© As International - Community for SurViVors

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Is it possible to dismantle the RPF criminal organizations around the world?

01/05/2010

The world is not a static dead place, it is a living process.

Just find out here below:

Posted in J'accuse

[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination with an iron hand, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus), and mass-arrests and mass-murder by the RPF criminal organization.=>ASIF]

The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) is a criminal organization primarily national and international, well structured and very hierarchical, directed from Rwanda and active mainly in Europe and North America. Each organization is headed by regional managers to oversee the crimes of the RPF in different forms and crimes committed by members who also collect contributions made for the criminal case at the regional level.
Will it be possible one day to open an investigation by police against a number of people from Rwanda, especially those who present themselves as students, researchers, members of the Rwandan embassies not enjoying any diplomatic immunity and organizations that defend the tyrannical regime of the RPF?

Yes, it is necessary to speak about these criminal organizations inspired and directly controled from Rwanda. Yes, it is necessary to speak about these criminal organizations in the African Great Lakes region. Yes, it should be about these criminal organizations globally at the international level if they exceed the boundaries of Rwanda, but become transnational organizations working in synchronization with the central power of the RPF in Kigali. To understand the center of this great crime whose victims are often opponents of the regime, members of the exiled Hutu and living abroad.

The majority of Rwandans hope General Kagame, the bloody dictator of Rwanda and his created puppet Ms. Rakiya Omaar will be arrested this year 2010 for the sake of Reconcilation and Happyness of all Rwandans.

At European level, the organization's activities are directed from Belgium by individuals responsible for overseeing individuals based in different countries of Western Europe as well as cash income for a criminal case referred to as name "IBUKA. In Canada and the United States is the same structure but with slightly different names or added as the Rwandan community in one place or another, etc..

If you approach these organizations, you will find them with names that seemingly have nothing to do with the RPF. They are individuals who declared themselves as asylum seekers, students, etc.. This is actually the backbone of the RPF, the RPF ramifications subservient, its subsidiaries who will emerge as an organization or association or humanitarian purpose defense of human rights, organization for the promotion Women, an organization for orphaned children, survivors, victims of genocide, and not just any one of Tutsis as recently wanted dictator Gen. Paul Kagame. As you know, the planning of the genocide and wants as a springboard, the bridge was built the RPF or rather its spiritual leader Paul Kagame, open quotes, strategist, close violently quotes.

Member or Associate shall mean an individual member or not of Umuryango the RPF, organization involved in the activities of a criminal organization or associated with it on behalf of the dictator Paul Kagame and his Akazu. This organization includes the followers and sympathizers of the RPF, affiliates or associates of the RPF, greedy people who invite at any time the bloodthirsty dictator of Rwanda, others who undertake to make cans reports, distributing doctorate Honoris Causa all this is done in order to whitewash the crimes of the bloody dictator Paul Kagame, the RPF General.

Basically, that means `` Criminal Organization: It is an association or group continuously engaged in criminal activity at all levels. It includes media groups or not, individuals / terrorists or sponsors of terrorist acts, organizations and associations that are established in the community in the country.

Distinguishing marks of RPF criminal organizations :

These organizations or associations and have a structured organization, difficult to recognize as criminal organization. They often refer to human rights, put their heads of foreign criminals usually women. These associations will require organizations are composed mainly of victims of the Rwandan genocide of the Tutsi genocide now become as Ibuka, Survival, FIDH. They write articles for the vigilance of the international law, have false documents or water bottle, doing activities related to human rights, etc..
***

“If FDLR is a terrorist organization, General Paul Kagame would be the first to be prosecuted for standing with the terrorists. General Rwarakabije and Col. Murenzi Evariste were the high ranking military officers of the FDLR.

That is the most disgusting political rhetoric (rhetoric of shame) when Kagame accuses Ingabire for being linked to terrorism. Also leave aside the painfully simplistic and New Times -mimicking characterization of the Hutu opponent as “genocidaire, enemy and terrorist”. That demonstrates indeed the central prong of Kagame’s current strategy to "win" the August elections. What is particularly bothersome about Kagame’s attacks against his political opponents is the premise that it is improper, unpatriotic and even terrorist mimicking to arrest a mother of three children only because she challenges him by announcing to run for President of Rwanda. Such a behavior is unacceptable and will absolutely lead to the RPF peril”.

Jean-Christophe Nizeyimana

Chairperson

African SurviVors International

***They compile lists of enemies of the RPF regime, that is to say, those who are potential murderers, deniers, the divisive and those who eventually genocidal ideology! Who are in fact their victims? These are the Hutu intellectuals, Hutu businessmen, students, former members of the Rwandan government, the former FAR soldiers. This categorization affects all segments of the population or the exiled Hutu ethnic group for a better demonizing and discrediting pushed to the maximum. Behind this plot, there is the idea that many will have noticed a purpose: the day the murders will be committed against the Hutus, there will be nobody to talk or cry, and demand an investigation because enough singled out by the so-called humanitarian groups or design the defense of human rights!

To recognize them, these criminal organizations are fleeing the televised debates with organizations or individuals who oppose the neo-Nazi regime installed in Kigali. To initiate such debate is as if a you initiate a undesirable direct confrontation between fire and water. To recognize those organizations RPF, you will have their spheres of action everywhere, to hold meetings with slogans that have nothing to do with the work they accomplish in general while hiding their crimes. They have codes of groups, photos, training materials, clothing, appropriate literature, publications and other internal communications of a specific group apparently aimed to enhance humanitarian activities and defense of human rights while in fact, it is a criminal organization syndicated to large organized crime.
Let mention some of them:

DMI, Ibuka, Local Defence Forces (LDF), Africa Rights of Ms. Rakiya Omaar, Survie whose members include Survival Tutsi extremists and foreigners or whose wives are of Tutsi origin. Carbonare, Verschave Rutaysire Francis, Augustine Gatera, Yolanda Mukagasana Jose Kagabo (now Senator as a recompense for having enough discredited France), members of Ibuka scattered across Europe, Alain Gautier and his wife Dafroza Mukarumongi Jean Paul Gouteux, Jean-Pierre Chretien, who refused Madeleine Mukamabano adversarial on RFI, Monique Mas, Marie-France Cros and Colette Brackmann Their role is known as the RPF propaganda. In addition, you will have experienced the RPF propaganda sympathizers like Imma, Gourinovitch, Linda, Mr. FIDH that facilitated and assisted to speed u p the assassinations and mass-murder of Hutus. There are some of them like Le Soir, La Libre Belgique, RFI, Goliath, Do not touch Cain,etc.

There is no need to conclude that RPF is a 100% criminal organization. It has a government and a state used for criminal purposes and which protects the Mafioso existing in all RPF sub criminal organizations both at national and International levels. To get there, General Paul Kagame dictator uses his power to his advantage to control the entire socio-economic and cultural life in Rwanda.

As we mentioned earlier, all these organizations, is it necessary to repeat together form a community of criminals, supporters or not but greedy for money, all under the authority of the Führer and which are subordinate to intermediate between the RPF and the organization. In fact, there is a division of labor coruscated for the lobby of the RPF, to help the RPF death squads dotted around the world, wherever and whenever necessary, each member playing a specific role and adjusting other roles that are assigned by the RPF Head Quarters in Kigali, here you see the real pattern of “a regulated corruption”.

As if that was not enough, you will recognize these organizations for a considerable social harm as African Rights and Survie, organizations which are not afraid of receiving millions of dollars for this dirty work of laundering money from the Crusades of Kagame, whose professionalism and efficiency has been demonstrated. However, these groups operate on both level of propaganda and intimidation, /assassinations (including the use of poisons).

The international mafia (linked to Kagame and his sponsors) works through the infiltration and disinformation, uses dirty milled money, prostitutes, etc.. You will recognize the organizations when they claim to be the spokesperson of the of all Rwandans in the region where they are installed. These organizations have the ability to escape national and international criminal penalties when it becomes necessary to analyze the specific nature and the illegality of their activities. This loophole is normally due to their internal structure and relations of interests with the company linked to local mafia they operate with.

For example, just take Ms. Rakiya Omaar of African Rights and Survie. Like other RPF criminal organizations, both were created to be manipulated by political and military leadership of the RPF. That allows the RPF leadership to better infiltrate and participate in political processes, diplomatic and military at the regional and international levels. Their role is mainly to stigmatize all Hutu ethnic members outside of Rwanda. Thoughtlessly, observers have found out that it is ultimately the main activity to which they are relegated.

We saw amalgamation of collaboration between the RPF sub-organizations at all levels and in almost all Western countries organized again by the politico-administrative leadership of the RPF. This way the RPF leadership coordinates and controls the whole system under labels "wealth management networks, in public and private sectors , through legal denominations allowing them to carry out illegal activities nationally, regionally and internationally.

According to some of the organizations RPF sources, they have the ability to multi-level intervention that takes the redundancy of crimes between the protagonists of this mafia system. The recruitment might be on a transnational basis and network members may occupy several positions in different areas at different levels of the social system for the Kagame’s strict control of the entire life of Rwandans.

The structure also varies and depends on the position of the network in relation to politics, NGOs and pressure groups recognized in North America, the United Kingdom and in general operating abroad. Meaning that a network of actors pursue more effectively to serve the interests of the top Rwandan Nazi who has solid support in the diplomatic, political mafia at the international level especially in the West.

You know how these organizations operate, defend the RPF regime whenever it runs into difficulty at the international level. When the international community is questioning the legitimacy of the RPF regime's repressive government which is composed of Tutsi extremist criminals based on the German Nazi system’ methods. As a result, RPF crimes make difference in comparison with other atrocities known up to date. To be humble, the Rwandan dictatorship is known to be the best "criminal-political hierarchy well organized group ever in Africa and whose tentacles are worldwide." This criminal and Stalinist regime installed in Rwanda makes clear on one hand the configuration of power of the central government and the RPF on the other hand. These criminal organizations are also partitioned into grids under total control of the intelligence organizations like DIM and CID with the help of the RPF militia known as Local Defense forces (LDF).

It is therefore necessary to emphasize that these other organizations include corrupt individual personalities and, who corrupt then after the media which replaced in many cases judges and courts to malign and portray the exiled Hutu community members worldwide. The case demonstrates the harmfulness of this system and the profound hypocrisy of some Western countries particularly the Anglo-Saxon that refuse in this case to comply with human rights and fight the existing terrorism (chosen one, which benefits the fuzzy definition to favor the RPF terrorist organization) and respect for individual freedoms.

In this context, the corrupt media that we find here and there in Europe and North America in this type of staging does not contradict us. To carry out this goal, multinationals responsible for plundering the natural resources of the African Great Lakes region are buying the media as a reward to the heinous crimes they arrange with the RPF, both nationally and internationally. Also in this same vein, RPF will have financial, diplomatic and political support to do everything possible to make them as legally recognized organizations. At the same time, these organizations hide their primary objective by using fake denominations to ensure `the well-being of criminals RPF` is maintained.

On the other hand they are to discredit ALL OF THOSE WHO REFUSE TO COOPERATE WITH THE NAZI REGIME AND THE RPF SYSTEM INSTALLED UNDER THE AEGIS OF THE RPF HEADED BY THE PRESIDENT PAUL KAGAME. These organizations are IN CHARGE of demonizing all of those who negatively react to the RPF crimes and prefer to denounce the RPF system. On the other hand, the mafia’s network has a clear objective of discrediting various internationally renowned researchers and famous investigation journalists who unmasked the criminal mafia in charge of convincing the entire the main donors and world decision-makers by all means with the screenplay of Paul Kagame about the Rwandan tragedy.

On the other hand, there is no denying that General Kagame is undoubtedly the mastermind and the schemer of all the incomparable massacres experienced by the people of Rwanda and Congo.

African SurViVors International

01/05/2010

Publié dans J'accuse

Est-il possible de démanteler les organisations criminelles du FPR à travers le monde ?

Le Front Patriotique Rwandais (FPR) est une organisation criminelle d’abord nationale puis internationale, parfaitement structurée et fortement hiérarchisée, dirigée depuis le Rwanda et active principalement en Europe et en Amérique du nord. Chacune de ces organisations est dirigée par des responsables régionaux chargés de superviser les crimes du FPR sous différentes formes et des crimes commis par les affiliés qui par ailleurs récoltent les cotisations faites en faveur de la caisse criminelle au niveau régional.

Sera-t-il possible un jour d’ouvrir une enquête de police judiciaire à l’encontre d’un certain nombre de personnes originaires du Rwanda, principalement ceux qui se présentent comme des étudiants, des chercheurs, des membres des ambassades rwandais ne jouissant pas d’immunité diplomatique et des organisations qui défendent le régime tyrannique du FPR ?

Oui, il ya lieu de parler de ces organisations criminelles téléguidées et dirigées à partir du Rwanda. Oui, il ya lieu de parler de ces organisations criminelles dans la région des grands lacs africains. Oui, il ya lieu de parler de ces organisations criminelles au niveau mondial lorsque celles-ci dépassent les frontières du Rwanda et deviennent transnationales mais des organisations qui œuvrent en synchronisation avec le pouvoir central du FPR à Kigali. Pour comprendre, au centre de cette grande criminalité dont les victimes sont souvent les opposants au régime, les membres de l’ethnie Hutu exilé et vivant à l’étranger.

Au niveau européen, les activités de l’organisation sont dirigées depuis la Belgique par des individus chargés de superviser les personnes en fonction dans les différents pays d’Europe occidentale ainsi que d’encaisser des revenus en faveur d’une caisse criminelle désignée sous le nom d’ « IBUKA ». Au Canada et aux États-Unis, c’est la même structure mais avec des noms un peu différents ou rajoutées comme la communauté rwandaise de tel endroit ou de tel autre, etc.

Si vous approcher ces organisations, vous les trouverez avec des noms apparemment qui n’ont rien à voir avec le FPR. Des individus qi se présentent comme des demandeurs d’asile, des étudiants, etc. Il s’agit en fait de la colonne vertébrale du FPR, des ramifications du FPR qui lui sont inféodées, de ses filiales qui vont se présenter comme organisation ou association humanitaire ou à vocation la défense des droits de l´homme, organisation pour la promotion de la femme, organisation des enfants orphelins, des rescapés, des victimes du génocide, et pas n´importe lequel, celui des Tutsis comme l’a voulu récemment le Général dictateur rwandais Paul Kagame.

Comme vous le savez, la planification du génocide le veut ainsi comme un tremplin, le pont que s´est construit le FPR ou plutôt son chef spirituel Paul Kagame, ouvrez les guillemets, le stratège, fermez violemment les guillemets. Le FPR s’est fixé le rôle de jouer un rôle de chef de file à l'échelle nationale et régionale pour soutenir des groupes criminels de tous ordres et, bien souvent, d’entretenir des guerres civiles ou de fomenter des assassinats de chefs d´États, de politiques pour son compte ou pour le compte de ses sponsors.

C´est dans ce cadre qu´est née la Mafia internationale qui s´occupe des financements du Top Nazi rwandais Paul Kagame dans tous les crimes dont il est responsable même si parfois il utilise des groupes terroristes armés, des rébellions ou des soi-disant opposants. Aujourd´hui, vous verrez que ces organisations criminelles portent différents noms, travaillent au niveau international et par là deviennent transnationales. Pour échapper aux sanctions internationales, Paul Kagame en est le chef suprême lui-même couvert par la mafia internationale qui veuille à ce que ses crimes ne soient pas punis, portés devant les juridictions internationales et ou l´impunité prospère au Rwanda quant il s´agit des crimes de toutes sortes commis par les nazis regroupés au sein du FPR, l´ organisation mafieuse à la tête de l´État rwandais.

Pouvons-nous trouver une solution pour faire disparaître ces organisations ? Très difficile à cause des ramifications et des structures jusqu´ici construites pour la protection de ces organisations criminelles. Une autre solution mais pas évidente, c´est d´encourager les membres de ces organisations criminelles et leurs associés à briser leurs liens avec ces groupes et surtout à dénoncer les mafiosos à la tête desquelles se trouve Paul Kagame, lui-même responsable d´avoir massacré plus de 8 millions de Rwandais et de Congolais. Je ne parle pas de Burundais et d´Ougandais.

Membre ou associé : une personne membre ou pas de l´Umuryango FPR impliquée dans les activités d'une organisation criminelle ou associée à celle-ci pour le compte du dictateur Paul Kagame et de son Akazu. Cette organisation comprend les adeptes, les sympathisants du FPR, membres affiliés ou associés du FPR, personnes cupides étrangers qui invitent à tout moment le sanguinaire dictateur rwandais, d’autres qui s’engagent à faire des reportages bidons, à distribuer des doctorats Honoris Causa tout ceci dans le but de blanchir les crimes du général dictateur Paul Kagame.

Au fond, que veut dire `Organisation criminelle` : C´est une association ou un groupe continuellement impliqué dans des activités criminelles à tous les niveaux. Elle Comprend les groupes média ou pas, des individus ou sponsors des actes terroristes, les organisations et les associations qui sont établis dans la collectivité dans un pays donnée.

Signes distinctifs des organisations criminelles du FPR :

Ces organisations et ou associations disposent d´une organisation structurée, difficile à reconnaître comme organisation criminelle. Elles se souvent se réfèrent aux droits de l´homme, mettent à leurs têtes des criminels étrangers en général des femmes. Ces associations vont se réclamer d’organisations étant composées essentiellement de victimes du génocide Rwandais aujourd’hui devenu génocide des Tutsis comme Ibuka, Survie, FIDH.

Elles écrivent des articles pour tromper la vigilance de la loi internationale, disposent de faux ou de documents- bidons, font des activités relatives aux droits de l’homme, etc. Elles établissent des listes d'ennemis du régime du FPR, c'est-à-dire ceux qui sont les potentiels génocidaires, les négationnistes, les divisionnistes et ceux qui finalement ont l’idéologie génocidaire ! Qui sont en fait leurs victimes ? Ce sont les Hutus intellectuels, les Hutus businessmen, étudiants, anciens membres du gouvernement rwandais, les anciens militaires des FAR .

Cette catégorisation touche toutes les couches de la population ou du groupe ethnique Hutu exilé pour une meilleure diabolisation et un discrédit poussé jusqu´au maximum. Derrière cette machination, il ya l’idée que plusieurs auront remarqué la finalité : le jour où les assassinats se seront perpétrés contre ces Hutus, il n´y aura personne pour en parler, pleurer ou exiger une enquête parce que suffisamment pointés du doigt par les soi-disant groupes à vocation humanitaire ou à dessein la défense des droits de l´homme !

Pour les reconnaitre, ces organisations criminelles fuient les débats télévisés avec les organisations ou individus qui s’opposent à ce régime néo-nazi installé à Kigali. Parller de ce genre de débat devient comme s´il s´agit d’une confrontation non souhaitée entre le feu et l´eau. Pour reconnaitre ces organisations du FPR, vous les verrez disposer de leurs champs d´action partout, organiser des réunions avec des slogans qui n´ont rien à voir avec le travail qu´elles font en général pour masquer leurs crimes. Elles disposent de codes de groupes, de photos, du matériel de formation, de vêtements, littérature, publications et toute autre communication interne d'un groupe précis indiquant une participation aux activités humanitaires et ou à dessein la défense des droits de l´homme alors qu´en fait, il s´agit d'une organisation criminelle, ou associations de malfaiteurs, de grande criminalité organisée. Ne fusse que pour vous en citer quelques unes :

DMI, Ibuka, Local Defence forces (LDF), Africa Rights de Rakiya Omaar, Survie dont les membres comprennent les extrémistes tutsis et ou des étrangers dont leurs épouses sont d’origine Tutsie: Carbonare, Verschave, François Rutayisire, Augustin Gatera, Mukagasana Yolanda, José Kagabo (devenu sénateur en guise de récompence pour avoir suffisamment discrédité la France), les membres d’Ibuka éparpillés en Europe, Alain Gautier et son épouse Dafroza Mukarumongi, Jean Paul Gouteux, Jean Pierre Chrétien, Madeleine Mukamabano qui refusent un débat contradictoire sur RFI, Monique Mas, Marie France Cros et Colette Brackmann dont leur rôle est connu dans la propagande du FPR. Aussi vous aurez des propagandistes chevronnés du FPR comme Imma, Gourinovitch, Linda, Monsieur FIDH, Les médias qui ont facilité et aidé dans la réalisation rapide du génocide des Hutus incluant Le Soir, La Libre Belgique, Goliath, Ne touche pas à Caïn.

De ce qui précède, nul n’est besoin de conclure que le FPR est une organisation criminelle à 100%, qui dispose d’un gouvernement utilisé à ses fins criminelles et assure la protection à la mafia de toutes ses organisations criminelles tant nationales qu´internationales ( une espèce de mondialisation de la criminalité). Pour y arriver, le général dictateur rwandais Paul Kagame utilise à son avantage son pouvoir de contrôle de toute la vie socio-économique et culturelle au Rwanda.

Comme il vous a été dit auparavant, toutes ces organisations, est-il besoin de rappeler, forment une collectivité réunissant des criminels, sympathisants ou pas mais cupides d´argent, tous soumis à l’autorité du Führer et dont les subalternes servent d´intermédiaires entre le FPR et l´organisation en question. En fait, il y a une division du travail coruscante pour assurer le lobby du FPR, pour aider les escadrons de la mort disséminés dans le monde, n’importe où et chaque fois que de besoin, chaque membre jouant un rôle précis et s’ajustant aux autres rôles que leur attribue le FPR central de Kigali, le véritable régime de "corruption régulée".

Comme si ce n’était pas suffisant, vous reconnaîtrez ces organisations par une nocivité sociale considérable comme African Rights et Survie, des organisations qui n’ont pas peur de recevoir des millions de dollars pour ce sale besogne, en fait partout ce fait par le biais du blanchiment d’argent issu des croisades de Kagame dont le professionnalisme et l’efficacité n’est plus à démontrer. Ceci dit, ces groupes opèrent tant sur le plan de la propagande, des intimidations, des assassinats (utilisation des poisons y compris), de la représentativité mafieuse au niveau international par le biais de l´infiltration pour la désinformation, utilisant l´argent sale blanchi, les prostituées, etc.

Vous reconnaîtrez ces organisations par le fait que qu’elles se constituent facilement en porte-parole de tous les rwandais dans la région où elles sont installées. Ces organisations ont la capacité d´échapper aux sanctions pénales nationales et internationales s’il fallait analyser la nature propre et le caractère illicite de leurs activités. Cette échappatoire est normalement due à leur structure interne et aux rapports de collusion noués avec la société mafieuse locale avec lesquelles elles opèrent.

A titre d’exemple, prenez African Rights de Rakiya Omaar et Survie. Comme d’autres organisations criminelles du FPR, Ces organisations sont dorénavant instrumentalisées par le leadership politico-militaire du FPR. Ce qui leur permet de mieux participer aux processus politiques, diplomatiques et militaires régionaux et internationaux. Leur rôle principal : stigmatiser tout Hutu à l’extérieur du Rwanda. C´est en fin de compte la principale activité qui leur est reléguée.

Ensuite vient la systématisation d’une collaboration de fait entre ces organisations et associations criminelles du FPR à tous les échelons et dans presque tous les pays occidentaux et se retrouvent ramifiées aux ordres encore une fois du leadership politico-administratif du FPR qui coordonne tout dans un système caractérisé par une " gestion patrimoniale de réseaux, publics et privés, grâce aux dénominations licites qui leur permer d'entretenir des activités illicites de grande criminalité à l´échelle nationale, régionale et internationale.

Ces organisations du FPR, selon des sources concordantes, ont la capacité d’intervention multi-niveaux qui tiennent à la redondance des crimes entre les protagonistes de ce système mafieux : le recrutement s’effectue sur une base transnationale et les membres du réseau occupent parfois plusieurs positions de pouvoir dans différents segments du système social pour un contrôle rigoureux pour que rien ne puisse échapper au régime nazi rwandais.

Cette base varie aussi en fonction de la position du réseau par rapport au politique, aux ONGs et groupes de pression reconnues en Amérique du nord, au Royaume Uni et en général opérant à l´étranger : un réseau d’acteurs poursuit d’autant plus efficacement la satisfaction des intérêts du Top Nazi rwandais qui dispose d’appuis solides au niveau de la mafia tant diplomatique que politique au niveau internationale surtout dans en Occident.

Vous saurez comment ces organisations opèrent, défendent le régime du FPR chaque fois que celui-ci se retrouve en difficulté au niveau internationale. Lorsque la communauté internationale remet en question la légitimité du régime répressive du FPR dont le gouvernement est composé d´extrémistes Tutsis criminels ayant forgé un style néo nazi, actuellement connu dans le monde entier avec son `style de la répression à la FPR` (une marque déposée du FPR qui différentie les crimes du FPR des autres atrocités jusqu´aujourd´hui connues).

Aujourd’hui, le régime dictatorial rwandais dont la grande criminalité obéit à une " hiérarchie-politique criminelle jamais encore vécue en Afrique et dont les tentacules se retrouvent partout ailleurs dans le monde". Cette criminalité du régime stalinienne installé au Rwanda dont la définition révèle bien la configuration des rapports de force entre d´une part, le pouvoir central du FPR et d’autre part, ces organisations criminelles, elles aussi subdivisées en réseaux.

Aussi faut-il souligner que ces autres organisations incluent des personnalités individuelles corrompus et qui corrompent les médias qui, aujourd’hui, se sont transformés en juges et en tribunaux pour calomnier et dépeindre la communauté hutue exilé dans le monde. Ceci montre bien la nocivité de ce système et la profonde hypocrisie de certains pays de l´Occident surtout du monde anglo-saxon quant au respect des droits de l´homme, à la lutte anti-terroriste (définition vague qui profite au régime sanguinaire) et au respect des libertés individuelles.

Dans ce cadre, les médias corrompus que nous retrouvons ici et là en Europe, et en Amérique du nord dans ce genre de mise en scène ne nous contrediront pas. Pour y arriver, des multinationales chargées de piller les ressources naturelles de la région des Grands Lacs Africains achètent ces médias en guise de récompense aux crimes odieux qu´elles arrangent avec le FPR tant au niveau national qu´international. Aussi dans cette même ordre d’idées, vous aurez des soutiens financiers, diplomatiques et politiques qui font tout ce qui est possible pour bien paraître comme organisations reconnues.

Dans le même temps, nous avons vu que ces organisations cachent leur objectif premier à savoir `assurer le bien-être des criminels du FPR` en discréditant TOUT HUTU QUI REFUSE DE COLLABORER, TOUT HUTU QUI DÉNONCE LE REGIME ET LE SYSTEME NAZI INSTALLE AU RWANDA SOUS L´ÉGIDE DU FPR ET DE SON PRÉSIDENT DICTATEUR Paul Kagame.

Ces organisations sont chargées de diaboliser tous ceux qui découvrent et par après dénoncent leur système mafieux, discréditent les différents chercheurs de renommée internationale ayant démasqué le système mafieux criminel chargé de faire accepter par tous les moyens le scénario de Paul Kagamé sur la tragédie rwandaise, alors qu´il en est le mastermind et le vrai planificateur de tous les massacres inégalables qu’a connu le peuple rwandais et congolais.

African SurViVors International

The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE

Posted on April 27 2010

[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination with an iron hand, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus), and mass-arrests and mass-murder by the RPF criminal organization.=>ASIF]

Rwanda: Opposition leader must receive fair trial

“ Amnesty International press release issued today urging the Rwandan Government to ensure that opposition leader Victoire Ingabire, receives a swift, fair trial on charges including genocide ideology and collaboration with a “terrorist” group, and is not punished for the legitimate exercise of freedom of expression”

Amnesty International urges the Rwandan Government to ensure that opposition leader Victoire Ingabire, receives a swift, fair trial on charges including genocide ideology and collaboration with a “terrorist” group, and is not punished for the legitimate exercise of freedom of expression.

Victoire Ingabire, President of the United Democratic Forces (FDU-Inkingi), who plans to stand in presidential elections in August 2010 was arrested on 21 April 2010 after being summoned to the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) in Kigali, Rwanda’s capital, the previous day. This was her sixth summons by the police this year.

“We have documented a number of incidents of intimidation and harassment of opposition groups in Rwanda in recent months,” said Erwin van der Borght, Africa programme director at Amnesty International.

“Now with the arrest of a potential presidential candidate a few months ahead of the election, we call on the government to demonstrate that this is not another such case”.

Ingabire, was charged with “genocide ideology” and “minimising the genocide”, “divisionism” and “collaboration with a “terrorist” group”, the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR). She appeared before Gasabo Intermediary Court (TGI) on 21 April and pleaded not guilty on all counts.

On 22 April, the court ruled that Ingabire could be released on condition that she not travel outside the capital Kigali while proceedings against her continue.

The Rwandan authorities had already prevented Ingabire from travelling to Europe in March 2010 due to ongoing police investigations.

The “genocide ideology” and “divisionism” charges relate to speeches Ingabire made on her arrival back in Rwanda in January 2010 and in Europe where she spent 16 years in exile in the Netherlands and formed FDU-Inkingi.
FDU-Inkingi is still seeking registration in Rwanda.Government officials have over recent months claimed that comments made by Ingabire at the Gisozi Genocide Memorial on 16 January 2010 amount to “genocide denial” and “divisionism” or promoting ethnic division. In her speech, she called for the prosecution of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed against Hutu by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), as well as commemoration of Hutu victims killed during the war.
“The onus will be on the prosecution to prove that there is credible, solid evidence to justify the charges against Ingabire, said Erwin van der Borght. “The prosecutor will have to demonstrate that what she said actually constitutes advocacy of hatred and that they are not punishing her for political dissent.”

A Rwandan law promulgated in October 2008 criminalises “genocide ideology” in vague and ambiguous terms which unduly stifle freedom of expression. The Rwandan Government appear to have recognised that aspects of the genocide ideology law may be problematic and, according to Rwanda News Agency, the Cabinet is currently reviewing this law.

Ingabire is also charged with collaboration with a “terrorist” group, the FDLR.

The FDLR, an armed group operating in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), is mainly composed of Rwandan Hutu.
It contains remnants of the Interahamwe and former Rwandan soldiers responsible for the 1994 Rwandan genocide, as well as fighters not involved in the genocide, including many too young to have participated in the genocide.Ingabire attended “Inter-Rwandan Dialogue” meetings with pro-FDLR participants while in exile in the Netherlands, but says these meetings included participants from various political and ethnic backgrounds, including representatives of the RPF, the ruling party in Rwanda.

In police interrogations over recent weeks, Ingabire has reportedly been accused of meeting with FDLR officials in DRC and intending to create her own militia group. She has consistently denied such allegations.
“The government must demonstrate that Ingabire herself committed recognizably criminal acts and that this is not a case of guilt by association” said Erwin van der Borght.

Amnesty International urges the Rwandan Government to ensure that Ingabire is tried promptly and in accordance with international fair trial standards.

Background

Amnesty International strongly condemned harassment and intimidation of opposition groups, including the Green Party and the Ideal Social Party, in February 2010.

A member of Ingabire’s party, Joseph Ntawangundi, was severely beaten in a government building on 3 February 2010, as he accompanied Ingabire to collect documents needed for the party’s registration.
Ntawangundi was arrested in February 2010 following revelations that he had been convicted of genocide in absentia by a community tribunal set-up to try cases from the 1994 genocide.
Ntawangundi initially claimed to have been outside Rwanda during the genocide working for an international trade union body, but the organisation confirmed this was untrue. Ntawangundi later confessed to participation in the genocide and in March 2010 was sentenced to 17 years in prison.

A November 2009 UN panel of experts report on DRC found that diaspora members of FDU-Inkingi had been in phone contact with FDLR military leaders, but did not specify the nature of this contact or suggest Ingabire had herself maintained such contact.
Recent months have seen a number of government measures against critics and opponents including restrictions on freedom of expression. On 23 April, Rwandan immigration rejected a work visa re-application by the Rwanda-based researcher for the international human rights group, Human Rights Watch.

On 13 April, the High Media Council (HMC) suspended two Kinyarwanda newspapers known for being critical of the government, Umuseso and Umuvugizi, until after the elections. The HMC alleged that Umuseso had insulted the President and caused trouble in the army that could lead to insubordination.

The 2003 presidential elections and the 2008 legislative elections in Rwanda were marred by intimidation and political opposition activities were severely restricted.

Public Document

****************************************

For more information please call Amnesty International's press office in London, UK, on +44 20 7413 5566 or +44 207 413 5729 email: press@amnesty.org
International Secretariat, Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW, UK

www.amnesty.org

The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Rwanda: Allow Human Rights Watch to Work

Friday, April 23, 2010

[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination with an iron hand, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus), and mass-arrests and mass-murder by the RPF criminal organization.=>ASIF]

Georgette Gagnon, Africa director.(New York) - The Rwandan government's decision to deny a work visa to Human Rights Watch's representative in Kigali demonstrates a pattern of increasing restrictions on free expression in Rwanda ahead of August's presidential elections, Human Rights Watch said today. Human Rights Watch will appeal the decision and continue working on human rights issues in Rwanda.

"In the last few weeks, we've seen a real crackdown on critics," said Georgette Gagnon, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. "The Rwandan government is doing everything it can to silence independent voices before the elections."

Georgette Gagnon, Africa director

On April 23, 2010, officials from the Directorate General of Immigration informed Carina Tertsakian, Human Rights Watch's senior researcher on Rwanda, that she would not be granted a work visa. They alleged anomalies in her visa application, specifically signatures and dates on the documents she had submitted.

Staff at Human Rights Watch's headquarters in New York had attested in writing to the authenticity of all the documents and signatures, but the immigration officials described their explanations as "unsatisfactory." However, the officials had not made any attempt to contact Human Rights Watch's headquarters or the individuals whose signatures they had questioned.

The immigration officials refused to put their decision in writing. They told Tertsakian that as a British national, she could not exceed her 90-day legal stay in the country, which expires on April 24.

Gagnon was in Kigali the week of April 19 to try to meet Rwandan officials about this matter. Kenneth Roth, executive director at Human Rights Watch, sent a private letter to President Paul Kagame setting out in detail concerns at the handling of Tertsakian's visa application and reiterating that all the documents submitted in the original and second application were authentic. Rwandan immigration officials did not respond to Gagnon's requests for a meeting.

Rights Watch has been working on human rights in Rwanda since before the 1994 genocide. However, in the past two years, the Rwandan government has increasingly obstructed the work of the organization. In September and December 2008, it twice blocked the entry of the late Alison Des Forges, a renowned Rwanda expert and Human Rights Watch's senior advisor on the Great Lakes region. In the last few weeks, Rwandan government rhetoric against human rights organizations has increased, with senior officials singling out Human Rights Watch for particularly fierce public criticism. There has also been an increase in articles hostile to Human Rights Watch in pro-government media.

Background

Rejection of work visa application

Carina Tertsakian, a British national, arrived in Rwanda on January 25, 2010, and was initially granted a
work visa. On March 3, immigration officials questioned her on the paperwork relating to her visa application, pointing to a mistaken date and alleging differences in her colleagues' signatures on the documents. They confiscated her passport. The following day, they summoned her again with a new set of questions again relating to dates and signatures.

On March 8, Tertsakian was formally summoned by the police Criminal Investigations Department (CID) to appear the following day. The police told her that she was suspected of using forged documents and questioned her on the same points as those raised by the immigration officials. By then, Human Rights Watch had submitted two letters from its headquarters, confirming that all the documents were authentic. The officials did not appear to take these letters into account.

On March 10, immigration officials returned Tertsakian's passport, but cancelled her work visa. The immigration officials refused to provide a written explanation for this cancellation; they told her she could submit a second visa application.

On March 16, Tertsakian submitted a second application, with a notarized affidavit from Human Rights Watch's Legal Director attesting to the veracity and authenticity of all the documents. More than a month passed before immigration officials responded to the second application - the usual turnaround time is three days. Rwandan immigration officials communicated their visa denial to Tertsakian on April 23, the day before her legal stay in Rwanda was due to expire.

Crackdown on freedom of expression

These developments take place against a backdrop of increasing intolerance of dissent and criticism in the run-up to presidential elections in August.

Members of opposition parties have been harassed, threatened, and intimidated. Two of the new opposition parties - the FDU-Inkingi and the Democratic Green Party of Rwanda - have been prevented from registering and have been repeatedly obstructed by the authorities. Meetings of the Democratic Green Party and the PS-Imberakuri (a third opposition party) have been disrupted several times, sometimes violently. The PS-Imberakuri eventually managed to register, but has since been hijacked by "dissident members" widely believed to have been manipulated by the ruling Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) to silence the party's president, Bernard Ntaganda. Ntaganda himself was summoned before the Senate at the end of 2009 on accusations of "genocide ideology." He has not been charged, but in April 2010, members of the Senate's political commission expressed their view that these accusations were well-founded.

Victoire Ingabire, leader of the FDU-Inkingi, has been questioned by the police on six occasions since February 2010 (she returned to Rwanda in January 2010 after many years in exile), effectively paralyzing her party's activities. In March, police stopped her at the airport and prevented her from travelling. On April 21, she was arrested and charged with "genocide ideology," "divisionism," and collaboration with terrorist groups, including the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (Forces démocratiques pour la libération du Rwanda - FDLR), an armed group active in the Democratic Republic of Congo, composed in part of individuals who took part in the 1994 genocide. Ingabire was released on bail on April 22, but is not allowed to leave the country or to go outside the capital, Kigali. There has been an unrelenting public campaign against her in the pro-government media, relating primarily to public statements in which she criticized the government and called for justice for killings of Hutu by the RPF.

Journalists have also faced numerous problems in the course of their work. The state prosecutor has sued the two independent newspapers, Umuseso and Umuvugizi for defamation, a criminal offense punishable with imprisonment. Both cases are currently at the appeal stage. On April 13, the Media High Council, a government-aligned body responsible for regulating the media, suspended the two newspapers for six months. Umuseso and Umuvugizi are among the few independent media left in Rwanda; both have published articles critical of the government.

More broadly, Human Rights Watch has found that many ordinary Rwandans are unable to express their opinions openly. Those who voice criticism of the government or its policies risk being labelled opponents, accused of being in league with opposition parties or with people who allegedly want to topple the government, or accused of "genocide ideology" - a vaguely defined criminal offense which carries penalties of 10 to 25 years' imprisonment.

After years of intimidation of civil society activists, very few independent human rights organizations are left in Rwanda. Those who are still trying to document human rights abuses are facing constant threats and obstacles. For example, in the run-up to the 2008 parliamentary elections, the League for Human Rights in the Great Lakes Region (Ligue des droits de la personne dans la région des Grands Lacs - LDGL) was prevented from deploying its full election observer mission and was attacked by the National Electoral Commission before its report came out. Members of the human rights organization LIPRODHOR have also faced serious threats over several years, causing many of their key members to leave the country for their own safety, and leaving the organization significantly weakened.

Related Material:

Rwanda: End Attacks on Opposition Parties.

Rwanda: End human rights clampdown before presidential elections

Friday, April 23, 2010

[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination with an iron hand, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus), and mass-arrests and mass-murder by the RPF criminal organization.=>ASIF]

Amnesty International strongly condemns the diminishing space for freedom of expression in Rwanda as the country prepares for presidential elections in August 2010.
As part of a continued clampdown on human rights, Rwandan immigration today rejected a work visa re-application by the Rwanda-based researcher for the international human rights group, Human Rights Watch (HRW).

The de-facto expulsion of an international human rights worker from Rwanda is another indication of the worsening human rights situation in the country in the run-up to the elections. This latest incident is part of a pattern of repression, as the space for any kind of independent reporting and debate in Rwanda diminishes fast.

International human rights organisations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have recently been attacked in public speeches by senior government officials. The pro-government press has recently published several articles and opinion pieces attempting to discredit their work.

Recent months have seen a number of government measures against critics and opponents of the government including restrictions on freedom of expression and association. Amnesty International urges the Rwandan Government to respect freedom of expression and association, including by allowing space for human rights work.

On 21 April, presidential aspirant, Victoire Ingabire, President of the United Democratic Forces (FDU-Inkingi), a party seeking registration in Rwanda, was arrested, charged with “genocide ideology and minimising the genocide, divisionism and collaboration with a “terrorist” group”, and released the following day while proceedings continue.

In the trial against Ingabire, the prosecution would need to prove that what Ingabire said constitutes advocacy of hatred to demonstrate that she is not being punished for political dissent. They would also need to show that Ingabire herself committed a recognisable criminal act.

Last week, the High Media Council (HMC) suspended two Kinyarwanda newspapers until after the elections. The two newspapers, Umuseso and Umuvigizi, were suspended for six months. The HMC alleged that Umuseso had insulted the President and caused trouble in the army that could lead to insubordination.

Amnesty International strongly condemned harassment and intimidation of opposition groups, including the Green Party and the Ideal Social Party, in February 2010. Past Rwandan elections have been marred by intimidation and the ability of members of the political opposition to carry out their activities in accordance with their human rights has been restricted.

Background

Immigration authorities first cancelled the work visa of Human Rights Watch’s Rwanda-based researcher, Carina Tertsakian, on 10 March. The authorities alleged discrepancies in her documents, relating to signatures of her employer which they claimed were inconsistent. They also cited an error in the date on the contract mistakenly dated October 2010, rather than 2009.

Rwanda’s Criminal Investigation Department (CID) summoned Carina Tertsakian twice in March to respond to allegations of using false documents. She submitted a second visa application on 16 March with additional letters from the Human Rights Watch headquarters notarised to certify their authenticity.

Today the Immigration Authorities informed Carina Tertsakian that they were not satisfied with the explanations Human Rights Watch had submitted. They refused to provide a response in writing and reminded Tertsakian that as a British national she has 90 days to stay in the country. The 90 day period expires tomorrow.

The latest developments coincide with the deadline for all international NGOs based in Rwanda, including Human Rights Watch, to apply for renewal of their registration certificate. The original 31 March deadline was extended to 30 April.

The Rwandan Government has a history of clamping down on human rights work in advance of elections. In September 2008, the late Alison Des Forges, Human Rights Watch’s Senior Advisor, was barred from entering Rwanda shortly before the Rwandan legislative elections. She was again refused entry in December 2008.
ENDS/

© Amnesty International

The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine

U.S. lawyers to defend Victoire Ingabire, first female presidential candidate in Rwanda – jailed by President Gen. Paul Kagame

April 23,2010

by International Humanitarian Law Institute

[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination with an iron hand, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus), and mass-arrests and mass-murder by the RPF criminal organization.=>ASIF]

Kigali, Rwanda, and St. Paul, USA – Rwandan opposition presidential candidate Madame Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, Rwanda’s first female presidential candidate, was released on bail one day after being jailed by the Kagame government of Rwanda. According to one of Ingabire’s U.S. lawyers, law professor Peter Erlinder:

Victoire Ingabiré Umuhoza stands before the court in Kigali, Rwanda, after being arrested and charged with associating with terrorists and “genocide ideology,” a crime unique to Rwanda which includes “divisionism” and “revisionism,” i.e., attempting to revise the received history of the 1994 Rwanda Genocide.“Ingabire was arrested on trumped-up, political thought crimes, including association with a terrorist group, propagating genocide ideology, genocide denial, revisionism and divisionism, all arising from the “crime” of publicly objecting to the Kagame military dictatorship and Kagame’s version of Rwandan civil war history.”

Gen. Paul Kagame, her would-be opponent, is engineering a re-run of the 2003 sham “elections” that brought Kagame to power with 95 percent of the vote.

Kagame preventing free and fair elections in Rwanda … again

According to European Union election monitors, Human Rights Watch and the British Commonwealth Human Rights Institute, opposition parties were outlawed and opposition candidates jailed or exiled in 2003.

According to Erlinder: “The arrest of Madame Ingabire in the run-up to the 2010 election is a carbon copy of Kagame’s tactics in 2003 when all serious political challengers were jailed or driven from the country, including former Kagame loyalists, like the former president and prime minister, Pasteur Bizimungu and Faustin Twagiramungu.

“In 2003 Kagame also banned all opposition parties illegally divisionist, which he has recently repeated with Rwanda’s Green Party and Madame Ingabire’s FDU. Kagame pioneered the same election tactics that Kagame’s allies, the U.S. and U.K, condemned when Mugabe used Kagame’s tactics in Zimbabwe’s elections.”
Hundreds, if not thousands, of former Kagame supporters have gone into exile in the recent past, including the former speaker of the Rwandan Parliament, the Rwandan ambassador to the Netherlands, who granted Madame Ingabire’s visa to return to Rwanda in January, numerous senior military officers and political figures, and Paul Rusesabagina, the real hero portrayed in the movie “Hotel Rwanda.”

Kagame issues death threats against foreigners too

In late February 2010 leaked notes, in the original in the Kinyarwandan language, purported to report Kagame’s meeting with Rwandan ambassadors, who had not yet gone into exile. In the meeting, Kagame allegedly targeted some seven non-Rwandan lawyers, journalists and academics for public discrediting or assassination. Kagame had Erlinder’s name on his “hit list” even before Erlinder took on Ingabire’s defense, presumably for his role in genocide-planning acquittals in the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) Military-1 trial.
Erlinder said: “According to U.N. Security Council-commissioned reports of 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2008, the Kagame regime is responsible for more than 6 million deaths in the Congo, hundreds of thousands in Rwanda, which is confirmed in Spanish and French indictments, issued in 2006 and 2008. (See indictments of French Judge Bruguiere, November 2006, and Spanish Judge Merelles Abreu, February 2008.)

“According to ICTR prosecutor’s files and revealed by the books of ICTR prosecutors Del Ponte and Hartmann, Kagame also touched off the Rwandan ‘genocide’ by assassinating the presidents of Rwanda and Burundi as part of a final military assault to seize power in April 1994.”
“With this history, I have to take Kagame’s threats seriously and have to insist that the Obama administration, President Dennis Byron of the U.N. Rwanda Tribunal and Kagame himself provide public safe-passage guarantees for Madame Ingabire and all defense team members while we are defending democratic principles and human rights in Rwanda.”

Kagame has also declared Rwanda experts persona non-grata when they questioned his policies. Those he has named include Dr. Allison DesForges, Professor Filip Reyntjens, former U.S. Ambassador to Rwanda Robert Flaten and Hotal Rwanda hero Paul Rusesabagina.

Evidence of Kagame/RPF crimes and cover-up

Recently, U.S. political scientists Dr. Alan Stam of the University of Michigan and Dr. Christian Davenport of Notre Dame have analyzed data from all reported crimes in Rwanda during 1994 and have concluded that more Hutu were killed or brutalized than Tutsi before and after the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) seized power in July 1994. This analysis, together with the “conspiracy and planning” acquittals of former top military officers in the ICTR Military-1 case has called the entire theory of a “planned genocide” into question.
According to Erlinder: “It is just a matter of time before the world knows what those of us working at the ICTR already know and which has recently been confirmed by the 2007-2009 memoirs of former ICTR Chief Prosecutor Carla del Ponte and her aide, Florence Hartmann. Del Ponte reveals that, as early as January 1997, her predecessor, Louise Arbour, had the evidence to prosecute Paul Kagame for igniting the Rwandan ‘genocide’ by assassinating the presidents of Rwanda and Burundi on April 6, 1994. Also, U.N. and U.S. government documents in the Military-1 trial evidence show the United States has engaged in a massive cover-up of Kagame’s crimes to protect its own strategic interests in Central Africa, a cover-up which is also confirmed in Del Ponte’s and Hartmann’s memoirs.”

Ingabire defense team demands safe passage

Now that their client has been temporarily released, the Ingabire defense team insists that President Gen. Kagame and Rwanda’s justice minister and chief prosecutor, as well as others associated with the Kagame regime, military and police, and their major funders in the U.S. and U.K. all demonstrate respect for democratic principles and the rule of law by

(a) the immediate return of all computers, political or personal documents and other items seized from Madame Ingabire’s home;
(b) removal of all restrictions on Madame Ingabire’s ability to campaign for the votes of the Rwandan people, including the return of her passport and elimination of police reporting requirements;
(c) full recognition of her political party, the FDU, and the Green Party and other Rwandan opposition political parties;
(d) full access to the press and the media by opposition parties and candidates and an end to intimidation tactics against opposition political activities, as well as
(e) safe passage for members of Ingabire’s defense team.

The International Humanitarian Law Institute is directed by Peter Erlinder, professor of constitutional criminal law and international humanitarian law at William Mitchell College of Law in St. Paul, Minn., U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger’s Minnesota alma mater. Erlinder is also lead defense counsel in the Military-1 trial at the U.N. Tribunal for Rwanda, the case in which four former top military leaders were acquitted of conspiring or planning to commit genocide or any other crimes, and the highest ranking defendant was acquitted of all charges, in December 2008. Erlinder is also president of ICTR-ADAD (Association des Avocats de la Defense) and past-president of the National Lawyers Guild in New York City. Professor Erlinder can be reached at peter.erlinder@wmitchell.edu .

Related articles:

A Candle For Remembering

Rwanda: Cartographie des crimes

Let us remember Our People

You can't stop thinking

Welcome to Home Truths

Everybody Hurts

KAGAME - GENOCIDAIRE

Paul Kagame admits ordering...

Why did Kagame this to me?

RPF committed the unspeakable

Inzira ndende

Search

Hutu Children & their Mums

Rwanda-rebranding

Ways To Get Rid of Kagame

Almighty God :Justice for US

Killing Hutus on daily basis

RPF Trade Mark: Akandoya

The Torture in Rwanda flourishes

Fighting For Our Freedom?

KAGAME VS JUSTICE

Is it possible to dismantle the RPF criminal organizations around the world?

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE

Rwanda: Allow Human Rights Watch to Work

Rwanda: End human rights clampdown before presidential elections

U.S. lawyers to defend Victoire Ingabire, first female presidential candidate in Rwanda – jailed by President Gen. Paul Kagame

AS International

Profile

Genocide masterminded by RPF

Human and Civil Rights

Rwanda: A mapping of crimes

KIBEHO: Rwandan Auschwitz

Mass murderers C. Sankara

Stephen Sackur’s Hard Talk.

Prof. Allan C. Stam

Prof. Christian Davenport

The killing Fields - Part 1

The killing Fields - Part II

Daily bread for Rwandans

The killing Fields - Part III

Time has come: Regime change

Drame rwandais- justice impartiale

Sheltering 2,5 million refugees

Latest videos

Rwanda's Untold Story

Rwanda, un génocide en questions

Nombre de Visiteurs

Pages

Popular Posts - Last 7 days

Archives

Everything happens for a reason

Hutus didn't plan Tutsi Genocide

Your comment if you LIKE IT. All for Human rights