponte was Chief Rwanda Prosecutor. Rapp's nomination just a few months after Del Ponte's of her memoir of her years as Chief UN Prosecutor, Madam Prosecutor: Confronting Humanity's Worst Criminals and the Culture of Impunity was published in English.
"Del Ponte's book describes in detail the systematic U.S.-initiated cover-up of crimes by the current Rwandan government, a U.S. ally, committed during the Rwanda Genocide, and how she was removed from her ICTR (International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda) position in 2003 by U.S. Ambassador Prosper, himself, when she refused to cooperate with the U.S.-initiated "cover-up."
According to Del Ponte, her ICTR Office had the evidence to prosecute Kagame for "touching-off" the Rwanda Genocide by ordering the assassination of Rwanda's former President Juvenal Habyarimana, long before 2003.
She also details the dozens of massacre sites, involving thousands of victims, for which the current Rwandan President, Paul Kagame and his military, should be prosecuted. The well-publicized canard, that "the identity of the assassins of Habyarimana is unknown" is a bald-faced lie, well -known by ICTR Prosecutors, according to Ms. Del Ponte, writes Prof. Elinder in a popular/well read web site Global Research.
Two years after Del Ponte was removed from office, Stephen Rapp became "Chief" of ICTR Prosecutions with access to all of the evidence known to Ms. Del Ponte, and more that has been made public in the past few years. During his four years at the ICTR, Ambassador Rapp like Del Ponte, also was in a position to prosecute Kagame and members of the current government of Rwanda but, not one member of Kagame's military has been prosecuted at the ICTR, to date...and the "cover-up" revealed by Del Ponte, continues today. And, unlike, Ms. Del Ponte, who was fired by the U.S., Mr. Rapp was first rewarded with an appointment as Chief Prosecutor at the U.S.-funded Sierra Leone Tribunal and now, a coveted ambassadorship by the Obama administration as the chief of the Office of Global Criminal Justice at the United States Department of State.
In February 2009, the ICTR issued its Judgment the Military-1 case, that main case at the ICTR, in which Mr. Rapp personally appeared for the Prosecution. Although massive violence did occur in Rwanda, the court certainly recognized that blaming only one side WAS a falsehood, when it acquitted all of the "architects of the killing machine" (as Mr. Rapp called the defendants in court) of conspiracy or planning to kill civilians. The highest ranking military-officer was acquitted of all charges.
And, although it is now clear from Ms. Del Ponte's memoirs that Mr. Rapp had the evidence to clear the ICTR defendants of the assassination charges and only the losing side has been blamed for all crimes committed in Rwanda in 1994. Simply put, Mr. Rapp and other ICTR prosecutors have withheld evidence that would be beneficial to the defense, contrary to Tribunal Rules; have prosecuted defendants for crimes they knew were committed by Kagame's forces; and, have created a system of "judicial impunity" that has permitted Kagame to kill millions in the eastern Congo.
It is in this context that Prof. Peter Elinder writing to Global Security questioned President Obama's wisdom in appointing Stephen Rapp as the head of the Office of War Crimes Issue (as was known before) at the State Department in this manner: "This 'inconvenient-African-truth,' raises an uncomfortable question regarding President Obama's nomination of Mr. Rapp, in the first place: Are Obama and his advisors ignorant of the public record regarding Rapp's complicity in the ICTR Cover-up....or do they just not give a damn?"
Ambassador Stephen Rapp was also privy to the following information when he was the Chief Prosecutor of the ICTR:
Ambassador Stephen Rapp was also privy to the following information when he was the Chief Prosecutor of the ICTR:
The US Ambassador to Rwanda, and declassified US documents from 1994, establish that:
(a) the assassination of the President of Burundi in October 1993 triggered a "genocide of 150,000 Burundian Hutus;"
(b) hundreds of thousands of Burundian Hutu refugees then poured into Rwanda;
(c) Rwandan Patriotic Front military aggression displaced 1.5 million Rwandans in early 1993; and
(d) the Rwandan Patriotic Front assassinated the Presidents of Rwanda and Burundi in April 1994.
And, that these were the actual causes of the Rwanda Genocide.
The U.S. Ambassador to Rwanda personally warned Kagame in November 1993 that, if he resumed the war, he would be responsible for mass violence in Rwanda in 1994, like that in Burundi in 1993. This was confirmed by cables from the State Dept on April 7, 1994;
UN documents show that the RPF was militarily dominant as of February 1993 and, according to UN Gen. Dallaire's cables to the UN in April-June 1994, Kagame refused to stop the violence because he was winning;
Former ICTR Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte's 2009 memoirs document then–Gen. Kagame's culpability for the assassination of the Presidents of Rwanda and Burundi of April 6, 1994 that began the Rwandan Genocide, as does the 2008 indictment issued by Spanish Judge Fernando Abreu Merelles and the 2006 indictment of French Judge Jean-Louis Bruguière;
The Spanish indictment also describes, prefecture-by-prefecture, 325,000 murders of Hutus and Tutsis for which Kagame and the RPF are responsible, not including the massive killing after 1994, in both Rwanda and neighboring Congo;
In 2009 published Edward S. Herman and David Peterson's investigative/research book The Politics of Genocide said: "The United States and its allies worked hard in the early 1990s to weaken the Rwandan government, forcing the abandonment of many of the economic and social gains from the social revolution of 1959, thereby making the Habyarimana government less popular, and helping to reinforce the Tutsi minority's economic power. Eventually, the RPF was able to achieve a legal military presence inside Rwanda, thanks to a series of ceasefires and other agreements. These agreements led to the Arusha Peace Accords of August 1993, pressed upon the Rwandan government by the United States and its allies, called for the "integration" of the armed forces of Rwanda and (Kagame's) RPF, and for a "transitional," power-sharing government until national elections could be held in 1995. These Peace Accords positioned the RPF for its bloody overthrow of a relatively democratic coalition government, and the takeover of the Rwandan state by a minority dictatorship."
The chief of the U.S. State Department's Office of Global Criminal Justice Stephen Rapp knew this entire Rwandan episode, the U.S. interests in Paul Kagame, the UN concealment of the 1994 report at the behest of the Clinton administration, the U.S. military assistance to Kagame's Rwandan Patriotic Front and the entire exercise of the 'Rwandan cover up' to conceal the U.S. culpability in the Rwandan genocide when he focused his attention elsewhere; Sri Lanka.
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Friday, February 7, 2014
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus)and mass arrests of Hutus by the RPF criminal organization =>AS International]
YEARS,
THEY'VE BEEN TRYING TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM THE
CIVILIZED WORLD
In "They Think we are stupid !"
But wouldn’t it be terrible if they were
mistaken?
Watch out for this Video (All we want is for the truth
to finally come out!)
To repeat Kagame's lie and its scenario
about the Rwandan Genocide
is to codify it.
To disparage Rwandans who do question,
is to be complicit in Treason.
Kagame and his protectors spend each year billions of dollars telling
the world rubbish and lying about the Rwandan genocide. They want the majority
of Rwandans to lose their hope for FREEDOM.
FEAR and TERROR ARE THE TOOLS FOR THE RWANDAN TYRANT.
Saturday, February 1, 2014
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus)and mass arrests of Hutus by the RPF criminal organization =>AS International]
All we want is for the Truth to finally
come out from the darkness
Bernard Lugan présente "Rwanda, un génocide en... par BernardLugan
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)
AS International
SurViVors SPEAK OUT - Rights of Victims Seeking Justice and Compensation for the RPF Genocide. This is an Exciting Collaborative Project launched by The AS International Founder Jean-Christophe Nizeyimana, Economist and Human Rights Activist. Join US and Be the First to know about the Mastermind of the Rwandan Genocide Still At large and enjoing Impunity.