Genocide charges planed by the autocratic regime in Rwanda are gathered through African Rights, its main criminal organization

****
How could you back criminals like Paul Kagame?
Stop the Killers.
Stop the bloodshed in Rwanda
Keep these horror weapons out of RPF fanatics
Rakia Omar and her likes constantly call for our extemination. If we just voice our disapproval, maybe they'll have a change of heart. You are told you MUST believe them and this has been repeated ad nauseum.

****
Help the holocaust survivors. Please open your eyes! The Genocide against Hutus is underway in 2009 carried out by those you're supporting: Paul Kagame and his RPF. How can we let our voices be heard? We will never, ever stop asking questions why, and why we are dying. The Tutsi government is exterminating us in your eyes and you keep it shut. Why? Why? Why?

****

What is happening in the Congo happened yesterday. The same victims, the same criminals-perpetrators: Paul Kagame and his RPF. 3,500,000 Rwandans most of them Hutus were slaughtered for the same reasons.

Before arrests, imprisonment, assassinations, massacres, hutu ethinic members get multiple incriminating labels that constitute RPF pretext to destroy the majority of the Rwandan population: genocidaire, ex-FAR, Igipinga, French, fugitives, refugees under chains of Interahamwe, hostages of Hutu extremists, Interahamwe, FDLR, RUD, RDR, etc. Every arrest, every killing has already its explanation. How to survive this holocaust of Hutus with the ever razor-sharp propaganda of the fascist Kagame regime? If the world doesn't stop RPF criminals, we have no doubt that any witness will survive.

****

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2919610/DECEMBER-A-WELCOME-EXPRESSION-OF-INTENT-THE-NAIROBI-COMMUNIQUE-AND) and other lobbies working to silence the Hutu ethnic members and cement the Tutsi ethnic group

(http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/chronology.asp?groupId=49009)

****

When Nazis and Fascists take over the world, you're going to need to be prepared.

****
The most striking thing to all of us Rwandan survivors is the cunningness that Paul Kagame uses to make his agenda appear benign in the eyes of the world community. Therefore some governments assist in the ongoing meticulously planned murderhood, genocide, crimes, terror and repression using criminal organizations like Africa Rights, RCD, CNDP (generals Ntaganda and Nkunda) and their commanders.

How do you call the murder of an ethnicity or the extinction of any human group sharing a genetic or ancestral affinity? What about this is ethnic cleansing we are watching inside and outside Rwanda, we encounter many crimes, Terror, and Repression against the same ethnic group by the same perpetrators and criminals. The tutis minority under the RPF criminal organization has statutorily excluded the Hutu ethnic majority from the political process. We see a buid-up of an undisguised Tutsi minority monopoly over economic power in Rwanda.

To achieve this goal and speed up their extermination, Hutu refugees are often and repeatedly considered guilty by association. RPF has established a system that required a highly repressive state machinery directed against the conquered hutu ethnic members whom the new apartheid rulers regarded as a rightless mass to be held down by force of arms.

The RPF oppression thus finds expression in the palpable form of a number of economic, social and developmental indicators, such as poverty and underdevelopment, the low levels of literacy and numeracy among Hutus. Being blaimed for the genocide and genocide ideology, most of them have the low access to clean water, the non-availability of electricity, their low food consumption, their invariably low incomes, many of them are forcibly working for the governement in enslaving way due to TIG, an organization created ad hoc to organize Hutu prisoners; the poor state of their health, the low levels of skills since 1994, the generally unsafe environment in which Hutus live, etc.

The extremist Tutsi and STILL President of Rwanda Paul Kagame explains: P. Kagame (a Tutsi), said since a major return of the Hutu refugees would further decrease the ratio of Tutsis compared to the total population in Rwanda. Kagame declared “we want the refugees to come back, but not at any cost…

Our concern is that the military operations that led to the massive return of Rwandan refugees from eastern Zaire and now Democratic Republic of the Congo have ultimately sown seeds for a bitter harvest.

Just like before, we mention in the chapter dealing with the extremist Tutsi government that Kagame’s regime shows no flexibility vis-à- vis the return of the refugees, and that its attitude augured badly for the future of the returnees. Actually the RPF regime governs in an exclusive and discriminatory fashion in the country where the ethnic minority has he wherewithal to pursue its genocidal intentions by all means and particularly by intensifying oppressive policies.

Just like before, we also mention that the Rwandan government favors a marginalization of the refugee population (all of them Hutus) upon its return, to avoid any attempt toward power-sharing arrangements. Beyond the security issue inside Rwanda and the concept of voluntary return, we should also consider the concept of “constructive” return.

Such a concept make it difficult to quantify and is subjected to broad interpretation. However, the 1996 military operations offer a good example of an “Unconstructive” return.
The refugees returned in a context of decreasing Hutu influence within the political apparatus of Rwanda. We saw mega massacres throughout the country and many died because they were returnee refugees.

Negotiations between the refugee leadership and the Rwandan regime have always been a non desirable prospect, but dialogue between Kagame regime and representatives of the refugee population would have helped bridge the “perception gap.”

The world community hardliners have never got the will to make pressure on the criminal Paul Kagame even though they do have all proofs he murdered millions of people. This did not happen yet. What we see confirms our feelings that Rwandan survivors have no other choice rather to kneel. Have a look:

The rural population, Hutu in its majority, is at risk of being confined to activities aimed at sustaining the towns inhabited by the majority of the Tutsi population. In that sense, it’s undoubtedly known that economic marginalization is actually inevitable. Political marginalization against Hutu ethnic members has largely increased in recent years.

RPF has no longer decided not to use hutu puppets to blind the world community about their apartheid build-up.
If nothing is done to make pressure on the RPF, the above will be a harbinger of future turmoil. The marginalized segment of the Rwandan society cannot forever remain submissive and accept undivided power by a minority.

Extremist Tutsi elements will thrive in this context cement the hatred between the two communities. The return of the refugees did not take place in a constructive environment, socioeconomically or politically speaking;

This will further aggravate the situation inside Rwanda. The initiatives discussed in the previous chapters have resulted in a forced return, but in an early phase only and aimed at strengthening the power of the Tutsi extremists.

A certain degree of voluntariness subsists. This meant that the returnees had to be considered as individuals. In late 1996, the refugee population was trapped in Mugunga and was virtually marched down to Gisenyi, after having been shelled and fired and many of them killed by ADFL/RPA/Mai-Mai.
The Rwandan regime had not moved one inch towards the refugee population. On the contrary, although relieved to see an end to the refugee problem, the international community did participate in the return by registering returnees who, after a few months lists were given to the RPF government.

What followed was mass slaughters. Many of them, in their possession of the UNHCR document and thus with the lack of ID cards, were assassinated one by one together with their families and neighbors, and had no substantive voice in it. The returnees were considered by Rwanda as “prima facie culprits.”

To this big issue, no compromise had been reached. It was a “zero-sum” repatriation in which one party (the new regime) maintained its previous inflexible position, and the other was immediately marginalized.
The role of the humanitarian community in the Great Lakes refugee crisis has been repeatedly criticized but no one has tried to politically resolve this issue.

How many phrases or titles of articles, books, websites and blogs like “international intervention: thoughtless responses,” or “The bankruptcy of ‘humanitarian policy’” have we read, concerning the Great Lakes?
Many criticisms, Humanitarian agencies, especially at field level, have underestimated certain elements and some of them undermined the situation to favor the RPF regime when promoting or lobbying for an early return movement.

Nowadays, humanitarian organizations in asylum countries should play a positive role in political issues trying to influence events inside Rwanda, or even sponsoring contacts between the new Rwandan regime and refugees. Whatever weakness humanitarian agencies such as UNHCR may have displayed, they often were the victim of their own success.

We should not forget that, first and foremost, UNHCR and its partners have to deal with the largest humanitarian crisis of recent times but did not accordingly respond to an emergency and a human drama of almost unprecedented scale.

© Survivors Editions

The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine