Monday, December 8, 2014

LETTER FROM THE NORTH: HOW EMILE GAFIRITA WAS ABDUCTED BY PAUL KAGAME’S OPERATIVES.‏

[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus)and mass arrests of Hutus by the RPF criminal organization =>AS International]

By now, all Rwandans know that the Juvenal Habyarimana assassination dossier is considered as a toxic dossier. It’s a toxic dossier to the extent that criminal Paul Kagame will at most; assassinate anyone who comes out to implicate him in the assassination of Juvenal Habyarimana. Most of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPA) operatives who took part in the operation to shoot down the plane carrying Juvenal Habyarimana are now dead through well planned systematic assassinations.

All the individuals that were named by various sources in the shooting down of the Juvenal Habyarimana’s plane came from Kagame’s elite section; these individuals that included Eric Hakizimana, Stevens Twagira, Peter Sempa, Andrews Nyavumba, and Alphonse Kayumba, were all members of the ‘Missiles Section’ under the hit squad team commanded by Lt Franck Nziza (Now Colonel). Within this section that was used to shoot down the Habyarimana Plane, it is only Colonel Franck Nziza and Major Eric Hakizimana that are still alive, as the rest of the group members have been eliminated.

Emile Gafirita wearing RDF uniform.

A long the way Paul Kagame has assassinated all those officers that have sufficient and efficient information in the shooting down of the Habyarimana’s plane; starting with the assassination of Colonel Lizinde Theoneste, Captain Herbert Kamugisha who was the head of RPA’s intelligence group at CND, Col Steven Ndugute, Col Patrick Karegeya, Col. Charles Ngoga, Abdul Joshua Ruzibiza etc. Anyone who tried to deviate from Kagame’s line of narrative which is full of fabricated lies; the criminal makes sure you don’t exist in this world and this is the same fate that has met the recent witness.

Flash Back

I would like to admit to Ikaze Iwacu readers that I am not a keen user of Facebook and when I use it, it’s only to communicate with friends, relatives, former school/university friends. After receiving reliable information from a DMI cyber operative, confirming to Ikaze Iwacu thatEmile Gafirita was using the Facebook nickname of Ruvunamacumu Ashire, and this facebook page was the first insight that brought Emile Gafirita to the attention of DMI operatives and most especially Paul Kagame. But In trying to analyse the Emile Gafirita issue, the research took me to unfamiliar territory, a place that left me shocked but at the same time impressed at how Rwandans are battling Kagame’s ideologues in the social media, especially on Facebook.

The research helped me to realise why criminal Paul Kagame through death merchant Jack Nziza created a social media team that is now based in Kagugu-Kigali. The most fascinating analysis is how Kagame’s cyber team lacks intellectual facts, logic and analysis. In other words, they are a group of paid mercenaries with nothing to say or defend; but I can impartially admit that, they possess excellent dialect in the field of insults, abuses and they all sing the same lyrics like parrots.

How Ruvunamacumu Ashire was tracked to Uganda in 2013

According to our reliable DMI operative, the blogger by the name of Ruvunamacumu Ashirewas a headache to criminal Paul Kagame. Rwandans should know that criminal Paul Kagame is hooked and addicted to social media; he has created Facebook accounts with pseudo names to see, read and react to comments that opposition members are writing and posted about him. Paul Kagame put immense pressure to his operatives to find the real person behind Ruvunamacumu Ashire, as he was disturbed with Ashire’s feeds especially detailing Paul Kagame’s killings and cowardice especially during the RPA/RPF war. According to this reliable DMI cyber operative, they uncovered the IP internet addresses that were used to run Ruvunamacumu Ashire, and all came from Uganda. This is when the DMI cyber team briefed and transferred the Ruvanamacumu Ashire dossier to DMI chief, death merchant Jack Nziza.

Paul Kagame’s assassins led by Lt. Col. Burabyo James tries to kidnap Emile Gafirita from Uganda in 2013

After identifying that the runner of the Ruvunamacumu Ashire lives in Uganda, death merchant Jack Nziza passed the dossier of tracking the blogger Ruvunamacumu Ashire to his trusted assassin Lt. Col. Burabyo James. Rwandans should know that Lt. Col. Burabyo James is Rwanda’s military attaché to Uganda. Lt. Col. Burabyo, who is half Rwandan, as his father is Ugandan, is one of the top assassins within RPF’s terrorist organisation.

After receiving the dossier from death merchant Jack Nziza, Lt. Col. Burabyo approached Ugandan’s CMI operatives who are under Kigali’s pay role for the help. These CMI operatives contacted their colleagues who work within internet providers like Tigo Uganda and MTN Uganda, to try and retrieve any information on the IP addresses that have ever been used by Ruvunamacumu Ashire. Ikaze Iwacu readers should know that CMI means chieftaincy of military intelligence which is equivalent to Rwanda’s deadly DMI. These paid CMI operatives turned up with a name of an e-mail address that has constantly appeared in all these different IP addresses.

It is this e-mail address that led Lt. Col. Burabyo James directly to Emile Gafirita; this is when DMI operatives started trailing him. While in Uganda, Emile Gafirita was always involved in small businesses and not doing anything out of the odds. He never at any day commented, debated or discussed about the Rwandan politics. The mare fact of being a suspect made Kagame’s assassins to try to kidnap him.

A very reliable DMI personnel who is conversant with this dossier told Ikaze Iwacu that on the 31st -08-2013, while at Najjanakumbi pub, a group that involved John Ngarambe and Corporal Rene Rutagungira tried to kidnap Emile Gafirita. By this time, Emile did not know that he was under the surveillance of Rwanda’s DMI. Emile Gafirita who was in company of Ugandan friends fought off Kagame’s assassins to the point that Rene Rutagungira sustained an eye injury, as these assassins fled the scene. Rwandan’s should be reminded that Rene Rutagungira is a DMI operative who operates in Uganda and he was also involved in the assassination of Charles Ingabire the former editor of Inyenyeri news.

The relocation of Emile Gafirita to Nairobi, Kenya

After the Najjanakumbi Pub incident, friends advised Emile Gafirita to relocate to another country and lay low. This is when he decided to relocate to Nairobi Kenya. Our reliable DMI informer told Ikaze Iwacu that after the Najjanakumbi incident, the blogger Ruvunamacumu Ashire also stopped posting on his facebook account, and this made death merchant Jack Nziza and his criminal boss Paul Kagame to categorically confirm that Ruvunamacumu Ashire was Emile Gafirita. To these criminals, it was not coincidence but an affirmation that Emile Gafirita was linked to Ruvunamacumu Ashire.

According to this DMI operative, it was after the death of Col Patrick Karegeya, that Ruvunamacumu Ashire started again to post feeds on facebook. But, this time with vengeance and more revealing information that attacked and touched the RPF’s terrorist organisation and its criminal leader Paul Kagame. By this time, Ruvunamacumu Ashire’s facebook account was operating from three different IP addresses spanning in three different countries of America, Belgium and Kenya.

At the beginning of this year, Paul Kagame’s DMI operatives were busy and involved with other immediate issues in Burundi, DR Congo, Tanzania, South Africa, Europe, America and Rwandans inside the country were also starting to voice their opinions. Therefore, the issue of Ruvunamacumu Ashire was shelved by DMI as he was not an immediate concern for the system; but his dossier was transferred to Peter Matsiko in Nairobi; for locating his where about.

Who leaked Emile Gafirita’s name, to Rwanda’s murderous regime?

At the beginning of August 2014, Marc Trévidic and Nathalie Poux came out to announce in public that they will be re-opening the Habyarimana plane crash investigation, as there is new and important information from a very reliable individual. Marc Trevidic and Natalie Poux came short of naming that individual. When Paul Kagame heard that there is a new witness and the witness is not from his side of camp; a very panicky Paul Kagame instructed his criminal deputy, Jack Nziza, to investigate at all cost and find the real identity of this new witness.

Olivier Kayumba

This is when Jack Nziza instructed Olivier Kayumba, Rwanda’s 1st secretary to France and head of external DMI in France, to try and find out the real identity of this individual. Our reliable informer, continuous to tell Ikaze Iwacu that it took Olivier Kayumba just less than a weak to identify this individual, and this DMI operative affirms that “there is no way Olivier Kayumba would get that sensitive information without the help of someone within Marc Trévidic and Nathalie Poux’s office. This high quality intelligence must have been provided by someone in their office who is close to Kagame’s regime and his spy network.”

Olivier Kayumba informed his boss Jack Nziza the real identity of the new witness and this witness was Emile Gafirita. Criminal Paul Kagame was briefed about the development, and that is when he ordered Jack Nziza to kidnap Emile Gafirita for enhanced interrogation, and learn on what he has already talked to the French Judiciary, who may have encouraged him to come out after all these years and if he had contacts withAbdul Joshua Ruzibiza before his death.

Peter Matsiko

A special team led by Col Franco Rutagengwa heads to Nairobi

By this time, death merchant Jack Nziza briefed Captain Peter Matsiko who is Rwanda’s embassy first secretary in Kenya and a very seasoned DMI operative. He was briefed about the impending situation and the Captain assured Jack Nziza that he knows the real address of Emile Gafirita, the address which he had attained in previous investigations on him in relation to his blogging work. Captain Peter Matsiko was instructed to set all the logistics for his kidnaping.Peter Matsiko

Ikaze Iwacu readers should know that Captain Peter Matsiko is a seasoned and a notorious DMI operative. Our informer also told Ikaze Iwacu that, “Like his boss Jack Nziza, Peter Matsiko is also 100% Umufumbira from Kisoro in Uganda.” A three car convoy led by Col Franco Rutagengwa left Kigali on the 12th-11-2014 bound for Kenya, making a stopover in Kampala to pick Lt. Col Burabyo James and Corporal Rene Rutagungira. This squad of criminal Paul Kagame’s killers arrived in Nairobi on the 14th-11-2014. They were housed in a leafy mansion situated in Embakasi suburb of Nairobi and owned by a Somalian businessman.

Our reliable DMI informer told Ikaze Iwacu that this Somali businessman is named/calledDaahir Abdullahi who is Kenyan by birth. But Rwanda’s DMI operatives nicknamed him Farrah Aidid; this man knows all the DMI killings in Nairobi. He is the point of contacts for DMI operatives in Nairobi, as he provides them with transport, weapons and he is the one who corrupts Kenyan officials on behalf of Rwanda/DMI. This mansion house at Embakasi, was then used as operation centre by these DMI agents led Col Franco Rutagengwa.

Mr Emile Gafirita was kidnapped on his way home after meeting a supposed Burundian “friend,” but at this time, this friend had also been bought by Captain Peter Matsiko to lure him in an area that will be easy for his kidnapping. The Rwandan DMI avoided causing mayhem in the streets of Nairobi; they let a group assembled by this Somalian Businessman to kidnap him and then handed to Franco Rutagengwa’s group; that is what really happened on this fateful day of 19th/11/2014.

According to this reliable DMI operative, Emile Gafirita was held at this mansion owned by the Somalian businessman; as this businessman was planning through corrupting Kenyan officials on how Emile Gafirita can be sneaked out of the country. On the 22nd-11-2014 that is when Col Franco Rutagengwa and his group left Nairobi; and on the 23rd-11-2014 Emile Gafirita was delivered to criminal Paul Kagame.

Our reliable DMI informant told Ikaze Iwacu that Emile Gafirita is currently being held at Gako military detention centre, where he is going through vigorous torture and questioning. This officer told Ikaze Iwacu that “Emile Gafirita will meet the same fate like Aime Ntabana. He will be tortured for information and after seeing that he has nothing to tell, he will then be disposed/killed.”

Conclusion?

Judge Marc Tredivic

Criminal Paul Kagame will be responsible for Emile Gafirita’s death, but the French judgesMarc Trévidic and Nathalie Poux bare the largest responsibility for telling the world that“there is a new individual of interest with substantial information in regard to the shooting down of Habyariman’s plane.” These judges went public with this information without setting any protection mechanisms for their witness. The most disturbing development is that the name leak of Emile Gafirita came from their office. Are these judges under criminal Paul Kagame’s pay check????

A note of warning

I would like to warn Major Micombero Jean Marie to be careful as criminal Kagame’s DMIs are encircling on him. As a person who has information on the shooting down of Habyarima’s plane, you’re a target in front of RPF’s criminal’s enterprise. Being also death merchant Jack Nziza’s number one enemy, this puts your name on the top of people to be eliminated.

By Our Correspondent

Ikazeiwacu.fr

The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine

Sunday, December 7, 2014

Rwandans protest Dutch support for Kagame dictatorship

by Ann Garrison

[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus)and mass arrests of Hutus by the RPF criminal organization =>AS International]

Many marchers held banner images of Rwandan political prisoner Victoire Ingabire. Others wore windbreakers of pink and orange, the colors worn by Rwandan prisoners, over heavy winter clothes. After watching the video of the demonstration, I spoke to Jean Flammé, a Belgian attorney for a Rwandan facing extradition for supporting Victoire Ingabire.

San Francisco Bay View/Ann Garrison: Jean Flammé, I know that the Rwandan government accuses those Rwandans facing extradition from the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe of genocide crime after they’ve spoken out against the Rwandan government, so the threat of being charged with genocide crime by the Rwandan government basically serves as a gag order.

Could you say something about how your work as a defense attorney at the International Criminal Tribunal on Rwanda informs your work in defense of Rwandans facing extradition?

Jean Flammé: I defended a Rwandan facing extradition before a Dutch court in The Hague, and one thing I said was that there had not been a genocide. According to international law on genocide, as defined by the U.N. Convention on Genocide, there had not been a genocide, because the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) ruled again and again that there was no evidence of a plan or conspiracy to eliminate Rwandan Tutsis. Not a single defendant was convicted of “conspiracy to commit genocide” because there was no evidence of conspiracy.

I also explained that another reason why the Rwandan tragedy was more accurately described as mass killing, not genocide, was because the killing was not aimed at one single group, being the Tutsi, as is commonly accepted. Indeed, at least as many Hutu as Tutsi were massacred.

Bay View: But the U.N. Tribunal, the ICTR, just ignored the U.N.’s own definition of the crime of genocide, didn’t it? Didn’t it hand down convictions for “genocide,” even though a defining element of the crime – planning and “intent” – was never proven?

The Rwandan government accuses those Rwandans facing extradition from the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe of genocide crime after they’ve spoken out against the Rwandan government, so the threat of being charged with genocide crime by the Rwandan government basically serves as a gag order.

Jean Flammé: The ICTR ruled that there had been a genocide without previous planning, which is theoretically possible if one establishes the intent to destroy a group, as defined by the U.N. Convention. But how could such a common intent exist on such a scale without planning, and the court ruled that planning had not occurred?

Bay View: So what happened when you told the judge that in the extradition case there had been no genocide, despite the ICTR rulings?

Jean Flammé: The judge just looked at me as if I were from another planet or something. “No genocide? What is he saying? It is a known fact that there has been a genocide.” And then it started to become very difficult, as it always does, because of course it has been indeed generally accepted not only by the press but also by the ICTR.

Although there are so many arguments to say no, there had not been a genocide; there had been a civil war, which would be totally different of course. The violence exploded because of the invasion of the country by the Rwandan Patriotic Front in October 1990, and the war it waged for the next three and a half years. Bernard Lugan explains this exactly in his book, and so does Professor Peter Erlinder.

Bay View: Well, it would be a qualified civil war because it began when troops invaded from Uganda with Ugandan weapons.

Flammé: And American weapons.

Bay View: Yes, and American weapons. Do you have an outcome for that extradition trial yet?

Flammé: Well, the judges have denied what we told them and approved the extradition, so now it’s before the high court, the Dutch Supreme Court.

Bay View: So you are defending this case in The Netherlands?

Flammé: Yes, the Dutch lawyers asked me to support them.

The case is Mugimba, Jean Baptiste Mugimba. He was supporting Victoire Ingabire. He had organized a group in Holland to support Ingabire’s attempt to be allowed to run for president in Rwanda in 2010 and then to free her from prison, where she has been since October 2010.

So I told the court, “Look, this man is in front of you because of what he did for Victoire Ingabire. And Holland should know what’s happening to that very brave woman. And this is the reason why they want him.”

And I even told them, “Look, the death penalty doesn’t exist in Holland anymore, but if you send this man to Rwanda, you send him to his death and it will be the death penalty.”

“Look, this man is in front of you because of what he did for Victoire Ingabire. And Holland should know what’s happening to that very brave woman. And this is the reason why they want him.”

Bay View: In Rwanda, they don’t have the death penalty legally, but bodies keep floating down the river into Burundi.

Flammé: That’s what I mean, yes. People disappear, and even get killed. Also in Belgium, there was a gentleman who died, who was found in the river with his arms cut off. His mutilated body was found in the river.

Bay View: Was this a Rwandan?

Flammé: Yes.

Bay View: And when did that happen?

Flammé: It happened in Brussels, about two, three years ago.

Bay View: Jean Flammé, thanks for speaking to the SF Bay View.

Flammé: My pleasure.

Oakland writer Ann Garrison contributes to the San Francisco Bay View, Counterpunch, Global Research, Colored Opinions, Black Agenda Report and Black Star News and produces radio news and features for Pacifica’s WBAI-NYC, KPFA-Berkeley and her own YouTube Channel. She can be reached at anniegarrison@gmail.com. If you want to see Ann Garrison’s independent reporting continue, please contribute on her website, anngarrison.com.

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Breaking neuws: A Must See : RWANDA'S UNTOLD STORY that Leads Necessary to RETHINKING RWANDA

Stephen Sackur talks to Rwanda's president, Paul Kagame, The Rwandan Genocide mastermind

Kagame Hard Talk Video par Paul899

The killing Fields - Part 1

The killing Fields - Part1- Meilleur résolusion par xiao_wuu

The killing Fields - Part 2

The killing Fields - Part 2 - Meilleure résolution par xiao_wuu

The killing Fields - Part 3

The Killing Flields - Part 3 par xiao_wuu

Prof . Allan Stam: Understanding the Rwanda Genocide - Full version

Documentary: RWANDA'S UNTOLD STORY

Rwanda's Untold Story Documentary from RDI-Rwanda Rwiza on Vimeo.

Rethinking Rwanda - Prof. Davenport

Peter Erlinder comments on the BBC documentary "Rwanda's Untold Story

Isaiah 42-46: “Hear, you deaf. Look, you blind, and see!

Thursday, November 6, 2014

Rwanda : Pour le régime de P. Kagame, le documentaire de la BBC est une « affaire d’Etat » Pourquoi ?

Le 01 octobre2014, la chaîne britannique de télévision publique BBC Two a diffusé pour la première fois un documentaire intitulé « Rwanda’s Untold Story ».

Aussitôt, dans les cercles du pouvoir à Kigali, ce fut un tollé. Les réactions le plus souvent épidermiques et dictées par les services de propagande officiels ont éclaté dans tous les sens. A Kigali même, des jeunes « Intore », la milice du parti-Etat qu’est le FPR, a été jetée dans les rues pour scander des slogans hostiles à la BBC tout en chantant les louanges du président Kagame. Les femmes aussi furent mises à contribution : des centaines parmi elles ont convergé vers le bureau local de la BBC dans un quartier de Kigali, mais certaines d’entre elles croyaient encore être là pour dénoncer « l’Allemagne qui avait arrêté leur Rose Kabuye » !

A Londres, toutes les représentations du régime en Europe reçurent ordre d’acheminer des manifestants devant le siège de la BBC. Sur le plan des mesures gouvernementales, les émissions de la BBC en langue Kinyarwanda furent suspendues au Rwanda sans que l’on sache pourquoi étant donné que le documentaire est en anglais et qu’il est diffusé sur la seule chaîne TV accessible à quelques rares privilégiés rwandais. Mais, ce n’était pas fini car l’inénarrable ministre des Affaires étrangères et porte-parole du gouvernement Louise Mushikiwabo déclara entre-temps que son gouvernement étudiait encore la réponse à réserver à la BBC suite à cet « affront » fait au « Rwanda » et à son cher président Paul Kagame. Il semble que la fameuse réponse ne va pas tarder à venir puisque Kigali vient de mettre en place une Commission dite « Des experts pour analyser le documentaire de la BBC, Rwanda : Untold Storry ».

Avant de réfléchir sur la nécessité, de voir la mission et la composition pour le moins bizarre de cette Commission, il y a lieu de se poser la question de savoir pourquoi ce simple documentaire de quelques minutes a fait sortir de ses gonds un des régimes les plus prétentieux du monde. A défaut d’apporter une réponse absolue, force est de constater ce qui suit :

- Le petit documentaire s’attaque et fait écrouler les mythes fondateurs du régime du FPR-Inkotanyi, mythes dont il tire une légitimité à laquelle il ne pourrait jamais prétendre. En effet, jusqu’ici, la conquête du pouvoir par une armée étrangère était présentée comme une mission humanitaire « pour arrêter un génocide ».

Dans ce cadre, les mensonges du régime même les plus grossiers étaient tolérés sinon occultés par la même communauté internationale pour ne pas embarrasser leur protégé. C’est ainsi que les statistiques fantaisistes ont été admises comme fiables dès lors qu’elles allaient dans le sens de la propagande du FPR. Pour la première fois, le documentaire de la BBC a osé sortir de ce carcan, sans polémique, mais par un raisonnement et des calculs élémentaires.

- Paul Kagame étant l’auteur de l’élément déclencheur du génocide à savoir l’assassinat du président Habyarimana le 6 avril 1994, au lieu de se glorifier de cet « acte de guerre » comme il commençait à le clamer tout haut après le forfait, avait été sommé par ses complices et maîtres de tout nier et avait reçu toutes les assurances pour l’aider à en être disculpé. Le documentaire de la BBC lui ouvre les yeux et lui montre que ces grandes puissances qui l’ont poussé dans sa conquête du pouvoir savent tout ce qui s’est passé et sont à mesure de le révéler au monde quand bon leur semble.

- Avec les témoignages de personnalités comme Carla Del Ponte qui fut Procureur du Tribunal Pénal International pour le Rwanda (TPIR) et qui démontrent que Kagame et son FPR ont bénéficié d’une impunité voulue et exigée par les puissances qui pourtant étaient au courant des crimes que son armée commettait, n’augurent rien quant à l’avenir du dictateur et de son régime le moment où les mêmes puissances n’auront plus besoin de lui.

- Enfin, sur le plan interne, le documentaire détruit en quelques minutes la propagande du régime tutsi dans son entreprise de lavage des cerveaux et de chosification de la majorité hutu qui se caractérise par des campagnes et décisions controversées comme : le bannissement de la langue française dans l’enseignement sans transition ; la diabolisation des régimes d’avant 1994 et la réécriture de l’histoire du pays selon l’idéologie de l’UNAR ancêtre du FPR actuel parti-état ou la chasse aux opposants avec l’accusation vague et passe-partout de « véhiculer l’idéologie du génocide ».

Ce constat peut amener n’importe quel dictateur même le plus téméraire et inconscient à s’alarmer. Voilà pourquoi le documentaire de la BBC dérange au plus haut niveau le pouvoir dictatorial de Paul Kagame.

Une « Commission BBC »

Comme on l’a vu, le régime vient de mettre en place une commission nationale chargée de se pencher sur le documentaire de la BBC. Sans autre précision sur sa mission, on peut supposer qu’elle doit rassembler les éléments pouvant amener le gouvernement rwandais à porter plainte contre la BBC et demander des dommages et intérêts et même plus loin servir de base à ce que des lois internationales sanctionnent ce genre de publications, à savoir celle qui critiquerait le régime en place au Rwanda. Cependant en considérant la composition même de cette commission, nous pensons que le chemin est encore long et que ce n’est pas celle-ci qui contribuera à faire admettre au Monde que la propagande du FPR véhiculée depuis son invasion du Rwanda venant d’Ouganda en 1990 doit être prise comme « la vérité absolue sur ce qui s’est passé au Rwanda ».

Composition de la « Commission BBC »

La commission est composée de cinq personnalités. Mais trois d’entre elles ont d’emblée attiré notre attention car leur profil permet de se faire une idée sur la qualité du rapport final qu’ils vont produire et la crédibilité à lui accorder.

Martin Ngoga

Ce tutsi qui est né et grandi en Tanzanie a été, après la prise du pouvoir du FPR, le représentant du Rwanda auprès du TPIR à Arusha. Il s’est alors distingué dans la chasse aux collaborateurs des avocats de la défense, à l’intimidation des témoins à décharge et à la mise en place d’un véritable « syndicat de délateurs » appelés abusivement témoins à charge. Il reçut alors une promotion spectaculaire et devint « Procureur général du Rwanda ». A ce poste prestigieux, il se distingua dans la fabrication et la publication des listes sauvages de ceux qu’il appelait les « génocidaires » en alertant toutes les polices du monde notamment Interpol qui exécutait sans broncher ses injonctions. Il s’est avéré que sur ses listes figuraient même des personnes décédées bien avant 1990 mais dont les nouveaux maîtres du pays voulaient faire condamner pour s’emparer de leurs propriétés ou dissuader leurs proches de revenir au Rwanda tout en les déstabilisant dans les pays d’exil.

C’est sûrement lui qui va rédiger l’Acte d’Accusation dans des termes qui lui sont familiers quand il s’agit d’accuser les « génocidaires » ou les « négationnistes ». Quelle crédibilité auront les conclusions du « Commissaire » Martin Ngoga ?

Mfizi Christophe

Ce hutu originaire de Gisenyi comme l’ancien président Habyarimana fut pendant plus de 15 ans le tout puissant directeur de l’Office Rwandais d’Information (ORINFOR), le service étatique qui gérait les médias notamment la Radio Rwanda ainsi que la presse écrite du régime. Il fit sensation quand à la faveur du multipartisme, il changea son fusil d’épaule pour rejoindre l’opposition naissante qui flirtait avec la rébellion du FPR qui avait attaqué le pays à partir d’Ouganda en octobre 1990. Christophe Mfizi, pour ses talents littéraires, fut alors mis à profit pour diaboliser le président Habyarimana qui, malgré tout, restait populaire dans la population. L’on se souviendra de son fameux pamphlet « Ikiguri-Nunga » ou « Le Réseau Zéro » dans lequel il « révélait » ou inventait l’existence d’une organisation criminelle évoluant dans le cercle restreint du président Habyarimana. Une dizaine d’années plus tard, le même Christophe Mfizi était confondu devant le TPIR et il fut incapable d’établir formellement l’existence de son fameux « Réseau Zéro » dont l’un des membres présumé alors jugé parle le TPIR était principalement accusé d’appartenir. Il fut si confus que le Procureur du TPIR n’osa pas présenter son rapport d’expertise comme pièce à conviction, malgré que Christophe Mfizi avait perçu une somme de 10.000 dollars pour élaborer ce document fantaisiste intitulé « Le Réseau zéro B ». L’accusé, dont au passage le nom avait servi à Mfizi de donner le titre à son pamphlet de 1991, fut acquitté de tous les chefs d’accusations. Auparavant Christophe Mfizi aura acquis le titre « à vie » d’Ambassadeur, puisqu’en 1994, en guise de remerciement, le FPR après sa prise du pouvoir, le nomma Ambassadeur du Rwanda à Paris. Arrivé à son poste, il se rendit à l’évidence : il n’était qu’un faire-valoir. En effet il était constamment humilié par ses « subordonnés formels » mais en réalités ses patrons car ils étaient des tutsi venus d’Ouganda. On raconte même qu’il lui arrivait d’être giflé par son chauffer ! De guerre lasse, il démissionna et demanda l’asile politique en France. Hélas !, confronté aux aléas de la vie de réfugié auxquels s’ajoutaient les problèmes d’ordre privé, C.Mfizi se résolut à refaire allégeance à Paul Kagame qui, dans son « indulgence proverbiale », le reprit parmi les Hutu de service.

Voici l’homme qui est ajourd'hui appelé à juger le documentaire de la BBC et à faire des recommandations au gouvernement de Kagame. Quelle crédibilité sera-t-elle accordé aux recommandations du vieux Mfizi vus son parcours et surtout sa situation actuelle ?

Evode Uwizeyimana

Alors là, avec Evode Uwizeyimana, le FPR a touché le fond du ridicule. Voici un garçon qui, il y a encore quelques mois, d’abord comme un « jeune juriste vivant au Canada », ne tarissait pas de reproches envers le régime du FPR surtout sur les antennes de la …BBC ; voici un mec qui, il y a à peine quelques mois, était membre du parti d’opposition RDI Rwanda Rwiza, mis en place par l’ancien Premier ministre Faustin Twagiramungu, n’a cessé de pourfendre le régime pour ses crimes et diverses violations des droits de l’homme ; voici un homme qui, après un problème familiale qu’il eut au Canada, a négocié et obtenu son retour au Rwanda où il fut nommé « Conseiller » au ministère de la Justice et qui, dans sa première interview à Kigali, n’a pas nié ses prises de positions antérieures hostiles au régime et a évoqué la prescription et le classement sans suite... Et c’est ce même homme qui doit juger, en tant que « spécialiste du droit », le documentaire de la BBC ! Quelle crédibilité accorder aux considérations de « Maître » Evode Uwizeyimana ?

En conclusion

Le régime Kagame a certes été touché et ébranlé dans ses fondements par le documentaire de la BBC « Rwanda's Untold Story ». Mais ses réactions sont ridicules, disproportionnées et non productives. Il en va de même de cette « Commission » composée de personnalités qui peuvent se revendiquer de tout comme l’arbitraire (Martin Ngoga), la mesquinerie ( Christophe Mfizi) et l’opportunisme primaire (Evode Uwizeyimana) ; mais surtout pas de commissaires indépendants. On croyait qu’après 20 ans de pouvoir et 24 ans de propagande mensongère, le FPR pouvait nous réserver mieux dans sa lutte pour sa survie. Hélas !, c’est raté.

Jane Mugeni

05/11/2014

Sunday, November 2, 2014

African survivors survives on donations

The blog of African Survivors International is like a library or a public park where we can all go to think, learn and get the trustful information about the Truth on Rwanda.
African survivors survives on donations averaging about €10.

Now is the time we ask. If everyone reading this right now gave €2, our fundraiser would be done within an hour.

Monday, October 27, 2014

Geachte heer Teeven, waarom wordt deze man van genocide beticht?

Rwandan political prisoner Victoire Ingabire has filed an appeal to the African Court of Human and People's Rights in Arusha, Tanzania.

Lin Muyizere (49) uit Rwanda dreigt zijn Nederlandse paspoort te verliezen vanwege beschuldigingen van betrokkenheid bij genocide. De bewijzen zijn flinterdun en in Rwanda loopt hij groot gevaar. Deel 1 van een tweeluik over actuele asieldrama’s.

Geachte heer Teeven, waarom wordt deze man van genocide beticht?

Excellentie,

Meneer de staatssecretaris,

Geachte heer Teeven,

Twee weken geleden heb ik in de buurt van Rotterdam CS een colaatje gedronken met een genocidepleger. Althans, dat vinden uw diensten. Lin Muyizere, een Rwandese vader van 49 die al twintig jaar in Nederland woont en Nederlands staatsburger is, zuchtte en schoof mij het dossier van de IND toe. Hij had het enkele dagen daarvoor per aangetekende post ontvangen.

‘De unit 1F van de IND heeft onderzoek ingesteld naar uw mogelijke betrokkenheid bij de genocide in Rwanda,’ stond er. ‘Genoemde unit 1F heeft een beoordeling uitgebracht en geconcludeerd dat er ernstige redenen zijn om te veronderstellen dat u zich schuldig heeft gemaakt, dan wel verantwoordelijk bent te houden voor één of meerdere gedragingen als genoemd in artikel 1F van het Vluchtelingenverdrag. […] Gezien het bovenstaande ben ik van oordeel dat u op onjuiste gronden het Nederlanderschap is verleend.’

Lin Muyizere keek mij doodmoe aan. ‘Ik heb zes weken tijd om te reageren. Ik heb drie kinderen, de jongste is twaalf. Als ze mijn nationaliteit afpakken, kan ik teruggestuurd worden naar Rwanda. Dan vlieg ik onmiddellijk de gevangenis in. Of word ik vermoord.'

The lady in pink

Verstaat u mij niet verkeerd, meneer de staatssecretaris. Ik ben niet het type dat moord en brand schreeuwt zodra een asielaanvraag geweigerd wordt. Ik begrijp dat anno 2014 asiel en migratie buitengewoon complexe materies zijn waarin de overheid heldere keuzes dient te maken tussen nationale belangen en individuele noden. Tussen schrijnende verhalen en verzonnen miserie.

Maar Lin Muyizere, meneer de staatssecretaris! Weet u wel wie hij is? Laat mij het u vertellen: hij is de echtgenoot van de beroemdste dissidente in Rwanda, Victoire Ingabire, de lady in pink.Roze is de kleur van het gevangenisplunje in Rwanda. Deze bevlogen, strijdlustige vrouw keerde na zeventien jaar ballingschap in Nederland in 2010 vrijwillig terug om deel te nemen aan de presidentsverkiezingen.

Zover kwam het niet. Haar medestanders werden op alle mogelijke manieren geboycot, gesaboteerd en gemolesteerd; zijzelf werd gearresteerd en veroordeeld tot vijftien jaar onvoorwaardelijke hechtenis in een proces dat met haken en ogen aaneen hing. Ze zit nu vier jaar in de gevangenis. En nu wilt u haar man de Nederlandse nationaliteit afnemen, terwijl het Rwandese regime bekendstaat om het intimideren van familieleden van dissidenten?

A Candle For Remembering

Rwanda: Cartographie des crimes

Let us remember Our People

You can't stop thinking

Welcome to Home Truths

Everybody Hurts

KAGAME - GENOCIDAIRE

Paul Kagame admits ordering...

Why did Kagame this to me?

RPF committed the unspeakable

Inzira ndende

Search

Hutu Children & their Mums

Rwanda-rebranding

Ways To Get Rid of Kagame

Almighty God :Justice for US

Killing Hutus on daily basis

RPF Trade Mark: Akandoya

The Torture in Rwanda flourishes

Fighting For Our Freedom?

KAGAME VS JUSTICE

LETTER FROM THE NORTH: HOW EMILE GAFIRITA WAS ABDUCTED BY PAUL KAGAME’S OPERATIVES.‏

Rwandans protest Dutch support for Kagame dictatorship

“Look, this man is in front of you because of what he did for Victoire Ingabire. And Holland should know what’s happening to that very brave woman. And this is the reason why they want him.”

Breaking neuws: A Must See : RWANDA'S UNTOLD STORY that Leads Necessary to RETHINKING RWANDA

Stephen Sackur talks to Rwanda's president, Paul Kagame, The Rwandan Genocide mastermind

Rethinking Rwanda - Prof. Davenport

Peter Erlinder comments on the BBC documentary "Rwanda's Untold Story

Rwanda : Pour le régime de P. Kagame, le documentaire de la BBC est une « affaire d’Etat » Pourquoi ?

African survivors survives on donations

Geachte heer Teeven, waarom wordt deze man van genocide beticht?

The lady in pink

AS International

Profile

Genocide masterminded by RPF

Human and Civil Rights

Rwanda: A mapping of crimes

KIBEHO: Rwandan Auschwitz

Mass murderers C. Sankara

Stephen Sackur’s Hard Talk.

Prof. Allan C. Stam

Prof. Christian Davenport

The killing Fields - Part 1

The killing Fields - Part II

Daily bread for Rwandans

The killing Fields - Part III

Time has come: Regime change

Drame rwandais- justice impartiale

Sheltering 2,5 million refugees

Latest videos

Rwanda's Untold Story

Rwanda, un génocide en questions

Nombre de Visiteurs

Pages

Popular Posts - Last 7 days

Archives

Everything happens for a reason

Hutus didn't plan Tutsi Genocide

Your comment if you LIKE IT. All for Human rights