A Candle For Remembering
May this memorial candle lights up the historical past of our beloved Country: Rwanda, We love U so much. If Tears could build a stairway. And memories were a lane. I would walk right up to heaven. To bring you home again. No farewell words were spoken. No time to say goodbye. You were gone before I knew it And. Only Paul Kagame knows why. My heart still aches with sadness. And secret tears still flow. What It meant to lose you. No one will ever know.
Why did Kagame this to me?
Can't forget. He murdered my mother. What should be my reaction? FYI: the number of orphans in Rwanda has skyrocketed since the 1990's Kagame's invasion. Much higher numbers of orphans had and have no other option but joining FDLR fighters who are identified as children that have Lost their Parents in Kagame's Wars inside and outside of Rwanda.If someone killed your child/spouse/parent(s) would you seek justice or revenge? Deep insight: What would you do to the person who snuffed the life of someone I love beyond reason? Forgiving would bring me no solace. If you take what really matters to me, I will show you what really matters. NITUTIRWANAHO TUZASHIRA. IGIHE KIRAGEZE.If democracy is to sell one's motherland(Africa), for some zionits support, then I prefer the person who is ready to give all his live for his motherland. Viva President Putin!!!
RPF committed the unspeakable
The perverted RPF committed the UNSPEAKABLE.Two orphans, both against the Nazi world. Point is the fact that their parents' murder Kagame & his RPF held no shock in the Western world. Up to now, the Rwandan Hitler Kagame and his death squads still enjoy impunity inside and outside of Rwanda. What goes through someone's mind as they know RPF murdered their parents? A delayed punishment is actually an encouragement to crime, In Praise of the ongoing Bloodshed in Rwanda. “I always think I am a pro-peace person but if someone harmed someone near and dear to me, I don't think I could be so peaceful. I would like to believe that to seek justice could save millions of people living the African Great Lakes Region - I would devote myself to bringing the 'perp' along to a non-happy ending but would that be enough? You'd have to be in the situation I suppose before you could actually know how you would feel or what you would do”. Jean-Christophe Nizeyimana, Libre Penseur
Hutu Children & their Mums
Look at them ! How they are scared to death. Many Rwandan Hutu and Tutsi, Foreign human rights advocates, jounalists and and lawyers are now on Death Row Waiting to be murdered by Kagame and his RPF death squads. Be the last to know.
Almighty God :Justice for US
Hutu children's daily bread: Intimidation, Slavery, Sex abuses led by RPF criminals and Kagame, DMI: Every single day, there are more assassinations, imprisonment, brainwashing & disappearances. Do they have any chance to end this awful life?
Killing Hutus on daily basis
RPF targeted killings, very often in public areas. Killing Hutus on daily basis by Kagame's murderers and the RPF infamous death squads known as the "UNKNOWN WRONGDOERS"
RPF Trade Mark: Akandoya
Rape, torture and assassination and unslaving of hutu women. Genderside: Rape has always been used by kagame's RPF as a Weapon of War, the killings of Hutu women with the help of Local Defense Forces, DMI and the RPF military
The Torture in Rwanda flourishes
How torture flourishes across Rwanda despite extensive global monitoring
Fighting For Our Freedom?
We need Freedom, Liberation of our fatherland, Human rights respect, Mutual respect between the Hutu majority and the Tutsi minority
Sunday, August 31, 2008
Kananga foot shufflers, April 19, 2003Kinshasa, May 4, 2003 »
Kigali, Rwanda, April 22, 2003
“How many lives in danger are necessary for a multinational force to be deployed? Is it the color of the skin that makes the difference?” Emma Bonino, European Union Humanitarian Affairs Commissioner, 1997.
“We think Mrs. Bonino is a psychopath, obsessed with refugees.” Laurent Desire Kabila.
Bringing Hutus from DRC to Kigali. Then what happens?
The men were crying, the women held their breasts with both hands while the children peered out the window to get a look at their father’s homeland for the first time. It was a highly emotional moment when the UN flight from Kananga landed in Kigali, bringing eleven ex-combatants and their families back to Rwanda after nine years of hiding in the Congolese forests.
They are among the one million five hundred thousand Hutus who fled Rwanda after the 1994 genocide, when the victorious Tutsi led FPR took over the country. They were afraid that they would be killed for the murder of up to one million Tutsis and moderate Hutus. They were right.
Their story is as atrocious as the genocide most of them took part in. If one third of the refugees returned to Rwanda within the two years following the genocide, another third of them were killed when the Rwandans and Laurent Desire Kabila’s forces marched on Kinshasa to overthrow Mobutu in 1996-97. The European Union Humanitarian Affairs Commissioner, Emma Bonino, was outraged at the massacres. She said in May 1997 that the Rwandan refugees “are abandoned to the mercy of an army without uniforms, without a flag, without laws, who hunt them down like wild game. Hunting season is open.” Bonino qualified the wholesale slaughter of the Hutu refugees in the Congo as yet another “genocide.”.
Half a million people disappeared without a trace? “I believe nobody looked for them, or if they looked for them, they did not want to see.” (Bonino) Given the figures, Laurent Desire Kabila killed more people in six months than the dictator Mobutu did in thirty years. The Hutu refugees were running for their lives.
The hundreds of thousands who managed to survive fled to the forests where they remained a threat to the new Rwandan government. They sided with Mobutu’s army for survival when Kabila’s men were “hunting” them. Then, when Kabila fell out with his former masters in Rwanda and Uganda, the Hutus found themselves on the side of their recent butcher given that the Rwandans remained their biggest threat. Their presence was the excuse Rwanda used for invading the mineral rich Kivu in the first place.
Apparently, Rwanda would now rather have them back in the country farming peacefully than over the border, an ever-present threat. The Congolese want them out, among other reasons, so that the Rwandans no longer have an excuse to invade. The UN Mission in the Congo (MONUC) has developed a plan to repatriate the refugees who step forward: DDRRR (Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reinsertion, and Reintegration). The Rwandans have set up a government committee to ‘welcome them home’. Tuesday’s batch is among the roughly 1300 ex-combatants, their wives and children who have returned so far.
Jean Sayinzoga is a tall man. Wearing a brown tweed jacket, dress slacks and a dress shirt opened around the neck, the Chairman of the Rwanda Demobilization and Reintegration Commission (RDRC) shook each nervous hand. He says, “They have nothing to fear. Those who have already returned live happily in the country.”
According to Sayinzoga, the men will go to a camp for two month’s “training” while the women and children will go straight to the village and be given fifty thousand Rwandan francs worth of supplies to start their new lives. UN personnel in Kigali say the reinsertion program is working well. Does this mean the Rwandans have an extraordinary capacity to forgive and forget? Maybe not.
The policemen who escorted me to the airport restaurant spoke English as a foreign language. A sure sign that he had been a refugee who came to Rwanda from either Tanzania or Uganda after the Genocide. I told him that I had taught at the University of Butare.
“Was that before or after the war?” he asked. This is not an innocent question. Although I taught under a program with the UNDP, if it had been before the war, I would have been serving the genocidal Hutu government. After the war and I would have been serving the ‘new Rwanda’.
Another sign the war is ever present: when I tried to take pictures of the refugees’ return, the airport security got very hostile. “No pictures here!” they shouted in English. The reason? Perhaps the dozen brand-new Russian made MI-24 attack helicopters on the other side of the runway.
But the reception for the refugees was very friendly. Sayinzoga says the Rwandans “have no business in the Congo. The Congolese don’t want them. Their future is Rwanda, not in the Congo.”
I cannot say how well they are treated back in their villages of origin. I have not been there to find out and I have learned not to trust reports from UN personnel, especially MilObs (UN Military Observers). Until an independent, credible source goes and reports on the process first hand, chances are only a trickle of refugees will be returning “home” for some time to come.
The other problem, as I explained in the Lubumbashi report last week, is the MilObs in the Congo whose job it is to safely escort the refugees from the forests to Kigali. One of the ex-combatants on the plane had been badly mistreated by Congolese government soldiers after he had turned himself in. He was covered with bruises from his beatings and showed the signs of having been tied and hanged in painful positions. He is the third case the doctor has diagnosed in Kananga in recent weeks. This gratuitous torture will not encourage more Rwandans to step forward for DDRRR. Radio Okapi was asked not to report the case because it could discourage other refugees from stepping forward. How can I give news, which encourages them to step forward if they risk being tortured?
Another question to be answered is why do the MilObs leave the refugees in the custody of the Congolese Army for days on end? In Lubumbashi, is it because they are too busy having fun and unwilling to allow Rwandans to camp in their nice townhouse? It has been pointed out to me by UN personnel, not to mention my own observations, that many MilObs are racists and most of the racists are not Caucasian-whites. As I have previously reported, I have come across very few MilObs who take their job to heart (but there are some good men who are serious about their mission). Most seem to be in it for the easy money.
As Mr. Sayinzoga took his fellow countrymen into the ‘loving care’ of the ‘new Rwanda’, he turned to me and said: “I pray you are never a refugee. It turns your life to Hell”. Thanks for the advice.
This entry was posted on November 11, 2007 at 2:08 pm and is filed under D.R. CONGO, United Nations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Kananga foot shufflers, April 19, 2003
Kinshasa, May 4, 2003 »
Kigali, Rwanda, April 22, 2003
“How many lives in danger are necessary for a multinational force to be deployed? Is it the color of the skin that makes the difference?” Emma Bonino, European Union Humanitarian Affairs Commissioner, 1997.
“We think Mrs. Bonino is a psychopath, obsessed with refugees.” Laurent Desire Kabila.
Bringing Hutus from DRC to Kigali. Then what happens?
The men were crying, the women held their breasts with both hands while the children peered out the window to get a look at their father’s homeland for the first time. It was a highly emotional moment when the UN flight from Kananga landed in Kigali, bringing eleven ex-combatants and their families back to Rwanda after nine years of hiding in the Congolese forests.
They are among the one million five hundred thousand Hutus who fled Rwanda after the 1994 genocide, when the victorious Tutsi led FPR took over the country. They were afraid that they would be killed for the murder of up to one million Tutsis and moderate Hutus. They were right.
Their story is as atrocious as the genocide most of them took part in. If one third of the refugees returned to Rwanda within the two years following the genocide, another third of them were killed when the Rwandans and Laurent Desire Kabila’s forces marched on Kinshasa to overthrow Mobutu in 1996-97. The European Union Humanitarian Affairs Commissioner, Emma Bonino, was outraged at the massacres. She said in May 1997 that the Rwandan refugees “are abandoned to the mercy of an army without uniforms, without a flag, without laws, who hunt them down like wild game. Hunting season is open.” Bonino qualified the wholesale slaughter of the Hutu refugees in the Congo as yet another “genocide.”.
Half a million people disappeared without a trace? “I believe nobody looked for them, or if they looked for them, they did not want to see.” (Bonino) Given the figures, Laurent Desire Kabila killed more people in six months than the dictator Mobutu did in thirty years. The Hutu refugees were running for their lives.
The hundreds of thousands who managed to survive fled to the forests where they remained a threat to the new Rwandan government. They sided with Mobutu’s army for survival when Kabila’s men were “hunting” them. Then, when Kabila fell out with his former masters in Rwanda and Uganda, the Hutus found themselves on the side of their recent butcher given that the Rwandans remained their biggest threat. Their presence was the excuse Rwanda used for invading the mineral rich Kivu in the first place.
Apparently, Rwanda would now rather have them back in the country farming peacefully than over the border, an ever-present threat. The Congolese want them out, among other reasons, so that the Rwandans no longer have an excuse to invade. The UN Mission in the Congo (MONUC) has developed a plan to repatriate the refugees who step forward: DDRRR (Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reinsertion, and Reintegration). The Rwandans have set up a government committee to ‘welcome them home’. Tuesday’s batch is among the roughly 1300 ex-combatants, their wives and children who have returned so far.
Jean Sayinzoga is a tall man. Wearing a brown tweed jacket, dress slacks and a dress shirt opened around the neck, the Chairman of the Rwanda Demobilization and Reintegration Commission (RDRC) shook each nervous hand. He says, “They have nothing to fear. Those who have already returned live happily in the country.”
According to Sayinzoga, the men will go to a camp for two month’s “training” while the women and children will go straight to the village and be given fifty thousand Rwandan francs worth of supplies to start their new lives. UN personnel in Kigali say the reinsertion program is working well. Does this mean the Rwandans have an extraordinary capacity to forgive and forget? Maybe not.
The policemen who escorted me to the airport restaurant spoke English as a foreign language. A sure sign that he had been a refugee who came to Rwanda from either Tanzania or Uganda after the Genocide. I told him that I had taught at the University of Butare.
“Was that before or after the war?” he asked. This is not an innocent question. Although I taught under a program with the UNDP, if it had been before the war, I would have been serving the genocidal Hutu government. After the war and I would have been serving the ‘new Rwanda’.
Another sign the war is ever present: when I tried to take pictures of the refugees’ return, the airport security got very hostile. “No pictures here!” they shouted in English. The reason? Perhaps the dozen brand-new Russian made MI-24 attack helicopters on the other side of the runway.
But the reception for the refugees was very friendly. Sayinzoga says the Rwandans “have no business in the Congo. The Congolese don’t want them. Their future is Rwanda, not in the Congo.”
I cannot say how well they are treated back in their villages of origin. I have not been there to find out and I have learned not to trust reports from UN personnel, especially MilObs (UN Military Observers). Until an independent, credible source goes and reports on the process first hand, chances are only a trickle of refugees will be returning “home” for some time to come.
The other problem, as I explained in the Lubumbashi report last week, is the MilObs in the Congo whose job it is to safely escort the refugees from the forests to Kigali. One of the ex-combatants on the plane had been badly mistreated by Congolese government soldiers after he had turned himself in. He was covered with bruises from his beatings and showed the signs of having been tied and hanged in painful positions. He is the third case the doctor has diagnosed in Kananga in recent weeks. This gratuitous torture will not encourage more Rwandans to step forward for DDRRR. Radio Okapi was asked not to report the case because it could discourage other refugees from stepping forward. How can I give news, which encourages them to step forward if they risk being tortured?
Another question to be answered is why do the MilObs leave the refugees in the custody of the Congolese Army for days on end? In Lubumbashi, is it because they are too busy having fun and unwilling to allow Rwandans to camp in their nice townhouse? It has been pointed out to me by UN personnel, not to mention my own observations, that many MilObs are racists and most of the racists are not Caucasian-whites. As I have previously reported, I have come across very few MilObs who take their job to heart (but there are some good men who are serious about their mission). Most seem to be in it for the easy money.
As Mr. Sayinzoga took his fellow countrymen into the ‘loving care’ of the ‘new Rwanda’, he turned to me and said: “I pray you are never a refugee. It turns your life to Hell”. Thanks for the advice.
This entry was posted on November 11, 2007 at 2:08 pm and is filed under D.R. CONGO, United Nations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Kinshasa, May 4, 2003 »
Kigali, Rwanda, April 22, 2003
“How many lives in danger are necessary for a multinational force to be deployed? Is it the color of the skin that makes the difference?” Emma Bonino, European Union Humanitarian Affairs Commissioner, 1997.
“We think Mrs. Bonino is a psychopath, obsessed with refugees.” Laurent Desire Kabila.
Bringing Hutus from DRC to Kigali. Then what happens?
The men were crying, the women held their breasts with both hands while the children peered out the window to get a look at their father’s homeland for the first time. It was a highly emotional moment when the UN flight from Kananga landed in Kigali, bringing eleven ex-combatants and their families back to Rwanda after nine years of hiding in the Congolese forests.
They are among the one million five hundred thousand Hutus who fled Rwanda after the 1994 genocide, when the victorious Tutsi led FPR took over the country. They were afraid that they would be killed for the murder of up to one million Tutsis and moderate Hutus. They were right.
Their story is as atrocious as the genocide most of them took part in. If one third of the refugees returned to Rwanda within the two years following the genocide, another third of them were killed when the Rwandans and Laurent Desire Kabila’s forces marched on Kinshasa to overthrow Mobutu in 1996-97. The European Union Humanitarian Affairs Commissioner, Emma Bonino, was outraged at the massacres. She said in May 1997 that the Rwandan refugees “are abandoned to the mercy of an army without uniforms, without a flag, without laws, who hunt them down like wild game. Hunting season is open.” Bonino qualified the wholesale slaughter of the Hutu refugees in the Congo as yet another “genocide.”.
Half a million people disappeared without a trace? “I believe nobody looked for them, or if they looked for them, they did not want to see.” (Bonino) Given the figures, Laurent Desire Kabila killed more people in six months than the dictator Mobutu did in thirty years. The Hutu refugees were running for their lives.
The hundreds of thousands who managed to survive fled to the forests where they remained a threat to the new Rwandan government. They sided with Mobutu’s army for survival when Kabila’s men were “hunting” them. Then, when Kabila fell out with his former masters in Rwanda and Uganda, the Hutus found themselves on the side of their recent butcher given that the Rwandans remained their biggest threat. Their presence was the excuse Rwanda used for invading the mineral rich Kivu in the first place.
Apparently, Rwanda would now rather have them back in the country farming peacefully than over the border, an ever-present threat. The Congolese want them out, among other reasons, so that the Rwandans no longer have an excuse to invade. The UN Mission in the Congo (MONUC) has developed a plan to repatriate the refugees who step forward: DDRRR (Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Reinsertion, and Reintegration). The Rwandans have set up a government committee to ‘welcome them home’. Tuesday’s batch is among the roughly 1300 ex-combatants, their wives and children who have returned so far.
Jean Sayinzoga is a tall man. Wearing a brown tweed jacket, dress slacks and a dress shirt opened around the neck, the Chairman of the Rwanda Demobilization and Reintegration Commission (RDRC) shook each nervous hand. He says, “They have nothing to fear. Those who have already returned live happily in the country.”
According to Sayinzoga, the men will go to a camp for two month’s “training” while the women and children will go straight to the village and be given fifty thousand Rwandan francs worth of supplies to start their new lives. UN personnel in Kigali say the reinsertion program is working well. Does this mean the Rwandans have an extraordinary capacity to forgive and forget? Maybe not.
The policemen who escorted me to the airport restaurant spoke English as a foreign language. A sure sign that he had been a refugee who came to Rwanda from either Tanzania or Uganda after the Genocide. I told him that I had taught at the University of Butare.
“Was that before or after the war?” he asked. This is not an innocent question. Although I taught under a program with the UNDP, if it had been before the war, I would have been serving the genocidal Hutu government. After the war and I would have been serving the ‘new Rwanda’.
Another sign the war is ever present: when I tried to take pictures of the refugees’ return, the airport security got very hostile. “No pictures here!” they shouted in English. The reason? Perhaps the dozen brand-new Russian made MI-24 attack helicopters on the other side of the runway.
But the reception for the refugees was very friendly. Sayinzoga says the Rwandans “have no business in the Congo. The Congolese don’t want them. Their future is Rwanda, not in the Congo.”
I cannot say how well they are treated back in their villages of origin. I have not been there to find out and I have learned not to trust reports from UN personnel, especially MilObs (UN Military Observers). Until an independent, credible source goes and reports on the process first hand, chances are only a trickle of refugees will be returning “home” for some time to come.
The other problem, as I explained in the Lubumbashi report last week, is the MilObs in the Congo whose job it is to safely escort the refugees from the forests to Kigali. One of the ex-combatants on the plane had been badly mistreated by Congolese government soldiers after he had turned himself in. He was covered with bruises from his beatings and showed the signs of having been tied and hanged in painful positions. He is the third case the doctor has diagnosed in Kananga in recent weeks. This gratuitous torture will not encourage more Rwandans to step forward for DDRRR. Radio Okapi was asked not to report the case because it could discourage other refugees from stepping forward. How can I give news, which encourages them to step forward if they risk being tortured?
Another question to be answered is why do the MilObs leave the refugees in the custody of the Congolese Army for days on end? In Lubumbashi, is it because they are too busy having fun and unwilling to allow Rwandans to camp in their nice townhouse? It has been pointed out to me by UN personnel, not to mention my own observations, that many MilObs are racists and most of the racists are not Caucasian-whites. As I have previously reported, I have come across very few MilObs who take their job to heart (but there are some good men who are serious about their mission). Most seem to be in it for the easy money.
As Mr. Sayinzoga took his fellow countrymen into the ‘loving care’ of the ‘new Rwanda’, he turned to me and said: “I pray you are never a refugee. It turns your life to Hell”. Thanks for the advice.
This entry was posted on November 11, 2007 at 2:08 pm and is filed under D.R. CONGO, United Nations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Mr. KOTA venant,
I would like to give in danger your assertion according to which “After all, they (Rwemalika and RPF) are really able of all”.
Rwemalika belongs to this association of criminals (RPF), a band of the gangster-vagrants who imposed a dictatorial ship power resulting from violence to the Rwandan people.. Rwemalika is also loud-hailer of the FPR as well as SEBASONI which carried glasses magnifying glasses manufactured in 1900.
Therefore, dear Kota, RPF are able to assassinate, imprison and make exile the Hutus treated of genocidary in a final and totalitarian way and tutsi honest of opposition which did not accept' to be members of this criminal band known as RPF with the power in a Banana republic, our old dear fatherland.
Remainder, the God is the only Almighty and able to do everything and are assured that the same causes produce the same effects. I believe that you understand me until there! Let us keep hope one day, the lie, Kagame and its RPF will fall at the great day. To date, the history of Rwanda will be interpreted objectively. It will not be faked any more by the criminals of the RPF, the truth will not be choked any more, of the cans reports based on false documents will not be made any more, of the assembled legal files of all parts and cut to measure will belong to the history of the vagrants who are with the power at Kigali.
Much more, the economy of the country will not be based on our forces and not on the genocide transformed into a true good will of the RPF and freedom exchange of the false witnesses of the interahamwes known as repented will not be sold any more which show France wrongfully.
On the basis of rational and founded index which converges on the responsibility for the persons in charge politico-soldiers of the RPF in a series of activities in criminal matter of which the genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, we could ensure of the right lawsuits and equitable and Rwanda could be proclaims Rule of law and not State-Police officer as it is the case today.
Whatever the length of the night, the day will end up appearing, Kagame will be beaten when it is time and not because it is well armed and militarily extremely. It is not stronger than Hitler but it was beaten because it was time and because there were reasons serious and valid for fight him! “The same causes produce the same effects”
John Kalisa
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
I would like to give in danger your assertion according to which “After all, they (Rwemalika and RPF) are really able of all”.
Rwemalika belongs to this association of criminals (RPF), a band of the gangster-vagrants who imposed a dictatorial ship power resulting from violence to the Rwandan people.. Rwemalika is also loud-hailer of the FPR as well as SEBASONI which carried glasses magnifying glasses manufactured in 1900.
Therefore, dear Kota, RPF are able to assassinate, imprison and make exile the Hutus treated of genocidary in a final and totalitarian way and tutsi honest of opposition which did not accept' to be members of this criminal band known as RPF with the power in a Banana republic, our old dear fatherland.
Remainder, the God is the only Almighty and able to do everything and are assured that the same causes produce the same effects. I believe that you understand me until there! Let us keep hope one day, the lie, Kagame and its RPF will fall at the great day. To date, the history of Rwanda will be interpreted objectively. It will not be faked any more by the criminals of the RPF, the truth will not be choked any more, of the cans reports based on false documents will not be made any more, of the assembled legal files of all parts and cut to measure will belong to the history of the vagrants who are with the power at Kigali.
Much more, the economy of the country will not be based on our forces and not on the genocide transformed into a true good will of the RPF and freedom exchange of the false witnesses of the interahamwes known as repented will not be sold any more which show France wrongfully.
On the basis of rational and founded index which converges on the responsibility for the persons in charge politico-soldiers of the RPF in a series of activities in criminal matter of which the genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, we could ensure of the right lawsuits and equitable and Rwanda could be proclaims Rule of law and not State-Police officer as it is the case today.
Whatever the length of the night, the day will end up appearing, Kagame will be beaten when it is time and not because it is well armed and militarily extremely. It is not stronger than Hitler but it was beaten because it was time and because there were reasons serious and valid for fight him! “The same causes produce the same effects”
John Kalisa
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Sunday, August 17, 2008
Très Cher ami et grand compatriote Nkuliyingoma,
L'honneur m'échoit de pouvoir vous répondre illico à votre dernier posting.
Il sied de vous remercier de la facon dont vous avez pu analyser ma réponse pleine d'idnignations, mais j'ose vous avouer que je n'ai aucune dent contre vous ni contre qui que ce soit selon ses idées et opinions.
Seulement, au vu de ce qui s'est passé au Rwanda depuis 1990 jusqu'à maintenant, et que beaucoup de gens continuent à exhiber la carte de méconnaissance du dossier qui a entrainé des milliers de victimes de nos compatriotes: parents, frères, soeurs, amis du collège, d'université, commercants et paisibles paysans, sous pretexte de pouvoir retourner de force dans leur bercail, ou de l'obtenir à l'arraché( dans un bain de sang), je reste écoeuré et septique devant cette situation plus ahurie et hébétée.
Notre cher ami John, neveu de Gatabazi nous a fait partagé sur ce forum ce qu'il sait(savait) de la mort de son Oncle, froidement assassiné par le FPR, après de longues tractations qui se sont déroulées à l'hôtel méridien UMUBANO en présence de Twagiramungu, Nzamurambaho, Karenzi karake et Rutaremara, pour ne citer que ceux-là.
Les services habilités qui ont diligenté l'enquête ont bel et bien prouvé que Gatabazi a été assassiné par la horde du Fpr, parce qu'il n' épousait pas l'idée des ses frères de lutte: celle de liquider physiquement le Président Habyarimana, la seule facon qui était possible(selon eux) de prendre le pouvoir.
Ceci étant, le regreté et homme courageux que fût Gatabazi, n'a pas accepté cette proposition' qui n'avait aucun jugement de valeur, car lui, voulait se hisser au pouvoir par des moyens passifiques et démocratiques.
Ce refus lui coûta la vie, laissant derrière lui une page sombre d'histoire, une veuve et orphelins dont on compatit très bien dans cette triste douleur.
Et pourtant, le porte-parole de l'opposition Rwandaise a été le premier à déclarer sur les ondes des chaînes étrangères comme quoi Gatabazi a été assassiné par l'Escadron de la mort du MRND.Quel mensonge!
Si tu lis minutieusement la teneur de cet ex- étudiant du Campus de Mburabuturo- Kigali, et qui résidait chez Gatabazi, et la facon dont il a eu Rutaremara au télephone, tu verras bien que les dés étaient jétés depuis l'apparution du multipatismeau Rwanda.
Ces truands avaient peur d'être trahi, au cours de libations trop capiteuses qui ont eu lieu dans la nuit macabre du Méridien.
Mais hélas,toute fille amoureuse commet une impudence qui le trahit ( cfr Balzac); et Gatabazi a été lui aussi abandonné par les siens, qui voulaient à tout pris sacrifier le peuple Rwandais pour renflouer les caisser de l'état Rwandais souverain, dans la conquête du pouvoir d'une facon mafieuse, par une clique aux mains maquillées de sang.
Je sais très bien qu'il y avait des informations qui n'étaient pas acceccibles à tout le monde à l'époque, raison de plus , plusieurs gens se sont laissés bernés par le mensonge outrageux du Fpr et son lobbies.
Certes, je me demanderais pourquoi les gens prêtaient plus d'attention aux dires de la Radio Muhabura ou des Opposants qui s'opposaient seulement pour leur ventriotisme, au lieu d'écouter la version officielle donnée par les sevices habilités, chevronnés dans ce domaine.
Et la suite vous la connaissez très bien, c'est l'extermination systématique du peuple Hutu et Tutsi de l'intérieur, au profit de la solde du Fpr qui crie victoire inespérée.
Tu as vécu à Ruhengeri cher Jean Baptiste, et tu ne me contrediras pas en disant que la population si gentille et courtoise de Ruhengeri ne voulait pas la coexistance pacifique avec d'autres Rwandais de tous les horizons?
Pourquoi alors le Fpr a tenté le tout pour le tout pour exterminer ces paisibles paysans?
Je me limite par là, parce que les messacres de Ruhengeri depuis 1991 jusqu'à nos jours, à coûté la vie à plus de 700.000 paysans innocents, surtout dans les communes que tu connais bien comme Nkuli, Butaro, Kidaho, Nyamutera, Kigombe ,kinigi ,Nkumba et Mukingo.
Si tu veux avoir plus de précisions, je te donnerais nomement la liste des personnes que tu as cotoyé toi-même durant ton séjour dans cette région.
Ecoutez-moi bien , je ne suis pas parte-parole des ces victimes de Ruhengeri, mais c'est une illustration pure et simple, sinon , je pourrais aussi te citer les cas de Byumba(Rwebare, Cyondo, Kaniga, Kaborogota, Rwempasha, Murambi, Kivuye,Kinjonjo) ou ceux de Gitarama et/ou Kigali rural...tous extérminés par le FPR au vu et au su de tout le monde.
Pourait-on donc dire et affirmer avec aplomb que les opposants qui ne cessaient de s'acharner sur Habyarimana ne connaissaient pas la vraie nature du Fpr?
Oserions-nous déclarer que le gouvernement que dirigeait Twagiramungu ne connaissait pas toute la teneur du rapport de l'ex- Ministre de L'intérieur Feu Seth Sendashonga? ( que Dieu ait son âme)
Pouvons-nous affirmer que ce même gouvernement n'était pas au courant des tractations qui se faisaient au moment d'exterminer les déplacés de Kibeho(plus de 8000 au total)?
Cher Jean Baptiste,si tu avais suivis les pluies de bombes qui se sont abattues sur les Camps de Mugunga, katale, Kayindo, Inera,Nyangezi, Shabunda, Rukwi, Busurungi, Rushoga, Musenge, Walikale,Bunyakili, Hombo,Miti, Chambusha ,Tingi-Tingi; Ubundu, Wandji, Ikela, Kisangani km100 , ainsi que les morts qui s'en ont suivis dont notamment les enfants de moins de 3 ans, femmes enceintes éventrées,, enfants qui allaitaient leurs seins de leurs mamans déjà mortes,sans pouvoir les secourir ni les nourrir ou les cacher, tu comprendrais bien mon indignation la plus atroce et difficile à digérer.
Pourtant, je ne cessais de me demander pourquoi suis-je né au cours du siécle des truands?
Heureusement que Dieu n'abandonne jamais les siens!On doit la vie à sa clémence.
Je sais très bien que tu n'y es pour rien, car ton sens de discernement ne pouvais te permettre de faire pareilles choses, Mais tu ne manquerais pas de dire à haute voix que 'le désespoir paisible, sans convulsions de colère et sans reproches au ciel, est la sagesse même.
Evidement, on ne recoit pas la sagesse, mais il faut la découvrir soi-même, car elle est un point de vue sur les choses(Proust) .
Cher Camarade, je ne doute pas que tu comprennes mon idnignation, car j 'ai perdu les êtres chers dans cette lutte fratricide incensée, et que la communauté internationale continue à fermer les yeux sur la vraie cause et réalité des faits.
Je n'ai aucune dent contre toi, mais j'aimerais vous faire partage ma compassion et mon indingation sur les mensonges et injustices flangrantes qui secouent notre région sous l'oeil complaisant de la communauté internationale.
Je ne peux pas terminer mon posting, sans remercier du fond de mon coeur Me De Temmerman qui nous a dit que: "Le peuple Rwandais ne vote pas pour les traitres et les criminels. Ceux qui se sont trompés et font leur"mea culpea" peuvent bien attendre participer au débat, mais sans diriger ces derniers"
Et à Rutayisire aussi qui a prononcé une phrase qui m'a fort touchée: "il faut approcher tous les criminels et extremistes( si extremisme il y a) de deux cÔtés parce qu'ils sont Rwandais.
De ceci j'y ajouterais que c'est la minorité actuelle qui en profite, car elle va toujours continuer à écraser la majorité de peur de perdre le pouvoir pour qu'un jour elle soit traduit devant les juridictions plus martiales du mal qu'elle a causé au Rwandais en général et à la majoroité Hutu en particulier.
Du reste,cher noble ANCIEN, je vous souhaite passer un ecxellent week-end dans votre belle Capitale.
Salue-moi chaleureusement les tous les Gnoufs ( Inyufu) encore en vie.
Amicalement Christian.
Bugarama City
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
L'honneur m'échoit de pouvoir vous répondre illico à votre dernier posting.
Il sied de vous remercier de la facon dont vous avez pu analyser ma réponse pleine d'idnignations, mais j'ose vous avouer que je n'ai aucune dent contre vous ni contre qui que ce soit selon ses idées et opinions.
Seulement, au vu de ce qui s'est passé au Rwanda depuis 1990 jusqu'à maintenant, et que beaucoup de gens continuent à exhiber la carte de méconnaissance du dossier qui a entrainé des milliers de victimes de nos compatriotes: parents, frères, soeurs, amis du collège, d'université, commercants et paisibles paysans, sous pretexte de pouvoir retourner de force dans leur bercail, ou de l'obtenir à l'arraché( dans un bain de sang), je reste écoeuré et septique devant cette situation plus ahurie et hébétée.
Notre cher ami John, neveu de Gatabazi nous a fait partagé sur ce forum ce qu'il sait(savait) de la mort de son Oncle, froidement assassiné par le FPR, après de longues tractations qui se sont déroulées à l'hôtel méridien UMUBANO en présence de Twagiramungu, Nzamurambaho, Karenzi karake et Rutaremara, pour ne citer que ceux-là.
Les services habilités qui ont diligenté l'enquête ont bel et bien prouvé que Gatabazi a été assassiné par la horde du Fpr, parce qu'il n' épousait pas l'idée des ses frères de lutte: celle de liquider physiquement le Président Habyarimana, la seule facon qui était possible(selon eux) de prendre le pouvoir.
Ceci étant, le regreté et homme courageux que fût Gatabazi, n'a pas accepté cette proposition' qui n'avait aucun jugement de valeur, car lui, voulait se hisser au pouvoir par des moyens passifiques et démocratiques.
Ce refus lui coûta la vie, laissant derrière lui une page sombre d'histoire, une veuve et orphelins dont on compatit très bien dans cette triste douleur.
Et pourtant, le porte-parole de l'opposition Rwandaise a été le premier à déclarer sur les ondes des chaînes étrangères comme quoi Gatabazi a été assassiné par l'Escadron de la mort du MRND.Quel mensonge!
Si tu lis minutieusement la teneur de cet ex- étudiant du Campus de Mburabuturo- Kigali, et qui résidait chez Gatabazi, et la facon dont il a eu Rutaremara au télephone, tu verras bien que les dés étaient jétés depuis l'apparution du multipatismeau Rwanda.
Ces truands avaient peur d'être trahi, au cours de libations trop capiteuses qui ont eu lieu dans la nuit macabre du Méridien.
Mais hélas,toute fille amoureuse commet une impudence qui le trahit ( cfr Balzac); et Gatabazi a été lui aussi abandonné par les siens, qui voulaient à tout pris sacrifier le peuple Rwandais pour renflouer les caisser de l'état Rwandais souverain, dans la conquête du pouvoir d'une facon mafieuse, par une clique aux mains maquillées de sang.
Je sais très bien qu'il y avait des informations qui n'étaient pas acceccibles à tout le monde à l'époque, raison de plus , plusieurs gens se sont laissés bernés par le mensonge outrageux du Fpr et son lobbies.
Certes, je me demanderais pourquoi les gens prêtaient plus d'attention aux dires de la Radio Muhabura ou des Opposants qui s'opposaient seulement pour leur ventriotisme, au lieu d'écouter la version officielle donnée par les sevices habilités, chevronnés dans ce domaine.
Et la suite vous la connaissez très bien, c'est l'extermination systématique du peuple Hutu et Tutsi de l'intérieur, au profit de la solde du Fpr qui crie victoire inespérée.
Tu as vécu à Ruhengeri cher Jean Baptiste, et tu ne me contrediras pas en disant que la population si gentille et courtoise de Ruhengeri ne voulait pas la coexistance pacifique avec d'autres Rwandais de tous les horizons?
Pourquoi alors le Fpr a tenté le tout pour le tout pour exterminer ces paisibles paysans?
Je me limite par là, parce que les messacres de Ruhengeri depuis 1991 jusqu'à nos jours, à coûté la vie à plus de 700.000 paysans innocents, surtout dans les communes que tu connais bien comme Nkuli, Butaro, Kidaho, Nyamutera, Kigombe ,kinigi ,Nkumba et Mukingo.
Si tu veux avoir plus de précisions, je te donnerais nomement la liste des personnes que tu as cotoyé toi-même durant ton séjour dans cette région.
Ecoutez-moi bien , je ne suis pas parte-parole des ces victimes de Ruhengeri, mais c'est une illustration pure et simple, sinon , je pourrais aussi te citer les cas de Byumba(Rwebare, Cyondo, Kaniga, Kaborogota, Rwempasha, Murambi, Kivuye,Kinjonjo) ou ceux de Gitarama et/ou Kigali rural...tous extérminés par le FPR au vu et au su de tout le monde.
Pourait-on donc dire et affirmer avec aplomb que les opposants qui ne cessaient de s'acharner sur Habyarimana ne connaissaient pas la vraie nature du Fpr?
Oserions-nous déclarer que le gouvernement que dirigeait Twagiramungu ne connaissait pas toute la teneur du rapport de l'ex- Ministre de L'intérieur Feu Seth Sendashonga? ( que Dieu ait son âme)
Pouvons-nous affirmer que ce même gouvernement n'était pas au courant des tractations qui se faisaient au moment d'exterminer les déplacés de Kibeho(plus de 8000 au total)?
Cher Jean Baptiste,si tu avais suivis les pluies de bombes qui se sont abattues sur les Camps de Mugunga, katale, Kayindo, Inera,Nyangezi, Shabunda, Rukwi, Busurungi, Rushoga, Musenge, Walikale,Bunyakili, Hombo,Miti, Chambusha ,Tingi-Tingi; Ubundu, Wandji, Ikela, Kisangani km100 , ainsi que les morts qui s'en ont suivis dont notamment les enfants de moins de 3 ans, femmes enceintes éventrées,, enfants qui allaitaient leurs seins de leurs mamans déjà mortes,sans pouvoir les secourir ni les nourrir ou les cacher, tu comprendrais bien mon indignation la plus atroce et difficile à digérer.
Pourtant, je ne cessais de me demander pourquoi suis-je né au cours du siécle des truands?
Heureusement que Dieu n'abandonne jamais les siens!On doit la vie à sa clémence.
Je sais très bien que tu n'y es pour rien, car ton sens de discernement ne pouvais te permettre de faire pareilles choses, Mais tu ne manquerais pas de dire à haute voix que 'le désespoir paisible, sans convulsions de colère et sans reproches au ciel, est la sagesse même.
Evidement, on ne recoit pas la sagesse, mais il faut la découvrir soi-même, car elle est un point de vue sur les choses(Proust) .
Cher Camarade, je ne doute pas que tu comprennes mon idnignation, car j 'ai perdu les êtres chers dans cette lutte fratricide incensée, et que la communauté internationale continue à fermer les yeux sur la vraie cause et réalité des faits.
Je n'ai aucune dent contre toi, mais j'aimerais vous faire partage ma compassion et mon indingation sur les mensonges et injustices flangrantes qui secouent notre région sous l'oeil complaisant de la communauté internationale.
Je ne peux pas terminer mon posting, sans remercier du fond de mon coeur Me De Temmerman qui nous a dit que: "Le peuple Rwandais ne vote pas pour les traitres et les criminels. Ceux qui se sont trompés et font leur"mea culpea" peuvent bien attendre participer au débat, mais sans diriger ces derniers"
Et à Rutayisire aussi qui a prononcé une phrase qui m'a fort touchée: "il faut approcher tous les criminels et extremistes( si extremisme il y a) de deux cÔtés parce qu'ils sont Rwandais.
De ceci j'y ajouterais que c'est la minorité actuelle qui en profite, car elle va toujours continuer à écraser la majorité de peur de perdre le pouvoir pour qu'un jour elle soit traduit devant les juridictions plus martiales du mal qu'elle a causé au Rwandais en général et à la majoroité Hutu en particulier.
Du reste,cher noble ANCIEN, je vous souhaite passer un ecxellent week-end dans votre belle Capitale.
Salue-moi chaleureusement les tous les Gnoufs ( Inyufu) encore en vie.
Amicalement Christian.
Bugarama City
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Hi folks:
Be the first to know:
Paul Kagame orchestrated the entire genocide just so he could come to power as the glorious leader who ended the bloodshed. MOst of you guys believed he's a hero rather than the Rwanda genocide mastermind.
Hitler killed 6 million Jews in about 6 years. Paul Kagame killed 3.5 millions of Hutus et 5 millions of Congolese people in about in about 8 years. That's the reason why we must speak out far more bluntly against Kagame's now anarchist campaigns.
Question: Should the international community make pressure on Kagame to withdraw from politics after the 2003 presidential and parliamentary elections were masterfully orchestrated, after it has been found out Paul Kagame armed all those RPF infiltrators within Parties' youths with machetes and pangas, after killing his predecessor President Habyarimana and most importantly, after both Spanish and French judges indict him for having orchestrated all of those mass-murders in Rwanda and in the Republic of the Congo?
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Be the first to know:
Paul Kagame orchestrated the entire genocide just so he could come to power as the glorious leader who ended the bloodshed. MOst of you guys believed he's a hero rather than the Rwanda genocide mastermind.
Hitler killed 6 million Jews in about 6 years. Paul Kagame killed 3.5 millions of Hutus et 5 millions of Congolese people in about in about 8 years. That's the reason why we must speak out far more bluntly against Kagame's now anarchist campaigns.
Question: Should the international community make pressure on Kagame to withdraw from politics after the 2003 presidential and parliamentary elections were masterfully orchestrated, after it has been found out Paul Kagame armed all those RPF infiltrators within Parties' youths with machetes and pangas, after killing his predecessor President Habyarimana and most importantly, after both Spanish and French judges indict him for having orchestrated all of those mass-murders in Rwanda and in the Republic of the Congo?
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
MASS KILLINGS IN RWANDA
In an ethnic conflict such as is the case in Rwanda, truth is the first victim especially, regarding the accused. We do not have to wait hundreds of years like Oedipus Rex to be told the bitter truth.Thousands of innocent people were killed in Rwanda since October 1, 1990 when RPF invaded that country from Uganda. Between October 1, 1990 and April 1994, over 140,000 people were systematically killed by RPF/NRA in northern Rwanda, and over a million people were displaced rendering them to excruciating suffering without help from anywhere. That baleful killing of the innocent has continued up to today and also extended into Congo when RPF/NRA assisted by US Commandos, invaded Zaire slaughtering thousands of refugees in camps. The cabal went to great length to cover up their crimes as has been demonstrated over the years. Their lies have fooled the entire world community up to this very day, including the UNO. Nobles, intellectuals and commoners alike have come to believe the fabrications generated purposely to give legitimacy to a criminal gang dressed in the banality of evil so as to give them legitimacy, sympathy and acceptability, while covering up their heinous crimes against humanity which superseded those of Pol Pot of Cambodia and Salvadore Ayende of Chile.
The evidence, based on revelations from NRA military and intelligence officers plus interviews of peasant refugees which our organization has collected point to Tutsis. The RPF, together with NRA and the United State are implicated very clearly as the greatest criminals of the Rwanda genocide.Because of the lies and cover-ups which have been thoroughly concocted and orchestrated ever since the invasion started on October 1, 1990, the victims have been made to look like the criminals.
This criminal cabal has utilized tactics common to typical compulsive liars. The former UN Secretary General, Butros Butros Ghali, has often lamented over the fact that on many occasion he wanted to convene the Security Council to look into the Rwanda Crisis as it was unfolding in order to protect the lives of innocent civilians. Each time his efforts were thwarted by the USA and UK for reasons only known to their leaders. The USA went as far as training, arming, financing, and manipulating the international media in order to make the cabal’s criminal agenda prevail and succeed.One does not have to graduate from a Military Academy to know that in war, the victor wins if it kills more of the enemy.
If RPF and NRA defeated the Rwandese army, it goes without saying who killed more of whom. Regarding the theory of winning a war, General Patton said that, “Let the other son of a bitch die for his country”? How can then any person be fooled to believe that the defeated Hutus killed that many Tutsis and stilllost the war? The campaign to demonize all Hutus as “genociders” – an accusation which was never applied to Germans after WW II –has been effectively applied to Hutus and has demonized the entire ethnic group, including those who lived abroad during those years.
This kind of blanket accusation which is intended to protect the true criminals in this horrendous crime of invasion and mass murders and ethnic cleansing, which Tutsis are committing in Rwanda up to now, paints a an unbelievable picture of Hutus as being sophisticated in the art of war and so highly organized that they had the capability of amassing their enemies and slaughtering them in a matter of days. Not even a fool could believe that. It is sad to admit that that Hitler and Goebbels ingenuity in twisting facts and truth have made believers among today’s world’s greatest democracies. Secondly, we look at the population of Rwanda which was about 7 million people at that time. Tutsis were about 10% about 700,000 people. Is the cabal’s propaganda machine trying to convince us that all Tutsis in Rwanda were mobilized to be in accessible locations so that murderous thugs could butcher them in a matter of days?
Depicting Hutus as a collection of murderous thugs, when in fact they are the victims, and yet the German population was not so depicted after WWII is not only a skillful cover up of the truth but also an abomination of human reasoning. The Tutsis were always a minority in Rwanda. During the Hutu rule of Kayibanda and Habyarimana, there were many Tutsi attempts to invade and take power by force. There was no single time when Hutus ordered their army of civilians to butcher Tutsis. Yet in neighboring Burundi where Tutsi minority control the country, since 1960, there have been numerous pogroms of Hutus by ruling Tutsis which have claimed thousands of innocent Hutus. The UN has done nothing to bring the killers in Burundi to justice. Why? Now that we know what NRA did in Uganda during the war that ousted Obote’s regime and brought Museveni to power.
The same tricks were repeated in Rwanda when the same group NRA/RPF invaded Rwanda and overthrew Habyarimana’s government and established a Tutsi dominated junta. Former NRA intelligence officers reveal that in January of 1994, NRA deployed 950 soldiers from Uganda to Kigali in civilian clothes to take up positions in preparation for the planned mass killings that were to take place soon after the Rwandese President was killed by NRA/RPF in collaboration with Belgian troops, both of which had full control of the airport. They later sent another force of 5000 soldiers in other localities in the country to carry out the same job on a simultaneous basis. We have also learned that machetes, pangas, axes plus mobile radio transmitting units were brought in from Uganda to be used in the mass murders of civilians who happened to be Hutus, not Tutsis as the cabal wants us to believe.
Those tools were returned to Uganda as soon as the job was finished. Could this have been a nasty way of paying back the Hutus for their 1959/60 overthrow of the Tutsi monarchy when no guns were used?The same tactic has been effectively applied in northern Uganda where for nearly 20 years, NRA original goal of wiping out the Nilotic tribes are conducted with impunity. It is inconceivable that the Lords Resistance Army or Lakwena, who do not exceed two thousands, can prevail over NRA for all these years when operating inside Uganda which is under Museveni’s full controls. NRA successfully invaded Rwanda and Zaire and also gave the Sudanese army a hard time but cannot clean up an area as narrow as Acholi? According to local people in northern Uganda s and also people inside NRA, there are reports which have been suppressed by the western media to the effect that the so called crimes of mutilating people in Acholi, abducting children etc.. are all the works of NRA in order to justify their ethnic cleansing in northern Uganda.
The Tutsi controlled radio MUHABURA was spreading ethnic hatred of Hutus and never received criticism from either the USA or the UK. The Voice of America also set up a special Kinyarwanda Broadcast reporting the Tutsi side of the Rwanda crisis. The game of demonizing Hutus as mass killers was orchestrated at maximum speed by the western media, utilizing reporters and human rights watchers who were censored by USA or UK and had to go through Uganda to reach Rwanda. Roger Winters of the U.S. Committee for Refugees, plus another hired gun, William Pike, played a key role that made those two white men look like twin sons of Joseph Goebbels. We learned later that RPF/NRA had portable radio transmitters which broadcast their messages over the same channels of Hutu radio and spread murderous messages as part of the wider scheme to demonize Hutus.
For outside listeners and readers, all that sounded as the work of a highly organized Hutu killing machine. Yet indeed, the Hutus as a people were in total disarray and confusion at that moment in time. This assertion does not deny a fact that Hutus killed Tutsis. However, the organized killing of thousands of innocent civilians was the work of Kagame and Museveni. The greatest majority of the victims were Hutus but not Tutsis as the cabal propagandists want us to believe. The USA had already supplied RPF with radio jamming technology to block Hutu broadcasts to the masses. This was confirmed by a State Department person at a meeting of The Rwanda Forum that I attended in Washington DC in 1993.
If in fact the death toll was anywhere between 500,000 and a 1,000,000 people, and most of that killing took place in and around the city of Kigali, it absolutely impossible to have had that many Tutsis in the area. I personally visited Kigali and Ruhengyeri twice in March and August of 1993. I drove thorough the markets, hospitals, public car parks and around town. I could hardly count ten (10) Tutsis among those crowds – much as Tutsis are very conspicuous when among Hutus. The Hutus who reacted and indeed did kill some Tutsis could have responded to the misleading radio massages given out by the RPF killing machine which I have outlined above. Others may have reacted in anger in a manner no different from that of Black Americans after the killing of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968 or the barbaric treatment of Mr. Rodney King on April 29, 1992 in Los Angeles.
We cannot blame the US government for both of those riots since they were natural reaction to a provocative tragedy. Besides, what would anyone expect people to react like when they are slaughtered by invaders and their government leaders have been killed by the enemy who is clearly known?As soon as RPF came into power, they exhumed the skeletons of their victims from where they had hidden them. They collected the skeletons and paraded them all over Kigali and on roadsides throughout Rwanda to impress outside investigators so as to justify their criminal invasion of a Free State and murdering her citizens.Foreign journalists, human rights investigators and foreign policy makers who went to Rwanda during the fighting and after RPF took over, had to go through Uganda from where they were escorted by NRA or RPF agents.
They were managed thoroughly as to which places they can visit, whom to interview etc. In some of those interviews that were broadcast abroad, the local people who were interviewed could speak English with a Ugandan accent while others could be overheard speaking broken Swahili. We already know that Tutsis from Uganda, Congo, USA, Tanzania, Belgium and elsewhere flocked back to Rwanda after RPF conquered the Hutu army. They took over homes, farms and other properties that belonged to Hutus who were either killed or fled into exile. There are cases where Hutu families who returned home to find their family home occupied by Tutsis were permitted to build grass shanty nearby instead of reclaiming their original nice houses which they had built with their own labor.
Their only role in life is to be slaves of the Tutsis.No one has ever questioned what could have motivated an entire population to run off from their land into exile, as was the case in Rwanda during those dark days. The cabal’s propaganda has blindfolded to believe what is unbelievable. Only fire at each one’s rare end can force a people to flee for their lives in such huge numbers. I find it very difficult to believe that all those skulls are what they claim to be. After all, no one can tell the difference between the skull of a Tutsi and that of a Hutu or a Chinese or German for that matter. This trick of fabricating facts to favor NRA in Uganda was done to the maximum and served Museveni very well to convince the world that the Luwero Triangle skeletons he paraded were victims of Obote’s soldiers while in actual fact it was NRA who killed the citizens of that area and put the blame on Obote’s government.
The same people who did that in Luwero repeated it in Rwanda and, unfortunately, it worked for them both times.The cabal fabricated and carried out a well managed media campaign to demonize Hutu people as murderers while covering up the crimes of the real murderers. The crimes of NRA and RPF, first of invading another country have been swept under the rug for all these years. Yet, when Iraq invaded Kuwait a few years ago, the USA and Britain mobilized other nations to drive the invaders out of Kuwait. RPF/NRA crimes of murdering thousands of innocent civilians and displacing nearly a million people from the day of invasion in 1990 to April of 1994 have been ignored tactfully.
Contrary to public lies which have been spread all over the world that Hutus massacred nearly a million Tutsis right after the RPF killed President Habyarimana we have information from people who were inside Museveni’s military/security system bringing new revelations that the so called genocide was planned by the Museveni/Kagame group to justify their attack on Kigali and win sympathy for their monolithic Tutsi regime, and also enable them to mobilize foreign aid without anyone questioning their barbaric brutality and gross human rights violations.Kagame and Museveni knew and planned the mass killings of innocent people who were to be predominantly Hutus, right after the President’s plane was shot down by RPF.
Kagame is quoted as saying that about 500,000 people will be slaughtered during that period of confusion. Hose people who did not know that Kagame was behind the planned genocide have accused him of being callous because he did not take steps to protect those many innocent lives, but rather was merely interested in taking power. We can now understand why he was not concerned about the loss of innocent lives if, in fact, he was responsible for their death. Second, the people who got killed were predominantly Hutu civilians as he had done in Northern Rwanda since October of 1990 and especially in Byumba and Ruhengeri in February of 1993. However, this time around Kagame had already set in motion media propaganda to claim that the people hacked to death were Tutsis and their killers were Hutu thugs.In March of 1994 a team of Tutsi/Hima soldiers from NRA were sent into Rwanda in civilian clothing.
They went into Kigali proper. Their mission was to carry out mass killings of civilians in Kigali and the surrounding areas. Another group of 5000 soldiers, all in civilian clothes, were subsequently sent into other populated areas of Rwanda to carry out the same mission of mass killings soon after President Habyarimana has been killed. Kagame armed all those men with machetes and pangas delivered to them directly from Uganda, their supply headquarters. In addition to those tools, they had portable radios and broadcasting units which transposed their messages onto the regular radio channels of Rwanda. The message was for Hutus to kill Tutsis who had killed the president.
To any outsider monitoring those radio broadcasts, the killers were obviously assumed to be Hutus while in actual fact it was Tutsis and Himas from Uganda who were carrying out the killings so as to tarnish the image of Hutus in the world community. Soon after the killings had been done, all the equipments (radios, pangas and machetes) were returned to Uganda, lest they be noticed by investigators for they were all brand new and had markings identifying them as coming from Uganda.
For any person to claim that between 800,000 and 1,000,000 Tutsis were slaughtered begs the question. Most of that killing was in the city of Kigali. What was the population of Kigali and how many of those were Tutsis. Interviews with refugees tell stories of many Hutus who lost their family members, and those were not necessarily opposition party members.Another area of concern for any person who wants to obtain the hidden truth would be to ask RPF leaders what may have caused a whole population of people to run away as the Rwandese did into exile. There must have been a thorough and well organized attack on the entire population to cause them gets into flight.
The only force which could possibly do that was RPF invaders. In September of 1992, I received information from sources in the Uganda military stating that Tutsis were planning to bulldoze Hututs off the land and replace them with Tutsis. I shared that information with some people, but they responded with laughter and scorn saying that it was impossible to bulldoze an entire population from their land, especially since the targeted population was the majority. The RPF crimes against the population have tactfully been swept under the rug for all these years.In January of 1990 a team of 150 mostly Tutsi men from the NRA and ISO were sent to Rwanda to survey (in military terms “WRECK” the situation prior to the proposed invasion which took place on October 1 of the same year.The RPF is committing atrocities of genocide in Rwanda from the day they invaded that country October 1, 1990 up to the present which have been ignored by the biased western media for reasons only known to themselves.
The U.S. government, Britain and Belgium are equally as guilty in the crimes of genocide in Rwanda. The participation of USA in the RPF crimes deserve its leaders to be tried before a Court of Justice if there is any in this world.SKULLS OF HUTUS KILLED BY RPF: The RPF massacre of innocent people in northern Rwanda in February of 1993 claimed over 25,000 civilian lives and displaced more than 100,000 people from their home area. At one location near Byumba, in a football stadium built by Mr. Kabuga, RPF massacred about 2000 people, cutting off their heads which they then buried in pits.
After the conquest of Rwanda, the RPF junta dug out all the sculls of their own victims and paraded them in Kigali and everywhere as skulls of Tutsis who were killed by Hutus. Such calculated and blatant lies horrified the local people who witnessed those crimes being committed and also witnessed the actual unearthing of the skulls and skeletons for display in Kigali and on roadsides for the world to further condemn the Hutus en masse.CORPSES IN THE RIVER KAGERA AND LAKE VICTORIA:RPF has become a master of deception and lies which have gone on unabated for years. One should look at the way RPF entered Rwanda in two columns. One column followed eastern route along the Rwanda Tanzania border. That area was already under RPF control. It is through that swampy area that River Kagera passes and has a bridge that crosses into Tanzania. During that time many Hutu civilians fled their homes and country as RPF invaders were on a wild rampage of killing any person in sight.
Those who attempted to enter Tanzania via the only crossing there is met RPF invaders waiting for them at the bridge. Thousands of Hutus were thrown into the raging river by RPF men. Others drowned in the attempt to cross the river away from the bridge where certain death awaited them. It is important to emphasize that all those corpses which floated into the river and eventually reached Lake Victoria were of Hutus and their killers were RPF. The Tutsi propaganda twisted the facts claiming those floating corpses as being of Tutsis killed by Hutu extremists. The world community and you here in this Tribunal have swallowed those fabrications up to this very day.
How could intelligent people in the UN and western governments be so myopic and not ask a simple question: if Hutu rioters in Kigali were killing any people – I am not denying the killings which took place mainly in Kigali – did they have any reason or means to transport their victims as far away as to dump those bodies in the river where there were columns of invading RPF on the move towards the capital?
Now we know who was killing and who were being killed. It is obvious that the people who were being killed were the ones on the run for their lives. That is why the world witnessed in horror a tremendous exodus of Hutus fleeing to Congo, Burundi and Tanzania but not to Uganda where the killers were coming from.
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
In an ethnic conflict such as is the case in Rwanda, truth is the first victim especially, regarding the accused. We do not have to wait hundreds of years like Oedipus Rex to be told the bitter truth.Thousands of innocent people were killed in Rwanda since October 1, 1990 when RPF invaded that country from Uganda. Between October 1, 1990 and April 1994, over 140,000 people were systematically killed by RPF/NRA in northern Rwanda, and over a million people were displaced rendering them to excruciating suffering without help from anywhere. That baleful killing of the innocent has continued up to today and also extended into Congo when RPF/NRA assisted by US Commandos, invaded Zaire slaughtering thousands of refugees in camps. The cabal went to great length to cover up their crimes as has been demonstrated over the years. Their lies have fooled the entire world community up to this very day, including the UNO. Nobles, intellectuals and commoners alike have come to believe the fabrications generated purposely to give legitimacy to a criminal gang dressed in the banality of evil so as to give them legitimacy, sympathy and acceptability, while covering up their heinous crimes against humanity which superseded those of Pol Pot of Cambodia and Salvadore Ayende of Chile.
The evidence, based on revelations from NRA military and intelligence officers plus interviews of peasant refugees which our organization has collected point to Tutsis. The RPF, together with NRA and the United State are implicated very clearly as the greatest criminals of the Rwanda genocide.Because of the lies and cover-ups which have been thoroughly concocted and orchestrated ever since the invasion started on October 1, 1990, the victims have been made to look like the criminals.
This criminal cabal has utilized tactics common to typical compulsive liars. The former UN Secretary General, Butros Butros Ghali, has often lamented over the fact that on many occasion he wanted to convene the Security Council to look into the Rwanda Crisis as it was unfolding in order to protect the lives of innocent civilians. Each time his efforts were thwarted by the USA and UK for reasons only known to their leaders. The USA went as far as training, arming, financing, and manipulating the international media in order to make the cabal’s criminal agenda prevail and succeed.One does not have to graduate from a Military Academy to know that in war, the victor wins if it kills more of the enemy.
If RPF and NRA defeated the Rwandese army, it goes without saying who killed more of whom. Regarding the theory of winning a war, General Patton said that, “Let the other son of a bitch die for his country”? How can then any person be fooled to believe that the defeated Hutus killed that many Tutsis and stilllost the war? The campaign to demonize all Hutus as “genociders” – an accusation which was never applied to Germans after WW II –has been effectively applied to Hutus and has demonized the entire ethnic group, including those who lived abroad during those years.
This kind of blanket accusation which is intended to protect the true criminals in this horrendous crime of invasion and mass murders and ethnic cleansing, which Tutsis are committing in Rwanda up to now, paints a an unbelievable picture of Hutus as being sophisticated in the art of war and so highly organized that they had the capability of amassing their enemies and slaughtering them in a matter of days. Not even a fool could believe that. It is sad to admit that that Hitler and Goebbels ingenuity in twisting facts and truth have made believers among today’s world’s greatest democracies. Secondly, we look at the population of Rwanda which was about 7 million people at that time. Tutsis were about 10% about 700,000 people. Is the cabal’s propaganda machine trying to convince us that all Tutsis in Rwanda were mobilized to be in accessible locations so that murderous thugs could butcher them in a matter of days?
Depicting Hutus as a collection of murderous thugs, when in fact they are the victims, and yet the German population was not so depicted after WWII is not only a skillful cover up of the truth but also an abomination of human reasoning. The Tutsis were always a minority in Rwanda. During the Hutu rule of Kayibanda and Habyarimana, there were many Tutsi attempts to invade and take power by force. There was no single time when Hutus ordered their army of civilians to butcher Tutsis. Yet in neighboring Burundi where Tutsi minority control the country, since 1960, there have been numerous pogroms of Hutus by ruling Tutsis which have claimed thousands of innocent Hutus. The UN has done nothing to bring the killers in Burundi to justice. Why? Now that we know what NRA did in Uganda during the war that ousted Obote’s regime and brought Museveni to power.
The same tricks were repeated in Rwanda when the same group NRA/RPF invaded Rwanda and overthrew Habyarimana’s government and established a Tutsi dominated junta. Former NRA intelligence officers reveal that in January of 1994, NRA deployed 950 soldiers from Uganda to Kigali in civilian clothes to take up positions in preparation for the planned mass killings that were to take place soon after the Rwandese President was killed by NRA/RPF in collaboration with Belgian troops, both of which had full control of the airport. They later sent another force of 5000 soldiers in other localities in the country to carry out the same job on a simultaneous basis. We have also learned that machetes, pangas, axes plus mobile radio transmitting units were brought in from Uganda to be used in the mass murders of civilians who happened to be Hutus, not Tutsis as the cabal wants us to believe.
Those tools were returned to Uganda as soon as the job was finished. Could this have been a nasty way of paying back the Hutus for their 1959/60 overthrow of the Tutsi monarchy when no guns were used?The same tactic has been effectively applied in northern Uganda where for nearly 20 years, NRA original goal of wiping out the Nilotic tribes are conducted with impunity. It is inconceivable that the Lords Resistance Army or Lakwena, who do not exceed two thousands, can prevail over NRA for all these years when operating inside Uganda which is under Museveni’s full controls. NRA successfully invaded Rwanda and Zaire and also gave the Sudanese army a hard time but cannot clean up an area as narrow as Acholi? According to local people in northern Uganda s and also people inside NRA, there are reports which have been suppressed by the western media to the effect that the so called crimes of mutilating people in Acholi, abducting children etc.. are all the works of NRA in order to justify their ethnic cleansing in northern Uganda.
The Tutsi controlled radio MUHABURA was spreading ethnic hatred of Hutus and never received criticism from either the USA or the UK. The Voice of America also set up a special Kinyarwanda Broadcast reporting the Tutsi side of the Rwanda crisis. The game of demonizing Hutus as mass killers was orchestrated at maximum speed by the western media, utilizing reporters and human rights watchers who were censored by USA or UK and had to go through Uganda to reach Rwanda. Roger Winters of the U.S. Committee for Refugees, plus another hired gun, William Pike, played a key role that made those two white men look like twin sons of Joseph Goebbels. We learned later that RPF/NRA had portable radio transmitters which broadcast their messages over the same channels of Hutu radio and spread murderous messages as part of the wider scheme to demonize Hutus.
For outside listeners and readers, all that sounded as the work of a highly organized Hutu killing machine. Yet indeed, the Hutus as a people were in total disarray and confusion at that moment in time. This assertion does not deny a fact that Hutus killed Tutsis. However, the organized killing of thousands of innocent civilians was the work of Kagame and Museveni. The greatest majority of the victims were Hutus but not Tutsis as the cabal propagandists want us to believe. The USA had already supplied RPF with radio jamming technology to block Hutu broadcasts to the masses. This was confirmed by a State Department person at a meeting of The Rwanda Forum that I attended in Washington DC in 1993.
If in fact the death toll was anywhere between 500,000 and a 1,000,000 people, and most of that killing took place in and around the city of Kigali, it absolutely impossible to have had that many Tutsis in the area. I personally visited Kigali and Ruhengyeri twice in March and August of 1993. I drove thorough the markets, hospitals, public car parks and around town. I could hardly count ten (10) Tutsis among those crowds – much as Tutsis are very conspicuous when among Hutus. The Hutus who reacted and indeed did kill some Tutsis could have responded to the misleading radio massages given out by the RPF killing machine which I have outlined above. Others may have reacted in anger in a manner no different from that of Black Americans after the killing of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968 or the barbaric treatment of Mr. Rodney King on April 29, 1992 in Los Angeles.
We cannot blame the US government for both of those riots since they were natural reaction to a provocative tragedy. Besides, what would anyone expect people to react like when they are slaughtered by invaders and their government leaders have been killed by the enemy who is clearly known?As soon as RPF came into power, they exhumed the skeletons of their victims from where they had hidden them. They collected the skeletons and paraded them all over Kigali and on roadsides throughout Rwanda to impress outside investigators so as to justify their criminal invasion of a Free State and murdering her citizens.Foreign journalists, human rights investigators and foreign policy makers who went to Rwanda during the fighting and after RPF took over, had to go through Uganda from where they were escorted by NRA or RPF agents.
They were managed thoroughly as to which places they can visit, whom to interview etc. In some of those interviews that were broadcast abroad, the local people who were interviewed could speak English with a Ugandan accent while others could be overheard speaking broken Swahili. We already know that Tutsis from Uganda, Congo, USA, Tanzania, Belgium and elsewhere flocked back to Rwanda after RPF conquered the Hutu army. They took over homes, farms and other properties that belonged to Hutus who were either killed or fled into exile. There are cases where Hutu families who returned home to find their family home occupied by Tutsis were permitted to build grass shanty nearby instead of reclaiming their original nice houses which they had built with their own labor.
Their only role in life is to be slaves of the Tutsis.No one has ever questioned what could have motivated an entire population to run off from their land into exile, as was the case in Rwanda during those dark days. The cabal’s propaganda has blindfolded to believe what is unbelievable. Only fire at each one’s rare end can force a people to flee for their lives in such huge numbers. I find it very difficult to believe that all those skulls are what they claim to be. After all, no one can tell the difference between the skull of a Tutsi and that of a Hutu or a Chinese or German for that matter. This trick of fabricating facts to favor NRA in Uganda was done to the maximum and served Museveni very well to convince the world that the Luwero Triangle skeletons he paraded were victims of Obote’s soldiers while in actual fact it was NRA who killed the citizens of that area and put the blame on Obote’s government.
The same people who did that in Luwero repeated it in Rwanda and, unfortunately, it worked for them both times.The cabal fabricated and carried out a well managed media campaign to demonize Hutu people as murderers while covering up the crimes of the real murderers. The crimes of NRA and RPF, first of invading another country have been swept under the rug for all these years. Yet, when Iraq invaded Kuwait a few years ago, the USA and Britain mobilized other nations to drive the invaders out of Kuwait. RPF/NRA crimes of murdering thousands of innocent civilians and displacing nearly a million people from the day of invasion in 1990 to April of 1994 have been ignored tactfully.
Contrary to public lies which have been spread all over the world that Hutus massacred nearly a million Tutsis right after the RPF killed President Habyarimana we have information from people who were inside Museveni’s military/security system bringing new revelations that the so called genocide was planned by the Museveni/Kagame group to justify their attack on Kigali and win sympathy for their monolithic Tutsi regime, and also enable them to mobilize foreign aid without anyone questioning their barbaric brutality and gross human rights violations.Kagame and Museveni knew and planned the mass killings of innocent people who were to be predominantly Hutus, right after the President’s plane was shot down by RPF.
Kagame is quoted as saying that about 500,000 people will be slaughtered during that period of confusion. Hose people who did not know that Kagame was behind the planned genocide have accused him of being callous because he did not take steps to protect those many innocent lives, but rather was merely interested in taking power. We can now understand why he was not concerned about the loss of innocent lives if, in fact, he was responsible for their death. Second, the people who got killed were predominantly Hutu civilians as he had done in Northern Rwanda since October of 1990 and especially in Byumba and Ruhengeri in February of 1993. However, this time around Kagame had already set in motion media propaganda to claim that the people hacked to death were Tutsis and their killers were Hutu thugs.In March of 1994 a team of Tutsi/Hima soldiers from NRA were sent into Rwanda in civilian clothing.
They went into Kigali proper. Their mission was to carry out mass killings of civilians in Kigali and the surrounding areas. Another group of 5000 soldiers, all in civilian clothes, were subsequently sent into other populated areas of Rwanda to carry out the same mission of mass killings soon after President Habyarimana has been killed. Kagame armed all those men with machetes and pangas delivered to them directly from Uganda, their supply headquarters. In addition to those tools, they had portable radios and broadcasting units which transposed their messages onto the regular radio channels of Rwanda. The message was for Hutus to kill Tutsis who had killed the president.
To any outsider monitoring those radio broadcasts, the killers were obviously assumed to be Hutus while in actual fact it was Tutsis and Himas from Uganda who were carrying out the killings so as to tarnish the image of Hutus in the world community. Soon after the killings had been done, all the equipments (radios, pangas and machetes) were returned to Uganda, lest they be noticed by investigators for they were all brand new and had markings identifying them as coming from Uganda.
For any person to claim that between 800,000 and 1,000,000 Tutsis were slaughtered begs the question. Most of that killing was in the city of Kigali. What was the population of Kigali and how many of those were Tutsis. Interviews with refugees tell stories of many Hutus who lost their family members, and those were not necessarily opposition party members.Another area of concern for any person who wants to obtain the hidden truth would be to ask RPF leaders what may have caused a whole population of people to run away as the Rwandese did into exile. There must have been a thorough and well organized attack on the entire population to cause them gets into flight.
The only force which could possibly do that was RPF invaders. In September of 1992, I received information from sources in the Uganda military stating that Tutsis were planning to bulldoze Hututs off the land and replace them with Tutsis. I shared that information with some people, but they responded with laughter and scorn saying that it was impossible to bulldoze an entire population from their land, especially since the targeted population was the majority. The RPF crimes against the population have tactfully been swept under the rug for all these years.In January of 1990 a team of 150 mostly Tutsi men from the NRA and ISO were sent to Rwanda to survey (in military terms “WRECK” the situation prior to the proposed invasion which took place on October 1 of the same year.The RPF is committing atrocities of genocide in Rwanda from the day they invaded that country October 1, 1990 up to the present which have been ignored by the biased western media for reasons only known to themselves.
The U.S. government, Britain and Belgium are equally as guilty in the crimes of genocide in Rwanda. The participation of USA in the RPF crimes deserve its leaders to be tried before a Court of Justice if there is any in this world.SKULLS OF HUTUS KILLED BY RPF: The RPF massacre of innocent people in northern Rwanda in February of 1993 claimed over 25,000 civilian lives and displaced more than 100,000 people from their home area. At one location near Byumba, in a football stadium built by Mr. Kabuga, RPF massacred about 2000 people, cutting off their heads which they then buried in pits.
After the conquest of Rwanda, the RPF junta dug out all the sculls of their own victims and paraded them in Kigali and everywhere as skulls of Tutsis who were killed by Hutus. Such calculated and blatant lies horrified the local people who witnessed those crimes being committed and also witnessed the actual unearthing of the skulls and skeletons for display in Kigali and on roadsides for the world to further condemn the Hutus en masse.CORPSES IN THE RIVER KAGERA AND LAKE VICTORIA:RPF has become a master of deception and lies which have gone on unabated for years. One should look at the way RPF entered Rwanda in two columns. One column followed eastern route along the Rwanda Tanzania border. That area was already under RPF control. It is through that swampy area that River Kagera passes and has a bridge that crosses into Tanzania. During that time many Hutu civilians fled their homes and country as RPF invaders were on a wild rampage of killing any person in sight.
Those who attempted to enter Tanzania via the only crossing there is met RPF invaders waiting for them at the bridge. Thousands of Hutus were thrown into the raging river by RPF men. Others drowned in the attempt to cross the river away from the bridge where certain death awaited them. It is important to emphasize that all those corpses which floated into the river and eventually reached Lake Victoria were of Hutus and their killers were RPF. The Tutsi propaganda twisted the facts claiming those floating corpses as being of Tutsis killed by Hutu extremists. The world community and you here in this Tribunal have swallowed those fabrications up to this very day.
How could intelligent people in the UN and western governments be so myopic and not ask a simple question: if Hutu rioters in Kigali were killing any people – I am not denying the killings which took place mainly in Kigali – did they have any reason or means to transport their victims as far away as to dump those bodies in the river where there were columns of invading RPF on the move towards the capital?
Now we know who was killing and who were being killed. It is obvious that the people who were being killed were the ones on the run for their lives. That is why the world witnessed in horror a tremendous exodus of Hutus fleeing to Congo, Burundi and Tanzania but not to Uganda where the killers were coming from.
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
It is time to stop the spread of Lies, Misinformation and Propaganda published by BBC on Rwanda.
British administrations have used their proxy army to invade, kill, assassinate and massacre innocent Rwandan and later Congolese people. To reach this bloody goal, British Conservatives and later Tony Blair used both British media to cover all crimes committed by Museveni and Paul Kagame under the RPF umbrella.
Rwandans started by being typed by British media at the front line remains BBC to spread up lies, to misinform and spread up RPF propaganda telling Rwandans and the world they want to liberate the country. Since 1990, we are witnessing 18 years of lies, misinformation and RPF propaganda.
Tony blair has been advocating RPF criminals before international institutions including UN. As a British Prime minister, the hidden agenda of occupying Rwanda by using the minority Tutsis led by the heavyweight criminal Paul Kagame has been reached. Actually Tony Blair announced to be Paul Kagame's advisor, for those who could understand the meaning understood Tony Blair decides, and Paul Kagame implements. For Both Criminals, ruling Rwanda became an outstanding opportunity for manipulating both propaganda and disinformation about Rwanda Nazism and of course changing the role-played by Paul Kagame into a disciplined chief rebel and not the very mastermind of the Rwanda Genocide. Actually Rwanda is misnforming EU and the rest of the world.
To understand the trick read Raymond Frenken article here below:
Rwanda is 'misinforming' EU, leading dissident says
By Raymond Frenken
BRUSSELS (EUX.TV) -- The government of Rwanda has embarked on an intensive smear-campaign that includes misinformation and propaganda targeted at the European Union and the international community, according to a leading Rwanda dissident living here.
The campaign ultimately seeks to save the country's president, Paul Kagame, and some of his sympathizers from having to face international justice for their roles in the 1994 genocide.
The latest move in the smear campaign is a book published by the Rwanda government in February, said Paul Rusesabagina, who was manager of the Milles Collines Hotel in Kigali during the 1994 genocide. Read his commentary.
Rusesabagina is credited with saving 1268 people from the genocide by offering them sanctuary in his hotel. He currently lives in exile in Belgium and is a leading dissident whose views clash with the 'official' government views presented in Rwanda and the country's media.
Rusesabagina's story has been turned into the blockbuster film "Hotel Rwanda" that stars Nick Nolte. He said the government's new book specifically targets him and his attempts to create complete clarity on 1994 genocide, in which approximately 800,000 people were killed during a period of 100 days. Rusesabagina currently is seeking support for a South-African style truth and reconciliation committee on the Rwanda genocide.
The government's book is called "A Response to Hotel Rwanda or the Tutsi Genocide as Seen by Hollywood" and is written by propaganda experts working for Paul Kagame, Rusesabagina said. It was presented as an independent publication in Brussels in February during an event at Brussels Free University.
"The book is nothing but a compilation of egregious lies cooked up by two Rwandan academics, Alfred Ndahiro - an advisor to President Kagame in communication and international relations, a man who never lived in Rwanda until Kagame brought him to the president’s office - and Privat Rutazibwa, a defrocked priest who once headed the Rwandan Information Agency, and is a journalist, writer, and ideologue for President Kagame’s political party, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF)," Rusesabagina writes in a comment on the book.
Watch an earlier interview with Paul Rusesabagina:
Rusesabagina says Rwandan President Paul Kagame, who claims to have ended the genocide by taking over the country as a rebel in 1994, has been waging "a fierce smear campaign" against him for five years.
Earlier this month, President Kagame told a Spanish judge, Fernando Andreu, to "go to hell" for issuing an arrest warrant for 40 Rwandese army officers. The officers, according to Andreu, took part in the killings in the 1994 genocide. Spanish law allows the prosecution of human rights crimes even if they took place in another country.
In 2006, similar indictments against nine aides of Kagame in France sparked a diplomatic row.
Rusesabagina also says that the Kagame government currently is releasing people convicted of having participated in the 1994 genocide in return for falsely testifying against him.
-- From the EUX.TV newsroom news@eux.tv
»Program on air: Hotel Rwanda - the Sequel: Interview with Paul Rusesabagina
RSS Feed print article
MORE
15/08
EU Parliament Ceiling 'Secured' After Collapse
14/08
EU Ministers Plan Georgia Mission (Video)
14/08
Video Playlist: EU Ministers on Georgia War
14/08
Russia Accuses EUX.TV of 'Dirty Propaganda'
13/08
Kouchner wants EU peacekeepers in Georgia
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
British administrations have used their proxy army to invade, kill, assassinate and massacre innocent Rwandan and later Congolese people. To reach this bloody goal, British Conservatives and later Tony Blair used both British media to cover all crimes committed by Museveni and Paul Kagame under the RPF umbrella.
Rwandans started by being typed by British media at the front line remains BBC to spread up lies, to misinform and spread up RPF propaganda telling Rwandans and the world they want to liberate the country. Since 1990, we are witnessing 18 years of lies, misinformation and RPF propaganda.
Tony blair has been advocating RPF criminals before international institutions including UN. As a British Prime minister, the hidden agenda of occupying Rwanda by using the minority Tutsis led by the heavyweight criminal Paul Kagame has been reached. Actually Tony Blair announced to be Paul Kagame's advisor, for those who could understand the meaning understood Tony Blair decides, and Paul Kagame implements. For Both Criminals, ruling Rwanda became an outstanding opportunity for manipulating both propaganda and disinformation about Rwanda Nazism and of course changing the role-played by Paul Kagame into a disciplined chief rebel and not the very mastermind of the Rwanda Genocide. Actually Rwanda is misnforming EU and the rest of the world.
To understand the trick read Raymond Frenken article here below:
Rwanda is 'misinforming' EU, leading dissident says
By Raymond Frenken
BRUSSELS (EUX.TV) -- The government of Rwanda has embarked on an intensive smear-campaign that includes misinformation and propaganda targeted at the European Union and the international community, according to a leading Rwanda dissident living here.
The campaign ultimately seeks to save the country's president, Paul Kagame, and some of his sympathizers from having to face international justice for their roles in the 1994 genocide.
The latest move in the smear campaign is a book published by the Rwanda government in February, said Paul Rusesabagina, who was manager of the Milles Collines Hotel in Kigali during the 1994 genocide. Read his commentary.
Rusesabagina is credited with saving 1268 people from the genocide by offering them sanctuary in his hotel. He currently lives in exile in Belgium and is a leading dissident whose views clash with the 'official' government views presented in Rwanda and the country's media.
Rusesabagina's story has been turned into the blockbuster film "Hotel Rwanda" that stars Nick Nolte. He said the government's new book specifically targets him and his attempts to create complete clarity on 1994 genocide, in which approximately 800,000 people were killed during a period of 100 days. Rusesabagina currently is seeking support for a South-African style truth and reconciliation committee on the Rwanda genocide.
The government's book is called "A Response to Hotel Rwanda or the Tutsi Genocide as Seen by Hollywood" and is written by propaganda experts working for Paul Kagame, Rusesabagina said. It was presented as an independent publication in Brussels in February during an event at Brussels Free University.
"The book is nothing but a compilation of egregious lies cooked up by two Rwandan academics, Alfred Ndahiro - an advisor to President Kagame in communication and international relations, a man who never lived in Rwanda until Kagame brought him to the president’s office - and Privat Rutazibwa, a defrocked priest who once headed the Rwandan Information Agency, and is a journalist, writer, and ideologue for President Kagame’s political party, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF)," Rusesabagina writes in a comment on the book.
Watch an earlier interview with Paul Rusesabagina:
Rusesabagina says Rwandan President Paul Kagame, who claims to have ended the genocide by taking over the country as a rebel in 1994, has been waging "a fierce smear campaign" against him for five years.
Earlier this month, President Kagame told a Spanish judge, Fernando Andreu, to "go to hell" for issuing an arrest warrant for 40 Rwandese army officers. The officers, according to Andreu, took part in the killings in the 1994 genocide. Spanish law allows the prosecution of human rights crimes even if they took place in another country.
In 2006, similar indictments against nine aides of Kagame in France sparked a diplomatic row.
Rusesabagina also says that the Kagame government currently is releasing people convicted of having participated in the 1994 genocide in return for falsely testifying against him.
-- From the EUX.TV newsroom news@eux.tv
»Program on air: Hotel Rwanda - the Sequel: Interview with Paul Rusesabagina
RSS Feed print article
MORE
15/08
EU Parliament Ceiling 'Secured' After Collapse
14/08
EU Ministers Plan Georgia Mission (Video)
14/08
Video Playlist: EU Ministers on Georgia War
14/08
Russia Accuses EUX.TV of 'Dirty Propaganda'
13/08
Kouchner wants EU peacekeepers in Georgia
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Opinion: Suspicion surrounds British designs on Great Lakes Region
Last updated : 12 Aug 2008, Kampala
-->
Dear RK,
Allow me a space in your reputable website to make a personal observation regarding events in our region, which at first sight may seem totally inconsequential to us Ugandans.
The reported swoop on Rwanda by British parliamentarians, headed by Henry Mitchell supposedly to teach a class of Rwandan teachers English language, (Times of London, Wed 06/08/08), captioned "Rwanda given two weeks of Tory Administration" seems strange to me, to say the least. Last year the Conservative Party Leader, David Cameron, a probable successor to Mr Gordon Brown, joined a smaller set of Tory volunteers in Rwanda to highlight project Umubano (Times of London pg 9-06/08/08). How come British MPs have become teachers over night? Equally surprising was the recent report that Mr. Tony Blair, former British Prime Minister, accepted appointment as Advisor to the Rwanda government. Since when has a former British Prime Minister stooped so low as to accept an obscure appointment as "Advisor" to what they love to call a "tin pot little African country"?. Why has Rwanda, a region smaller than our Karamoja region, suddenly become so important to the British? Since when have vultures swarmed in one spot where there is no carcass?
It may seem as impertinent a question as when Sir Isaac Newton asked himself "why does an apple fall" from its' tree. This apparently impertinent question led to a very pertinent answer that we know today as the theory of gravitation, etc.
I recall that soon after the fall of Field Marshall Amin in 1979, a French charity went about distributing food in Karamoja, when the area was ravaged by famine. The British media were quick to cry "foul" ..."what are the French doing in a former British colony?" they cried. As if Uganda was their property for life! But if we are to allow that former colonists still have exclusive rights to African countries, who do we see now in broad daylight encroaching on a former Belgian (French speaking) colony, contrary to the Munroe agreement/doctrine? It is now an open secret that the Anglo-Saxons, in their everlasting greed for other countries' resources are re-colonising by stealth, former French, Portuguese, even Spanish Colonies in Africa, eg, Equatorial Guinea. I mean the foiled "dogs of war" style of coup d'état, planned by the son of X-British Prime Minister, Mark Thatcher and his cabal. Don't be fooled that the British establishment knew nothing about it. The testimonies of Mr. Mann and others were reported in most international news media. For a sample of what is available, see for example, Our friend, the African dictator and Hedge funds lift the lid on African deception
Equally, certain events in our Great Lake Region, such as the incessant war in Somalia may seem like it has nothing to do with us in Uganda. This view is wrong and naive indeed. Remember that President Bush came to power with the sponsorship of American oil corporations. Four American oil companies, Chevron, Conoco, Phillips Petroleum and Amoco (now British Petroleum) had been granted petroleum concession in 1989 by the deposed Somali President Siad Barre. Even though this grant is now time barred/superseded by supervening events, the oil men still want us to believe that it is valid until Jesus comes back! The Somali war therefore has nothing to do with Islamic fundamentalism or "the war on terrorism" as American government propaganda wants us to believe. It is about resources. (see Oil in Darfur? Special Ops in Somalia?). Just as the war in North/North-Eastern Uganda is being waged by M7 and his partners in crime, Tullow/Harman Resources/Heritage oil & Gas concessions, because of the oil and gold, possibly uranium that covers Easter Congo/ Bunyoro /Northern Uganda; see Northern Uganda: Hidden War and Massive Suffering. Another White People's War for Oil. and DARFURISM, UGANDA & U.S. WAR IN AFRICA
I fear that because of the vast untapped resources of Uganda , oil included, as long as we remain in the hands of the present ruling cabal, Uganda could be heading in the direction of Somalia , or even worse. Those White Buccaneers thrive best when there is confusion.
It seems that Ugandan born and former Director of Military Intelligence of M7, President Kagame is taking advantage of the presence of a large number of British parliamentarians to shout aloud for the whole world to hear that the genocide in Rwanda was the work of Senior French officials (The Telegraph-06/08/08, pg 14), including the then incumbent French President Francois Miterrand. Could it be that he was tacitly encouraged to do so by Whitehall as to distract world attention from their surreptitious missions to Rwanda, a former Belgian (French speaking) country?
We Ugandans know very well that even before the public outrage in Rwanda which broke out on 6th April 1994, following the death of Presidents Juvenile Habyarimana of Rwanda and Cyprian Ntaryamira of Burundi respectively, the genocide of Hutus by RPF/NRA from Uganda side was already in full swing, but was still concealed to the whole world, except to the organizers, M7 & co and their Americans/British backers. Unfortunately, this fact was buried in the avalanche of events that followed the post 6th of April, 1994 uprising and genocide. There are books and articles, websites, etc, already available on the untold truth of the Rwanda genocide, ie, the cover-up, the reasons behind the invasion of Rwanda by Uganda and the people involved in the planning and execution of the genocide of Hutus. See Remigius Kintu, "The truth behind the Rwanda Tragedy" presented to ICRT at Arusha, 20/03/2005. Also see "US sponsored Rwanda genocide" and its aftermath by Keith Harmon Snow.
Details of the invasion plan was also faxed to Kenya Times and reported under the heading "New plan to invade Rwanda" dated 15/12/1990, by Philip Ochieng. If anything it is Kagame's hosts (the British) and the Americans who should answer for the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. Could it also be that Mr. Kagame is trying to blackmail French leaders to drop the case of his indictment by a French judge? Instead of accusing French leaders, would Kagame please care to tell us who shot the plane that killed the two presidents? There is no way the case can be tried without answering this crucial question, because of the inescapable legal requirement to establish "causation"; both factual, and legal causation. Be that as it may, the future of the minority Tutsis in Rwanda (or any where else) is better guaranteed by acceptance of democracy and reconciliation with the majority Hutus and not by changing colonial masters, just because they promise them continuance of their minority rule and concealment of human rights abuse.
During the same time I noticed that there is a Sudanese military delegation in Rwanda supposedly there to learn from Rwanda how the regime succeeded in converting their RPF into a regular national army. The Sudanese would do well to talk to victims of the regime, the Hutus, of Rwanda. They would discover a very ugly side of that army, ie the covert and continuous extermination of the Hutu people, a policy they would not like to import into their new Southern Sudan, if ever it will gain its sovereignty, after their expected referendum. It seems to me that GOSS leaders have not bothered to try and understand the geopolitical events of the Great Lake Region. They are apparently still unaware of the ethnic thread which runs through the Kigali , Bujumbura and Kampala regimes. This is even more so when more Sudanese have come to believe that the Kampala regime had a hand in the death of their late leader Dr. John Garang.
Is it any wonder why M7 is rushing to bring about the East African federation, without setting any criteria whatsoever? In Europe conditions were set for admission into the EU, such as economic performance, harmonization of laws and most of all, the existence of democracy. It was naive of Kenya and Tanzanian not to insist on definite convergence criteria such as a common working language(s) English/French and most important of all, democracy as preconditions for membership. We all know that all the three Tutsi controlled member states are hanging on to power by keeping their armies "tribal", hence they are able to rig elections with impunity. This means that major decisions affecting our resources, land and liberty are/will be decided by unelected dictators (I mean rigged elections). If Ugandans are not vigilant, we could find ourselves under Tutsi/Hima minority rule for a very long while indeed! We know now that all the four Tutsi controlled regimes (including Eastern D R C under Nkunda) survive by maintaining genocide as the cornerstone of their rule, if only because they would become instant victims of democracy!
All genuine Ugandans and our legislators alike please take note of what is happening in the G L R and unite to save our country from re-colonisation.
Katwe Reader
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Last updated : 12 Aug 2008, Kampala
-->
Dear RK,
Allow me a space in your reputable website to make a personal observation regarding events in our region, which at first sight may seem totally inconsequential to us Ugandans.
The reported swoop on Rwanda by British parliamentarians, headed by Henry Mitchell supposedly to teach a class of Rwandan teachers English language, (Times of London, Wed 06/08/08), captioned "Rwanda given two weeks of Tory Administration" seems strange to me, to say the least. Last year the Conservative Party Leader, David Cameron, a probable successor to Mr Gordon Brown, joined a smaller set of Tory volunteers in Rwanda to highlight project Umubano (Times of London pg 9-06/08/08). How come British MPs have become teachers over night? Equally surprising was the recent report that Mr. Tony Blair, former British Prime Minister, accepted appointment as Advisor to the Rwanda government. Since when has a former British Prime Minister stooped so low as to accept an obscure appointment as "Advisor" to what they love to call a "tin pot little African country"?. Why has Rwanda, a region smaller than our Karamoja region, suddenly become so important to the British? Since when have vultures swarmed in one spot where there is no carcass?
It may seem as impertinent a question as when Sir Isaac Newton asked himself "why does an apple fall" from its' tree. This apparently impertinent question led to a very pertinent answer that we know today as the theory of gravitation, etc.
I recall that soon after the fall of Field Marshall Amin in 1979, a French charity went about distributing food in Karamoja, when the area was ravaged by famine. The British media were quick to cry "foul" ..."what are the French doing in a former British colony?" they cried. As if Uganda was their property for life! But if we are to allow that former colonists still have exclusive rights to African countries, who do we see now in broad daylight encroaching on a former Belgian (French speaking) colony, contrary to the Munroe agreement/doctrine? It is now an open secret that the Anglo-Saxons, in their everlasting greed for other countries' resources are re-colonising by stealth, former French, Portuguese, even Spanish Colonies in Africa, eg, Equatorial Guinea. I mean the foiled "dogs of war" style of coup d'état, planned by the son of X-British Prime Minister, Mark Thatcher and his cabal. Don't be fooled that the British establishment knew nothing about it. The testimonies of Mr. Mann and others were reported in most international news media. For a sample of what is available, see for example, Our friend, the African dictator and Hedge funds lift the lid on African deception
Equally, certain events in our Great Lake Region, such as the incessant war in Somalia may seem like it has nothing to do with us in Uganda. This view is wrong and naive indeed. Remember that President Bush came to power with the sponsorship of American oil corporations. Four American oil companies, Chevron, Conoco, Phillips Petroleum and Amoco (now British Petroleum) had been granted petroleum concession in 1989 by the deposed Somali President Siad Barre. Even though this grant is now time barred/superseded by supervening events, the oil men still want us to believe that it is valid until Jesus comes back! The Somali war therefore has nothing to do with Islamic fundamentalism or "the war on terrorism" as American government propaganda wants us to believe. It is about resources. (see Oil in Darfur? Special Ops in Somalia?). Just as the war in North/North-Eastern Uganda is being waged by M7 and his partners in crime, Tullow/Harman Resources/Heritage oil & Gas concessions, because of the oil and gold, possibly uranium that covers Easter Congo/ Bunyoro /Northern Uganda; see Northern Uganda: Hidden War and Massive Suffering. Another White People's War for Oil. and DARFURISM, UGANDA & U.S. WAR IN AFRICA
I fear that because of the vast untapped resources of Uganda , oil included, as long as we remain in the hands of the present ruling cabal, Uganda could be heading in the direction of Somalia , or even worse. Those White Buccaneers thrive best when there is confusion.
It seems that Ugandan born and former Director of Military Intelligence of M7, President Kagame is taking advantage of the presence of a large number of British parliamentarians to shout aloud for the whole world to hear that the genocide in Rwanda was the work of Senior French officials (The Telegraph-06/08/08, pg 14), including the then incumbent French President Francois Miterrand. Could it be that he was tacitly encouraged to do so by Whitehall as to distract world attention from their surreptitious missions to Rwanda, a former Belgian (French speaking) country?
We Ugandans know very well that even before the public outrage in Rwanda which broke out on 6th April 1994, following the death of Presidents Juvenile Habyarimana of Rwanda and Cyprian Ntaryamira of Burundi respectively, the genocide of Hutus by RPF/NRA from Uganda side was already in full swing, but was still concealed to the whole world, except to the organizers, M7 & co and their Americans/British backers. Unfortunately, this fact was buried in the avalanche of events that followed the post 6th of April, 1994 uprising and genocide. There are books and articles, websites, etc, already available on the untold truth of the Rwanda genocide, ie, the cover-up, the reasons behind the invasion of Rwanda by Uganda and the people involved in the planning and execution of the genocide of Hutus. See Remigius Kintu, "The truth behind the Rwanda Tragedy" presented to ICRT at Arusha, 20/03/2005. Also see "US sponsored Rwanda genocide" and its aftermath by Keith Harmon Snow.
Details of the invasion plan was also faxed to Kenya Times and reported under the heading "New plan to invade Rwanda" dated 15/12/1990, by Philip Ochieng. If anything it is Kagame's hosts (the British) and the Americans who should answer for the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. Could it also be that Mr. Kagame is trying to blackmail French leaders to drop the case of his indictment by a French judge? Instead of accusing French leaders, would Kagame please care to tell us who shot the plane that killed the two presidents? There is no way the case can be tried without answering this crucial question, because of the inescapable legal requirement to establish "causation"; both factual, and legal causation. Be that as it may, the future of the minority Tutsis in Rwanda (or any where else) is better guaranteed by acceptance of democracy and reconciliation with the majority Hutus and not by changing colonial masters, just because they promise them continuance of their minority rule and concealment of human rights abuse.
During the same time I noticed that there is a Sudanese military delegation in Rwanda supposedly there to learn from Rwanda how the regime succeeded in converting their RPF into a regular national army. The Sudanese would do well to talk to victims of the regime, the Hutus, of Rwanda. They would discover a very ugly side of that army, ie the covert and continuous extermination of the Hutu people, a policy they would not like to import into their new Southern Sudan, if ever it will gain its sovereignty, after their expected referendum. It seems to me that GOSS leaders have not bothered to try and understand the geopolitical events of the Great Lake Region. They are apparently still unaware of the ethnic thread which runs through the Kigali , Bujumbura and Kampala regimes. This is even more so when more Sudanese have come to believe that the Kampala regime had a hand in the death of their late leader Dr. John Garang.
Is it any wonder why M7 is rushing to bring about the East African federation, without setting any criteria whatsoever? In Europe conditions were set for admission into the EU, such as economic performance, harmonization of laws and most of all, the existence of democracy. It was naive of Kenya and Tanzanian not to insist on definite convergence criteria such as a common working language(s) English/French and most important of all, democracy as preconditions for membership. We all know that all the three Tutsi controlled member states are hanging on to power by keeping their armies "tribal", hence they are able to rig elections with impunity. This means that major decisions affecting our resources, land and liberty are/will be decided by unelected dictators (I mean rigged elections). If Ugandans are not vigilant, we could find ourselves under Tutsi/Hima minority rule for a very long while indeed! We know now that all the four Tutsi controlled regimes (including Eastern D R C under Nkunda) survive by maintaining genocide as the cornerstone of their rule, if only because they would become instant victims of democracy!
All genuine Ugandans and our legislators alike please take note of what is happening in the G L R and unite to save our country from re-colonisation.
Katwe Reader
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Thursday, August 14, 2008
Kagame’s “Big Lie”:
Rwanda Accuses French Leaders of Complicity in Genocide
Prof. Peter Erlinder[1]
ARUSHA, TZ – August 7 – On August 5 the Kagame Government of Rwanda issued a 500-page report accusing dozens of French officials with complicity in the 1994 massacres of civilians in Rwanda, including former Foreign Minister Villepin and President Mitterand. The “French Genocide Report” is a perfect example of Hitlerian “Big Lie” strategy.…designed to shift world attention away from the growing body of evidence that Rwandan President Kagame, himself, is a war criminal who is primarily responsible for the tragedy that has come to be commonly known as the “Rwanda genocide.” Most press coverage of the “French Report” failed to note that Kagame, and much of the Rwandan leadership, is already under indictment for War Crimes and Genocide in both France and Spain, and that the “French Report” is a response to existing indictments of Rwanda’s leaders.
Growing Evidence of Kagame’s Responsibility
for War Crimes and Genocide
Rwanda’s “French Report” admits that the investigation of French involvement only began in 2006, apparently only days after French Judge Bruguiere indicted members of Kagame’s Government for War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and Genocide. Bruguiere also requested through Kofi Annan that the UN Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) prosecute Kagame for the assassination of the previous President of Rwanda, and for initiating the violence that led to the massive civilian killings in 1994. But, it is not only France that is seeking the arrest and prosecution of Kagame and his followers.
In February 2008, Spanish Judge Andreu issued a second 180-page indictment that details War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and Genocide committed by Kagame and his military in 1994 and after. INTERPOL warrants for the Rwandan leadership have been issued worldwide and are making it impossible for Rwandan leaders to travel to EU countries, without fear of arrest. The indictments have also led to the call to remove Rwandan officers from their well-paid positions with UN peace-keeping mission in Darfur, and elsewhere in Africa.
On June 4, 2008, the ICTR Prosecutor also publicly announced to the Security Council that Kagame’s forces assassinated the entire Catholic leadership of Rwanda in 1994. In September 2007 and March 2008, former Chief ICTR Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte revealed that the evidence to prosecute members of Kagame’s regime has existed since at least 2003, and that she was ordered NOT to prosecute Kagame by the U.S. State Department, and was removed from office when she refused U.S. instructions.[2]
In January 2007 the former ICTR Chief Investigator, Australian Barrister Michael Hourigan provided sworn ICTR testimony describing Kagame’s responsibility for the assassination of the both previous Rwandan President and the President of Burundi…which were the crimes that precipitated the 90-days of mass violence now known as the “genocide.” Hourigan also ordered swore under oath that he was ordered NOT to prosecute Kagame and by Del Ponte’s predecessor, Louise Arbour, now UN High Commissioner for Refugees, and to turn over his notes of the investigation. However, he kept copies and they are now in evidence at the ICTR. [3]
ICTR Evidence Exposes Kagame’s Crimes
This is no surprise for those who have been closely following events at the ICTR, because evidence has been mounting for more than two years that the one-sided story of responsibility for crimes committed during the Rwanda War, which completely absolves Kagame and his forces of responsibility for crimes, is simply not true. Sworn witness testimony and original documents, have shown there no “plan” to kill civilians by the former Rwandan Government and military, and that Kagame’s Rwandan Patriotic Army carries a heavy burden of responsibility for crimes that have been charged to their war-time enemies.
Even former U.S. Ambassador to Rwanda, Robert Flaten, testified under oath that he specifically warned Kagame in late 1993 that massive civilian killings would result, if Kagame broke the cease-fire and returned to war.[4] The ICTR evidence shows that “returning to a war of aggression” is exactly what Kagame did by: (a) assassinating former Rwandan President Habyarimana in April 1994, and (b) preventing military forces from either side from stopping the civilian killings until Kagame’s forces had seized Kigali, the Rwandan capital, in July 1994. According to UN General Dallaire’s book and ICTR testimony, Kagame refused repeated offers of an unconditional ceasefire by the militarily weaker losing side for reasons of military strategy because, “he was winning…”
The Improbability of French Complicity
During the 14 years of the ICTR’s existence, neither the Rwanda Government nor the Office of the Prosecutor, nor the Defence, has produced any evidence of direct French involvement in the killings that resulted from Kagame’s invasion of Rwanda. In fact, had the French military not been withdrawn December 1993 and been replaced by the lightly-armed UNAMIR force in January 1994, it is highly unlikely that Kagame would have mounted his final assault for power in April 1994, at all, and the massive Rwandan tragedy could have been avoided. In February 1993, a small group of French soldiers had already prevented a military takeover by Kagame’s RPA army. However, the February assault turned one-sixth of the Rwandan population, more than a million people, into bitter, fearful, hungry, homeless, angry internal refugees[5]…and provided the motivation for Rwandan civilians to react with violence, when threatened by another assault following the assassination of the President in April 1994. [6]
The evidentiary record at the ICTR includes original UN and UN government documents from May –October 1994 that describe massive (so- far unprosecuted) atrocities in all of the areas of Rwanda controlled by Kagame’s forces. For example, on May 17, 1994, UN observers reported “20-30 bodies every 30 minutes” in the Akegara River in eastern Rwanda[7] and US State Department reports that Kagame’s forces were killing 10,000 a month in July and August 1994 in one small part of Rwanda.[8] In fall 1994, both Amnesty International[9] and Human Rights Watch[10] issued reports of massive killing and exclusion of reporters and human rights activists from areas of Rwanda controlled by Kagame’s forces. Documents in evidence at the ICTR also describe a systematic cover-up of these crimes with the assistance of the US Government and UN personnel, including Kofi Annan, beginning in August 1994 and continuing to the present.[11]
Kagame’s “Big Lie:” Politicized Human Rights in Africa
That a report accusing the French of crimes should be issued by Kagame’s Government now, following the revelation of a growing mountain of evidence of crimes for which he and his forces are responsible is not surprising. What IS surprising is how incredulously the well-meaning “human rights community” has swallowed the “Big Lie” wholesale, without understanding the nature of the Rwanda War or examining the factual record that exists at the ICTR, and original, contemporaneous reports from UN and U.S. Government agencies regarding what actually did happen in Rwanda in 1994.
It is particularly ironic that this flood of criticism of France, unleashed at Kagame’s behest, should so closely follow the massive criticism of Robert Mugabe’s manipulation of the Zimbabwe election. The reports of EU monitors following the 2003 Rwanda “election,” which Kagame won with 95% of the vote, read like a blueprint for Mugabe’s tactics in 2008:
· Opposing parties declared illegal and “divisionist”;
· A former President (Pasteur Bizimungu) jailed for presuming to run against Kagame;
· Opposition party members imprisoned and killed;
· Election dates moved-up 3 months to make opposition campaigning impossible; and,
· widespread violence and assassination of opposition supporters.[12]
Mugabe has been roundly (qnd justly) vilified for applying the same “election” tactics pioneered by Kagame five years ago, about which not a word of criticism has been heard. Perhaps the “believers” who appear to have taken the Rwandan Report seriously can also explain why Kagame has not been held to the same standard?
But the irony does not stop there. A 2003 UN Security Council report describes massive crimes committed by Kagame’s Rwanda army (now 70,000 troops versus 7,000, when France was assisting Rwanda in 1990) that invaded and occupied vast portions of the eastern Congo in 1996 and 1998. [13] The UN report also describes how the Kagame Regime is confiscating the Congo’s mineral resources and diverting the Congo’s riches to Rwanda. The Rwandan invasion of the Congo has led to a 12-year war in which more than 6 million have died, and is still going on today. Although little reported in the U.S. and Western press, more civilians die in the Congo every 4-months than the total killed in Darfur…..but it is Darfur that is labeled a “genocide.”
The “Big Lie”, the Rwanda Tribunal and the Search for Truth
The “Big Lie” is an old tactic and, so far, that has worked quite well for Kagame, his supporters and benefactors. But, by trying to shift blame for his own crimes to France, he and the Rwandan Government may have gone too far. The Security Council (on which both the U.S. and France have a veto) will meet in September to discuss the future of the ICTR. The U.S. has been pushing the Council to cut-off funding, which will make it impossible to investigate and prosecute the crimes of Kagame and his henchmen. But, Rwanda’s accusations of direct French complicity in genocide, “the crime of crimes,” changes the political dynamic in the Security Council. Now, it is imperative that the ICTR mandate be extended for along enough period of time to provide a forum to vindicate the honor of France; to avoid further accusation that France is being treated with impunity by a UN body, upon which France holds a permanent seat; and, to fully investigate and prosecute the crimes of Kagame and his regime that have recently come to light.
Should the Security Council vote to end the mandate of the ICTR by 2008 at the U.S. has demanded, the world will be forever left with the impression that Kagame’s “Big Lie,” implicating France in genocide, may be true. And, the U.S.-supported Kagame Regime will have effectively been granted impunity for the massive crimes for which evidence has already been produced at the ICTR, and admitted by numerous members of the ICTR Prosecutor’s office.
The Tainted ICTR May Yet Be Vindicated
If the Security Council extends the life of the ICTR, and the Tribunal is permitted to follow the evidence of Rwandan, and the alleged French , as well as U.S. involvement involvement with Kagame’sRPF are fully investigated and prosecuted, it is possible that the ICTR can rise above political manipulations that have, so far, resulted in the most blatant sort of “victor’s justice” since the Tokyo Tribunal failed to prosecute the U.S. firebomibing of civilian Tokyo and the nuclear devastation of Hiroshima and Nagaski.[14] To become a legitimate juridical institution based in law, rather than big-power politics, the ICTR must hold accountable all who are responsible for the Rwanda tragedy …including the super-power United States that pays most of the bills at the ICTR, as well as its ally in the war for influence and control in Central Africa….Kagame’ s regime in Rwanda.
At the end of the day, the accusations leveled against France by the Kagame Government may yet prove be its own undoing.
- 30 -
[1] Professor of Law, Wm Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, MN 55105, President ADAD (Association des Avocats de la Defence) Arusha, TZ, past-President, National Lawyers Guild, peter.erlinder@ wmitchell. edu. The references herein can be found in a paper presented by the author at the University of Paris, May 31, 2008 and several thousand additional contemporaneous UN documents and ICTR exhibits can be accessed on the author’s Rwanda Documents Project website: www.rwandadocuments project.net.
[2] Hartmann, Paix et chatiment les gueres de la politique (Flamarion, Paris September 27, 2007), p. 271-72:
[3] ICTR defence evidence in Military-I, Exhibit DNT 365. March 8.2007 Affidavit of QC Michael Hourigan (and supporting affidavit of Amadou Deme):
In late January or early February 1997 members of the National Team were approached by three (3) informants (either former or serving member of the RPF) claimed direct involvement in the 1994 fatal rocket attack on the President’s aircraft. Their evidence specifically implicated the direct involvement of President Paul Kagame, members of his administration and military. The informants also advised that the Kagame administration was actively involved in covert operations aimed at murdering high profile ex-patriot Rwandans – one such murder was the death of Seth Sendashonga in Nairobi.
[4] ICTR Military-I testimony of U.S. Ambassador to Rwanda 1990-1993, Robert Flaten, July 2006
[5] ICTR Military-I exhibit DNT 315. April 7, 1994 cable of Amb. Prudence Bushnell: “If, as it appears, both Presidents have been killed, there is a strong likelihood that widespread violence could break out either or both countries, particularly if it is confirmed that the plane was shot down.”
[6] ICTR Military-I exhibit DNT 315. April 7, 1994 cable of Amb. Prudence Bushnell: “If, as it appears, both Presidents have been killed, there is a strong likelihood that widespread violence could break out either or both countries, particularly if it is confirmed that the plane was shot down.”
[7] ICTR Military-I exhibit DNT 259. May 17, 1994 UNCHR Report of RPF killings at Rusomo Bridge to Tanzania, over Kagera River, in southeastern Rwanda.
[8] ICTR Military-1 Evidence, DNT 264.
[9] A ICTR Military-I defense Exhibit DNT 258:mnesty International, Rwanda: Reports of killings and abductions by the Rwandese Patriotic Army, April-August 1994, October 20, 1994:
[10] ICTR Military-I defense Exhibit DNT 261:
Human Rights Watch, Absence of Prosecution, Continued Killings, Sept. 1994.
[11] See, ICTR Military-I testimony of fmr. RPF Foreign Minister Jean-Marie Ndagiyimana, November 2006 and related documents.
[12] See generally, Waugh, Paul Kagame and Rwanda: Power, Genocide and the Rwandan Patriotic Front (MacFarland USA 2004)
[13] See, UN Panel of Experts Report on the Illegal Exploitation of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, October 20, 2003.
[14] Former Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara has famously observed in the recent popular film, “The Fog of War” that he,r and others who planned the firebombing of Tokyo, would have been prosecuted as war criminals had the Japanese won the war in the Pacific.
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Rwanda Accuses French Leaders of Complicity in Genocide
Prof. Peter Erlinder[1]
ARUSHA, TZ – August 7 – On August 5 the Kagame Government of Rwanda issued a 500-page report accusing dozens of French officials with complicity in the 1994 massacres of civilians in Rwanda, including former Foreign Minister Villepin and President Mitterand. The “French Genocide Report” is a perfect example of Hitlerian “Big Lie” strategy.…designed to shift world attention away from the growing body of evidence that Rwandan President Kagame, himself, is a war criminal who is primarily responsible for the tragedy that has come to be commonly known as the “Rwanda genocide.” Most press coverage of the “French Report” failed to note that Kagame, and much of the Rwandan leadership, is already under indictment for War Crimes and Genocide in both France and Spain, and that the “French Report” is a response to existing indictments of Rwanda’s leaders.
Growing Evidence of Kagame’s Responsibility
for War Crimes and Genocide
Rwanda’s “French Report” admits that the investigation of French involvement only began in 2006, apparently only days after French Judge Bruguiere indicted members of Kagame’s Government for War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and Genocide. Bruguiere also requested through Kofi Annan that the UN Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) prosecute Kagame for the assassination of the previous President of Rwanda, and for initiating the violence that led to the massive civilian killings in 1994. But, it is not only France that is seeking the arrest and prosecution of Kagame and his followers.
In February 2008, Spanish Judge Andreu issued a second 180-page indictment that details War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and Genocide committed by Kagame and his military in 1994 and after. INTERPOL warrants for the Rwandan leadership have been issued worldwide and are making it impossible for Rwandan leaders to travel to EU countries, without fear of arrest. The indictments have also led to the call to remove Rwandan officers from their well-paid positions with UN peace-keeping mission in Darfur, and elsewhere in Africa.
On June 4, 2008, the ICTR Prosecutor also publicly announced to the Security Council that Kagame’s forces assassinated the entire Catholic leadership of Rwanda in 1994. In September 2007 and March 2008, former Chief ICTR Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte revealed that the evidence to prosecute members of Kagame’s regime has existed since at least 2003, and that she was ordered NOT to prosecute Kagame by the U.S. State Department, and was removed from office when she refused U.S. instructions.[2]
In January 2007 the former ICTR Chief Investigator, Australian Barrister Michael Hourigan provided sworn ICTR testimony describing Kagame’s responsibility for the assassination of the both previous Rwandan President and the President of Burundi…which were the crimes that precipitated the 90-days of mass violence now known as the “genocide.” Hourigan also ordered swore under oath that he was ordered NOT to prosecute Kagame and by Del Ponte’s predecessor, Louise Arbour, now UN High Commissioner for Refugees, and to turn over his notes of the investigation. However, he kept copies and they are now in evidence at the ICTR. [3]
ICTR Evidence Exposes Kagame’s Crimes
This is no surprise for those who have been closely following events at the ICTR, because evidence has been mounting for more than two years that the one-sided story of responsibility for crimes committed during the Rwanda War, which completely absolves Kagame and his forces of responsibility for crimes, is simply not true. Sworn witness testimony and original documents, have shown there no “plan” to kill civilians by the former Rwandan Government and military, and that Kagame’s Rwandan Patriotic Army carries a heavy burden of responsibility for crimes that have been charged to their war-time enemies.
Even former U.S. Ambassador to Rwanda, Robert Flaten, testified under oath that he specifically warned Kagame in late 1993 that massive civilian killings would result, if Kagame broke the cease-fire and returned to war.[4] The ICTR evidence shows that “returning to a war of aggression” is exactly what Kagame did by: (a) assassinating former Rwandan President Habyarimana in April 1994, and (b) preventing military forces from either side from stopping the civilian killings until Kagame’s forces had seized Kigali, the Rwandan capital, in July 1994. According to UN General Dallaire’s book and ICTR testimony, Kagame refused repeated offers of an unconditional ceasefire by the militarily weaker losing side for reasons of military strategy because, “he was winning…”
The Improbability of French Complicity
During the 14 years of the ICTR’s existence, neither the Rwanda Government nor the Office of the Prosecutor, nor the Defence, has produced any evidence of direct French involvement in the killings that resulted from Kagame’s invasion of Rwanda. In fact, had the French military not been withdrawn December 1993 and been replaced by the lightly-armed UNAMIR force in January 1994, it is highly unlikely that Kagame would have mounted his final assault for power in April 1994, at all, and the massive Rwandan tragedy could have been avoided. In February 1993, a small group of French soldiers had already prevented a military takeover by Kagame’s RPA army. However, the February assault turned one-sixth of the Rwandan population, more than a million people, into bitter, fearful, hungry, homeless, angry internal refugees[5]…and provided the motivation for Rwandan civilians to react with violence, when threatened by another assault following the assassination of the President in April 1994. [6]
The evidentiary record at the ICTR includes original UN and UN government documents from May –October 1994 that describe massive (so- far unprosecuted) atrocities in all of the areas of Rwanda controlled by Kagame’s forces. For example, on May 17, 1994, UN observers reported “20-30 bodies every 30 minutes” in the Akegara River in eastern Rwanda[7] and US State Department reports that Kagame’s forces were killing 10,000 a month in July and August 1994 in one small part of Rwanda.[8] In fall 1994, both Amnesty International[9] and Human Rights Watch[10] issued reports of massive killing and exclusion of reporters and human rights activists from areas of Rwanda controlled by Kagame’s forces. Documents in evidence at the ICTR also describe a systematic cover-up of these crimes with the assistance of the US Government and UN personnel, including Kofi Annan, beginning in August 1994 and continuing to the present.[11]
Kagame’s “Big Lie:” Politicized Human Rights in Africa
That a report accusing the French of crimes should be issued by Kagame’s Government now, following the revelation of a growing mountain of evidence of crimes for which he and his forces are responsible is not surprising. What IS surprising is how incredulously the well-meaning “human rights community” has swallowed the “Big Lie” wholesale, without understanding the nature of the Rwanda War or examining the factual record that exists at the ICTR, and original, contemporaneous reports from UN and U.S. Government agencies regarding what actually did happen in Rwanda in 1994.
It is particularly ironic that this flood of criticism of France, unleashed at Kagame’s behest, should so closely follow the massive criticism of Robert Mugabe’s manipulation of the Zimbabwe election. The reports of EU monitors following the 2003 Rwanda “election,” which Kagame won with 95% of the vote, read like a blueprint for Mugabe’s tactics in 2008:
· Opposing parties declared illegal and “divisionist”;
· A former President (Pasteur Bizimungu) jailed for presuming to run against Kagame;
· Opposition party members imprisoned and killed;
· Election dates moved-up 3 months to make opposition campaigning impossible; and,
· widespread violence and assassination of opposition supporters.[12]
Mugabe has been roundly (qnd justly) vilified for applying the same “election” tactics pioneered by Kagame five years ago, about which not a word of criticism has been heard. Perhaps the “believers” who appear to have taken the Rwandan Report seriously can also explain why Kagame has not been held to the same standard?
But the irony does not stop there. A 2003 UN Security Council report describes massive crimes committed by Kagame’s Rwanda army (now 70,000 troops versus 7,000, when France was assisting Rwanda in 1990) that invaded and occupied vast portions of the eastern Congo in 1996 and 1998. [13] The UN report also describes how the Kagame Regime is confiscating the Congo’s mineral resources and diverting the Congo’s riches to Rwanda. The Rwandan invasion of the Congo has led to a 12-year war in which more than 6 million have died, and is still going on today. Although little reported in the U.S. and Western press, more civilians die in the Congo every 4-months than the total killed in Darfur…..but it is Darfur that is labeled a “genocide.”
The “Big Lie”, the Rwanda Tribunal and the Search for Truth
The “Big Lie” is an old tactic and, so far, that has worked quite well for Kagame, his supporters and benefactors. But, by trying to shift blame for his own crimes to France, he and the Rwandan Government may have gone too far. The Security Council (on which both the U.S. and France have a veto) will meet in September to discuss the future of the ICTR. The U.S. has been pushing the Council to cut-off funding, which will make it impossible to investigate and prosecute the crimes of Kagame and his henchmen. But, Rwanda’s accusations of direct French complicity in genocide, “the crime of crimes,” changes the political dynamic in the Security Council. Now, it is imperative that the ICTR mandate be extended for along enough period of time to provide a forum to vindicate the honor of France; to avoid further accusation that France is being treated with impunity by a UN body, upon which France holds a permanent seat; and, to fully investigate and prosecute the crimes of Kagame and his regime that have recently come to light.
Should the Security Council vote to end the mandate of the ICTR by 2008 at the U.S. has demanded, the world will be forever left with the impression that Kagame’s “Big Lie,” implicating France in genocide, may be true. And, the U.S.-supported Kagame Regime will have effectively been granted impunity for the massive crimes for which evidence has already been produced at the ICTR, and admitted by numerous members of the ICTR Prosecutor’s office.
The Tainted ICTR May Yet Be Vindicated
If the Security Council extends the life of the ICTR, and the Tribunal is permitted to follow the evidence of Rwandan, and the alleged French , as well as U.S. involvement involvement with Kagame’sRPF are fully investigated and prosecuted, it is possible that the ICTR can rise above political manipulations that have, so far, resulted in the most blatant sort of “victor’s justice” since the Tokyo Tribunal failed to prosecute the U.S. firebomibing of civilian Tokyo and the nuclear devastation of Hiroshima and Nagaski.[14] To become a legitimate juridical institution based in law, rather than big-power politics, the ICTR must hold accountable all who are responsible for the Rwanda tragedy …including the super-power United States that pays most of the bills at the ICTR, as well as its ally in the war for influence and control in Central Africa….Kagame’ s regime in Rwanda.
At the end of the day, the accusations leveled against France by the Kagame Government may yet prove be its own undoing.
- 30 -
[1] Professor of Law, Wm Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, MN 55105, President ADAD (Association des Avocats de la Defence) Arusha, TZ, past-President, National Lawyers Guild, peter.erlinder@ wmitchell. edu. The references herein can be found in a paper presented by the author at the University of Paris, May 31, 2008 and several thousand additional contemporaneous UN documents and ICTR exhibits can be accessed on the author’s Rwanda Documents Project website: www.rwandadocuments project.net.
[2] Hartmann, Paix et chatiment les gueres de la politique (Flamarion, Paris September 27, 2007), p. 271-72:
[3] ICTR defence evidence in Military-I, Exhibit DNT 365. March 8.2007 Affidavit of QC Michael Hourigan (and supporting affidavit of Amadou Deme):
In late January or early February 1997 members of the National Team were approached by three (3) informants (either former or serving member of the RPF) claimed direct involvement in the 1994 fatal rocket attack on the President’s aircraft. Their evidence specifically implicated the direct involvement of President Paul Kagame, members of his administration and military. The informants also advised that the Kagame administration was actively involved in covert operations aimed at murdering high profile ex-patriot Rwandans – one such murder was the death of Seth Sendashonga in Nairobi.
[4] ICTR Military-I testimony of U.S. Ambassador to Rwanda 1990-1993, Robert Flaten, July 2006
[5] ICTR Military-I exhibit DNT 315. April 7, 1994 cable of Amb. Prudence Bushnell: “If, as it appears, both Presidents have been killed, there is a strong likelihood that widespread violence could break out either or both countries, particularly if it is confirmed that the plane was shot down.”
[6] ICTR Military-I exhibit DNT 315. April 7, 1994 cable of Amb. Prudence Bushnell: “If, as it appears, both Presidents have been killed, there is a strong likelihood that widespread violence could break out either or both countries, particularly if it is confirmed that the plane was shot down.”
[7] ICTR Military-I exhibit DNT 259. May 17, 1994 UNCHR Report of RPF killings at Rusomo Bridge to Tanzania, over Kagera River, in southeastern Rwanda.
[8] ICTR Military-1 Evidence, DNT 264.
[9] A ICTR Military-I defense Exhibit DNT 258:mnesty International, Rwanda: Reports of killings and abductions by the Rwandese Patriotic Army, April-August 1994, October 20, 1994:
[10] ICTR Military-I defense Exhibit DNT 261:
Human Rights Watch, Absence of Prosecution, Continued Killings, Sept. 1994.
[11] See, ICTR Military-I testimony of fmr. RPF Foreign Minister Jean-Marie Ndagiyimana, November 2006 and related documents.
[12] See generally, Waugh, Paul Kagame and Rwanda: Power, Genocide and the Rwandan Patriotic Front (MacFarland USA 2004)
[13] See, UN Panel of Experts Report on the Illegal Exploitation of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, October 20, 2003.
[14] Former Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara has famously observed in the recent popular film, “The Fog of War” that he,r and others who planned the firebombing of Tokyo, would have been prosecuted as war criminals had the Japanese won the war in the Pacific.
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet it cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
LES DROITS DE L’HOMME SELON LES OCCIDENTAUX
Par Jean-Jacques NGANGWESHE
Triste est de constater que les pays qui affichent sur leurs frontons : défenseurs des droits de l’homme et de la liberté, comme la France, l’Espagne, l’Angleterre, la Hollande, l’Israël, les USA, etc., sont les premiers pays qui colonisent injustement et arbitrairement différents peuples du monde et qui occupent par la force de nombreux territoires dans le monde contre la volonté de leurs peuples.
Cependant, ils trompent le monde avec l’armada des journalistes professionnels détenant d’importants moyens techniques audiovisuels et radiophoniques et qui diffusent des messages de propagandes, distillant des contre-vérités démagogiques sur la défense des libertés et des droits de l’homme. Ces campagnes de propagande sont relayées par des associations des droits de l’homme comme Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Ligue des Droits de l’Homme, Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF), etc.
Voici un exemple frappant : ce n’est pas du fait que les violations de droits de l’homme en Afrique préoccupent tellement la Maison Blanche que les Etats-Unis ont choisi Lopez Lomong, spécialiste du 1500 m , ancien réfugié soudanais au Kenya et militant pour le Darfour, comme porte-drapeau de leur délégation aux jeux olympiques de Beijing. C’est plutôt leurs intérêts stratégiques qui les y ont poussés.
Au Soudan, tout comme dans le reste de l’Afrique, les Etats-Unis voient d’un mauvais œil la percée économique ou l’avancée de la Chine, laquelle signe des contrats pétroliers et miniers avec plusieurs gouvernements.
Ce ne sont donc pas les droits de l’homme qui comptent pour les Etats-Unis, lesquels n’ont pas hésité à pousser le Rwanda, l’Ouganda et le Burundi à agresser la République Démocratique du Congo. Cette invasion injuste a coûté la vie à plus de 5 millions de Congolais tandis que les richesses naturelles et minérales ont été systématiquement pillées.
Mais la vérité est têtue et la liberté demeure l’idéal que chercheront toujours à réaliser les peuples qui sont dominés, écrasés et qui vivent dans la soumission absolue des impérialistes. Monsieur Robert Ménard, Secrétaire Général du RSF avec son pays la France, colonise le peuple kanak, guadeloupéens, guyanais, martiniquais, etc., qui demandent l’indépendance de leurs pays respectifs et leur liberté. Ces populations sont opprimées depuis plusieurs siècles.
Nul ne peut oublier l’assassinat odieux et ignoble des leaders nationalistes Jean-Marie Tjibaou, Eloi Machoro et de centaines de milliers des villageoises et villageois kanaks. En guise de preuves, voici le rappel de certains faits.
Primo : Les assassinats sommaires et les arrestations systématiques des différents leaders nationalistes des territoires et départements d’outre-mer, à l’instar de Jean-Marie Tjibaou, Eloi Machoro et tant d’autres.
Tjibaou était un homme politique non violent. Fils d'un chef de tribu et devenu leader nationaliste kanak, il est né en 1936 et assassiné à Ouvéa en 1989 par un tireur d’élite de la Gendarmerie française ; ce qui était un crime gratuit. Ordonné prêtre en 1965 à Ouvéa, il n’avait cessé, pourtant, de prôner la culture du dialogue et d’amitiés entre les peuples.
Le 5 décembre 1984, il avait payé très cher sa nomination à la tête du FLNKS (Front de Libération Nationale Kanak Socialiste). Lors de sa création, dix Kanak - parmi lesquels deux de ses frères qui roulaient dans la voiture qu'il aurait dû occuper - ont été assassinés par des colons européens dans une embuscade à Hienghène sur la route qui menait à ce congrès de FLNKS. Le RSF n’a jamais condamné ce massacre odieux.
Jean-Marie Tjibaou (Prêtre
Catholique non violent)
Par la suite, ce leader nationaliste a été assassiné le 4 mai 1989 avec Yeiwéné Yeiwéné, victime d’un complot ourdi par le pouvoir colonial français. Tjibaou était élu démocratiquement à plusieurs reprises par le peuple kanak dans différents postes publics.
Un autre leader politique nationaliste kanak, Eloi Machoro, qui avait été élu démocratiquement aux élections organisées par le pouvoir colonial, a été assassiné le 12 janvier 1985 près de Canala par des tireurs d’élite de la Gendarmerie française débarqués sur place spécialement pour tuer systématiquement les personnes qui demandaient la liberté et l’indépendance. Mais le RSF n’avait pas, non plus, dénoncé cet odieux crime barbare perpétré par la France
Le jour du massacre des Kanak, le Secrétaire Général du RSF, Mr Robert Menard, ce fameux «défenseur des droits de l’homme» et ses collaborateurs avaient défendu le colonialisme et l’impérialisme français contre les pauvres paysans kanak. Le silence de cette association avait placé une chape de plomb sur les libertés des peuples opprimés dans le monde. En outre, des centaines des Kanak croupissent dans les geôles françaises.
La seule faute et le seul grief des nationalistes guadeloupéens, kanak, guyanais et martiniquais ont été d’avoir revendiqué la liberté et l’indépendance de leurs pays qui sont devenus par la volonté des colonialistes, départements et territoires français d’outre-mer.
Les colonialistes n’ont pas honte, parce que les territoires et départements d’outre-mer demeurent une aberration qu’un homme épris de bon sens et de justice ne saurait admettre. En effet, comment peut-on annexer de force des pays entiers qui se situent dans des continents lointains (africain, américain, asiatique et océanique) et dont les peuples font montre de grandes différences culturelles avec le peuple français métropolitain ? Et pourquoi faire encore aujourd’hui la guerre contre ces peuples dans le but de les dominer et de les exploiter ?
Pour la presse occidentale ainsi que de nombreuses associations occidentales des droits de l’homme, la liberté est une réalité quand la France colonise les autres peuples contre leur volonté depuis des siècles. Ainsi, les dirigeants de l’association RSF se taisent et se voilent la face. Cependant, Mr Robert Menard se fâche et crie en public au scandale quand la Chine continue d’occuper le Tibet.
Secundo: L’Angleterre peut occuper et massacrer des milliers d’Argentins des îles Malouines situées à quatorze mille kilomètres de la Grande Bretagne sans émouvoir l’association RSF et ses dirigeants. De même, l’Espagne peut continuer de coloniser et de tuer des soldats et civils marocains dans le Détroit de Gibraltar en occupant une portion des terres marocaines (Ceuta et Melilla) sans que cela n’émeuve Mr Menard pour le condamner avec force.
En revanche, il s’insurge du fait de voir la Russie refuser la sécession de la Tchétchénie et demande des sanctions internationales contre elle.
Une autre situation tragique est celle de cette Palestine meurtrie. Lorsque les Palestiniens, assujettis à l’esclavage dans leur propre territoire, se lèvent contre leur oppression et exploitation éhontée du fait de la colonisation, par le feu et par le sang, de leur pays par Israël, Mr Menard et son association les condamnent avec la dernière énergie.
Tercio : Quand les Afrikaners, principalement d’origine hollandaise, française et anglo-saxonne, instaurent la politique de l’apartheid en Afrique du Sud, Mr Menard et son groupe préfèrent condamner les militants de l’ANC qui combattent leur assujettissement.
Il y a lieu de signaler que l’apartheid, en tant que système politique fondé sur la discrimination et la ségrégation raciales, est demeuré vivace en Afrique du Sud en dépit du fait que ce sont les Noirs qui y détiennent aujourd’hui le pouvoir. Les Afrikaners se comportent toujours en seigneurs sans que les associations occidentales des droits de l’homme ne critiquent, ni ne dénoncent cette politique.
En Cote d’Ivoire, l’armée française a commis des massacres, les hélicoptères d’attaque au sol et des blindés ont tiré, sans discontinuer, sur des foules, des civils non armés, et des légionnaires français ont tué plusieurs civils ivoiriens. Cela n’a pas ému Mr Robert Menard qui n’a pas condamné les forfaits de l’armée de son pays en terre étrangère.
En outre, le RSF ne dit rien sur le camp de concentration de Guantanamo, mais critique la Chine à propos du Tibet et demande au boycott des jeux olympiques.
Les peuples opprimés du monde ne constatent-ils pas qu’il y a une justice à deux vitesses, l’une - qui consacre l’impunité - pour les puissances impérialistes, notamment occidentales, et l’autre pour sévir avec la dernière énergie contre les peuples opprimés.
Pourquoi cette situation de deux poids et deux mesures ? Tout simplement parce que les anciens colonialistes sont de nouveau contre les nouveaux. Or, le colonialisme est un fléau et une barbarie que nous devons combattre avec la dernière énergie. Nul peuple ne peut être soumis en esclavage par un autre ; nul peuple ne peut être dominé et colonisé par un autre.
Nous devrons combattre tout système qui rétrograde les valeurs universelles de l’homme. Qu’il vienne de l’Occident, du Japon, de la Chine, de l’Inde ou du Brésil. Qu’il soit lion ou tigre, un fauve reste toujours dangereux pour l’homme. Il en est ainsi de l’impérialisme dont le colonialisme et le néocolonialisme constituent des avatars qui resteront toujours dangereux pour les opprimés.
Quarto: L’invasion militaire de l’Irak par les USA et la Grande-Bretagne a été suivie par des exécutions sommaires systématiques ayant causé des millions de morts ; ce qui est une barbarie sans commune mesure et sans précédent dans l’histoire de l’Irak.
Aucun organisme de la société civile ou association de défense des droits de l’homme n’a levé le petit doigt pour défendre les victimes irakiens, ni condamné la boucherie de plus de 2.000.000 des civils, mais l’association Human Rights Watch et la presse occidentale regrettent plus des 3.000 soldats américains envahisseurs de l’Irak qui sont morts dans le territoire d’un pays soumis en esclavage.
Camp de concentration de Guantanamo (Violation flagrante de droit
de l’homme, de nombreux prisonniers sont des innocents) / Guantanamo
est un territoire de la république Cubaine occupé par les américains par
la tricherie de l’ancien président Enzo Batista qui a cédé le territoire
pour 70.000 dollars.aux Américains
LES PRISONNIERS DONT BEAUCOUP D’INNONCENTS PIEDS
ET MAINS LIES (TRANSPORTES COMME DU BETAIL)
La presse soi-disant de liberté ne dit rien sur les massacres de 2.000.000 d’Irakiens tués par les bombardements chirurgicaux des avions et hélicoptères américains et alliés. Comment peut-on ignorer plus de deux millions (2.000.000) de morts irakiens et ne regretter que 3.000 militaires américains ? Comment peut-on ignorer plus d’un million des blessés irakiens, mais regretter seulement les quelques milliers de soldats américains blessés ? Pourquoi le RSF ne dit rien sur plus de 200.000 Irakiens emprisonnés en Irak et dans les prisons secrètes en Europe ?
Pourquoi le RSF ne dit rien sur la torture, les crimes de guerre, les crimes contre l’humanité que subissent les Irakiens par les occupants Américains et Britanniques en Irak ?
Allez vite vivre les réalités des tortures dans le site ci-après (www.syti.net/Kiosque/Kiosque_TortureUSA.html) pour constater les horreurs, comme les orgies ci-après.
LES CONDITIONS INHUMAINE IMPOSSIBLE D’ALLONGER
LES PIEDS, LES CONDITIONS QUE LES ASSOCIATIONS DE
DROIT DE L’HOMME NE CONDAMNE PAS
Les soldats de la démocratie américaine ont interdit
les Irakiens de faire la prière, ils les ont exigés de
Former une pyramide humaine humiliante
Dans le pays de l’Oncle Sam, l’Homme noir n’a jamais eu de place, mais en réalité, il demeure quotidiennement victime des interpellations et d’arrestations de faciès suivi des condamnations disproportionnées. La minorité noire vit un calvaire en Amérique. En outre, ils ne bénéficient d’aucune protection sociale et, sans ressources, beaucoup meurent de faim comme dans les pays du tiers-monde, mais motus et bouche cousue. Les emprisonnements systématiques et sommaires des Noirs américains pour les délits de faciès suivis des exécutions sommaires dans les chambres à gaz ou par injection.
Les soldats américains exigeants les Irakiens Croyants
de faire la fellation entre eux pendant la prière
Voici un exemple parmi des milliers d’autres : le cas du journaliste noir américain Mumia Abou Jamal. La vérité est que plusieurs de ces prisonniers noirs sont des innocents que les juges démocrates racistes condamnent sans preuve. Le journaliste noir américain Mumia Abou Jamal croupit depuis plusieurs années dans le couloir de la mort.
Le récit succinct de l’histoire de Mumia Abu-Jamal révèle qu’il est né le 24 avril 1954. A l’âge de 14 ans, il avait été arrêté et battu pour avoir protesté contre un meeting du candidat ultra-raciste George Wallace, à Philadelphie. Peu après, il a été fiché par le FBI pour avoir voulu rebaptiser son lycée du nom du grand dirigeant afro-américain “Malcolm X”. En 1969, le jeune homme était chargé de l’information à la section de Philadelphie du Black Panther Party (BPP).
Le FBI le considérait comme l’une des personnes “à surveiller et interner en cas d’alerte nationale”. Il était l’une des cibles du Cointelpro (programme d’infiltration et de contre-espionnage) dont ont été victimes Leonard Peltier et d’autres membres de l’Américan Indian Movement et des Black Panthers.
Devenu journaliste de radio apprécié et lauréat de plusieurs prix, Mumia est surnommé “la voix des sans-voix” pour sa critique de la corruption de la Police et des dirigeants politiques locaux. Depuis 1978, il dénonçait la violente répression qui frappait la communauté MOVE et, en 1981, il a suivi le procès de son fondateur, John Africa, qui a été acquitté des charges fabriquées contre lui. Le soutien de Mumia à MOVE a exaspéré les hommes politiques et la Police de Philadelphie et lui a valu le renvoi d’une des stations de radio où il était affecté.
Aussi, Mumia était-il contraint de travailler comme taximen de nuit pour faire vivre sa famille. Aux premières heures du 9 décembre 1981, Mumia Abu-Jamal a été grièvement blessé lors d’une fusillade dans le quartier sud de la ville où il est venu déposer un client. Arrêté, il est accusé du meurtre d’un policier, Daniel Faulkner, tué dans cette fusillade.
Malgré ses dénégations et l’absence d’antécédents judiciaires, une enquête inéquitable (expertises balistiques inexistantes, balles non identifiables, absence de relevé d’empreintes, zone des faits non sécurisée, tests non effectués, etc.) a conclu à la culpabilité de Mumia. Témoins menacés, subornés, écartés, rapports de police contradictoires, violations de ses droits, mèneront, en juillet 1982, à la condamnation à mort de cet opposant politique gênant sous la pression d’un juge recordman qui a exigé cette sentence. Mumia était, par la couleur de sa peau et son action militante, “le coupable idéal”.
MUMIA ABOU JAMAL
Néanmoins, un ancien tueur à gages, Arnold Beverly, a, en juin 1999, avoué à l’une des avocates de Mumia avoir tué l’officier Faulkner dans le cadre d’un contrat mêlant police et mafia. Corroborés par un faisceau d’éléments et de témoignages concordants, les aveux de Beverly n’ont jamais été entendus par la justice sur la base du prétexte qu’ils ont été fournis “hors des délais de la procédure”.
Vous pourrez lire la suite de ce triste histoire dans plusieurs langues sur le site des défenseurs de Mumia : (http://www.mumiabujamal.net).
Ni Mr Robert Menard du « Reporters sans Frontières », ni les autres journalistes propagandistes occidentaux n’ont levé le petit doigt pour condamner cette situation injuste d’Abou Jamal. Il sera bientôt exécuté. A Paris, on n’a jamais vu un seul membre de RSF dans des manifestations réclamant la libération de Mumia.
L’Etat d’Israël qui condamne la Chine contre les violations des droits de l’homme est un cas qui relève de la conscience et de l’inconscience humaine. Le peuple israélien, dont la nation juive constitue la principale composante, compte parmi ceux qui, avec les Noirs, ont le plus souffert des atrocités de la part des autres hommes sur notre planète.
Pour autant, au risque de se moquer du monde, on ne saurait occulter la vérité : Israël est le pays qui tue chaque jour, au moins, un enfant palestinien et qui arrête et emprisonne chaque jour, au moins, 5 civils palestiniens, D’ailleurs, les deux tiers de la population palestinienne –tous ceux qui vivent effectivement en Palestine et non, en Israël et dans d’autres pays étrangers - sont en prison en Israël et beaucoup y subissent des sévices en tous genres.
Alors, il faudrait que l’on évite de vivre dans un monde des rigolos et des mythomanes : les donneurs de leçons sont des Etats qui violent systématiquement les droits humains les plus élémentaires.
Quinto: les soldats britanniques continuent de massacrer les civils argentins dans les îles Malouines (Falkland en anglais, Islas Malvinas en espagnol), un archipel de l'Atlantique Sud situé à 480 km des côtes de l'Argentine, mais à 14.000 km de l’Angleterre. La barbarie des soldats de sa Majesté est flagrante : des arrestations sommaires suivies des exécutions d’Argentins sans que la presse occidentale ne les condamne d’une quelconque façon.
LES SOLDATS ARGENTINS PRISONNIERS DES
SOLDATS BRITANIQUES SUR LEUR PROPRE TERRE
Sexto : La situation des sans papiers dans « les démocraties occidentales » : Triste est de constater que les valeurs inaliénables de l’homme sont foulés au pied, des pères de familles ont perdus leur dignité et l’honneur, ils ont perdus aussi leurs noms pour être rebaptiser par des appellations sans papiers, comme les juifs dans les camps Nazi. Les couples mixtes sont séparés de force, les parents africains sont expulsés, les femmes blanches restent tristes et seules a élevés les enfants.
Selon les dirigeants occidentaux, leurs associations instrumentalisées et leur presse stipendiée, les emprisonnements massifs, systématiques et sommaires des citoyens des pays pauvres dans les prisons des pays d’Europe participent du respect des droits de l’homme. Le délit des Africains qui remplissent les geôles des pays européens est le fait de ne pas présenter des titres de séjour en règle. Ils sont le plus souvent condamnés à trois ou six mois, voire à deux ans de prison ferme alors que ces Africains n’ont jamais volé ou insulté une personne, par contre les européens sans titre de séjour valable se prélassent en Afrique comme des princes et des seigneurs.
Beaucoup d’Africains sont victimes des bavures de la part de certains policiers européens qui n’hésitent pas à déchirer leurs titres de séjour et autres papiers d’identité tout en établissant des PV sur la base d’allégations fallacieuses. Certains sont torturés par la police des pays d’Europe, on a dénombré de nombreux cas de morts en Belgique, en France, en Italie, en Espagne, etc.
UN ENFANT AFRICAIN SANS PAPIER MENACE
PAR LA POLICE FRANÇAISE. IL RISQUE 3 MOIS
DE PRISON SELON LA LOI FRANCAISE
DES « SANS-PAPIERS » AFRICAINS DANS LA PRISON
EN BELGIQUE POUR FAIRE RESPECTER LES DROITS
DE L’HOMME DANS L’UNION EUROPEENNE.
Septimo : L’invasion militaire de la République Démocratique du Congo par les armées rwandaise, ougandaise et burundaise, à l’instigation et sous la protection des puissances étrangères, notamment, les Etats-Unis d’Amérique, l’Angleterre et la Belgique. Ces pays ont financé et armé les armées d’agressions.
Mais, le pire est que les Congolais pleurent chaque jour environ cinq millions de morts. Par ailleurs, le viol systématique des femmes autochtones congolaises est utilisé par des Rwandais – forces gouvernementales et leurs opposants - comme arme de guerre à l’Est du Congo où l’on assiste aux expulsions forcées des populations autochtones de leurs terres et à l’intensification de l’exploitation illicite des minerais stratégiques tels que le coltan et la cassitérite par les envahisseurs. Les crimes contre l’humanité commis à l’Est du Congo par les seigneurs de guerre rwandais - tutsi et hutu confondus - comme Nkundabatware Mihigo sont bien connus de tous.
Mais, Nkundabatware et ses compatriotes ne sont pas arrêtés et les USA, l’Angleterre et la Belgique n’ont jamais condamné le génocide de cinq millions des Congolais. Les clichés photographiques suivants montrent à suffisance ce que sont les atrocités subies par les populations congolaises dans les territoires toujours occupés par des troupes rwandaises, toutes tendances – forces régulières et rebelles confondues.
Ces crimes sont perpétrés sur les instructions du général Paul Kagamé, Président de la République du Rwanda, un Etat africain mercenaire, s’il en est, et dont l’actuel chef - à l’instar de son homologue de l’Ouganda, Mr Museveni - a été préparé - dans une académie militaire aux Etats-Unis, plus précisement à Arkansas chez Bill Clinton - par les puissances impérialistes occidentales pour jouer un role maccabre en Afrique centrale.
Rares sont les défenseurs des droits de l’homme occidentaux qui aient condamné ce génocide des populations congolaises perpétré par le Rwanda de Kagame, l’Ouganda de Museveni et le Burundi de Buyoya. Nombreux sont, cependant en Occident, ceux qui n’ont osé levé le petit doigt pour protester contre les crimes de guerre, de génocide et contre l’humanité commis par ceux qui se présentent comme les fidèles alliés des pays occidentaux, notamment, des Etats-Unis d’Amérique, de la Grande Bretagne et de la Belgique.
Des responsables politiques occidentaux ainsi que des dirigeants des associations des droits de l’homme présentes en Occident, notamment Robert Menard, n’ont jamais dit un mot sur le génocide au Congo. Le paradoxe de l’histoire est très étonnant et absurde : le Ministre belge des Affaires étrangères, Mr Karl de Gucht, a même accusé les Congolais d’avoir commis ces massacres eux-mêmes et il n’a pas hésité à innocenter le Rwanda et l’Ouganda.
Toutefois, son cas relève simplement de l’esprit vindicatif du colonialiste belge qui a mal accepté et digéré l’indépendance du Congo. Cependant, la Cour Internationale de Justice (CIJ), basée à la Haye , en Hollande, avait déjà condamné l’Ouganda.
Néanmoins, le Ministre belge et de nombreuses associations occidentales des droits de l’homme font chaque jour la démonstration que la vie d’un Congolais ne vaut rien contre celle d’un Tibétain.
LES DEUX HOMMES ONT ORGANISES ET PLANIFIES L’EXTERMINATION
EN GRANDE ECHELLE DE LA POPULATION CONGOLAISE DE MULENGE
DE MAKOBOLA BREF LE GENOCIDE A L’EST DE LA RD CONGO
La moindre des conclusions démontre bien volontiers qu’il existe très peu d’associations des droits de l’homme dans le monde, mais beaucoup plus d’associations de malfaisance qui sont corrompues dans des pratiques qui relèvent de la pure escroquerie organisée contre les vraies victimes des violations des droits humains à travers la planète.
Paris, mercredi, 13 / 08 / 2008
Jean-Jacques Ngangweshe
@ :Jean-jacques-ngangweshe@live.fr
@ :jjngangweshe@yahoo.fr
Par Jean-Jacques NGANGWESHE
Triste est de constater que les pays qui affichent sur leurs frontons : défenseurs des droits de l’homme et de la liberté, comme la France, l’Espagne, l’Angleterre, la Hollande, l’Israël, les USA, etc., sont les premiers pays qui colonisent injustement et arbitrairement différents peuples du monde et qui occupent par la force de nombreux territoires dans le monde contre la volonté de leurs peuples.
Cependant, ils trompent le monde avec l’armada des journalistes professionnels détenant d’importants moyens techniques audiovisuels et radiophoniques et qui diffusent des messages de propagandes, distillant des contre-vérités démagogiques sur la défense des libertés et des droits de l’homme. Ces campagnes de propagande sont relayées par des associations des droits de l’homme comme Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Ligue des Droits de l’Homme, Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF), etc.
Voici un exemple frappant : ce n’est pas du fait que les violations de droits de l’homme en Afrique préoccupent tellement la Maison Blanche que les Etats-Unis ont choisi Lopez Lomong, spécialiste du 1500 m , ancien réfugié soudanais au Kenya et militant pour le Darfour, comme porte-drapeau de leur délégation aux jeux olympiques de Beijing. C’est plutôt leurs intérêts stratégiques qui les y ont poussés.
Au Soudan, tout comme dans le reste de l’Afrique, les Etats-Unis voient d’un mauvais œil la percée économique ou l’avancée de la Chine, laquelle signe des contrats pétroliers et miniers avec plusieurs gouvernements.
Ce ne sont donc pas les droits de l’homme qui comptent pour les Etats-Unis, lesquels n’ont pas hésité à pousser le Rwanda, l’Ouganda et le Burundi à agresser la République Démocratique du Congo. Cette invasion injuste a coûté la vie à plus de 5 millions de Congolais tandis que les richesses naturelles et minérales ont été systématiquement pillées.
Mais la vérité est têtue et la liberté demeure l’idéal que chercheront toujours à réaliser les peuples qui sont dominés, écrasés et qui vivent dans la soumission absolue des impérialistes. Monsieur Robert Ménard, Secrétaire Général du RSF avec son pays la France, colonise le peuple kanak, guadeloupéens, guyanais, martiniquais, etc., qui demandent l’indépendance de leurs pays respectifs et leur liberté. Ces populations sont opprimées depuis plusieurs siècles.
Nul ne peut oublier l’assassinat odieux et ignoble des leaders nationalistes Jean-Marie Tjibaou, Eloi Machoro et de centaines de milliers des villageoises et villageois kanaks. En guise de preuves, voici le rappel de certains faits.
Primo : Les assassinats sommaires et les arrestations systématiques des différents leaders nationalistes des territoires et départements d’outre-mer, à l’instar de Jean-Marie Tjibaou, Eloi Machoro et tant d’autres.
Tjibaou était un homme politique non violent. Fils d'un chef de tribu et devenu leader nationaliste kanak, il est né en 1936 et assassiné à Ouvéa en 1989 par un tireur d’élite de la Gendarmerie française ; ce qui était un crime gratuit. Ordonné prêtre en 1965 à Ouvéa, il n’avait cessé, pourtant, de prôner la culture du dialogue et d’amitiés entre les peuples.
Le 5 décembre 1984, il avait payé très cher sa nomination à la tête du FLNKS (Front de Libération Nationale Kanak Socialiste). Lors de sa création, dix Kanak - parmi lesquels deux de ses frères qui roulaient dans la voiture qu'il aurait dû occuper - ont été assassinés par des colons européens dans une embuscade à Hienghène sur la route qui menait à ce congrès de FLNKS. Le RSF n’a jamais condamné ce massacre odieux.
Jean-Marie Tjibaou (Prêtre
Catholique non violent)
Par la suite, ce leader nationaliste a été assassiné le 4 mai 1989 avec Yeiwéné Yeiwéné, victime d’un complot ourdi par le pouvoir colonial français. Tjibaou était élu démocratiquement à plusieurs reprises par le peuple kanak dans différents postes publics.
Un autre leader politique nationaliste kanak, Eloi Machoro, qui avait été élu démocratiquement aux élections organisées par le pouvoir colonial, a été assassiné le 12 janvier 1985 près de Canala par des tireurs d’élite de la Gendarmerie française débarqués sur place spécialement pour tuer systématiquement les personnes qui demandaient la liberté et l’indépendance. Mais le RSF n’avait pas, non plus, dénoncé cet odieux crime barbare perpétré par la France
Le jour du massacre des Kanak, le Secrétaire Général du RSF, Mr Robert Menard, ce fameux «défenseur des droits de l’homme» et ses collaborateurs avaient défendu le colonialisme et l’impérialisme français contre les pauvres paysans kanak. Le silence de cette association avait placé une chape de plomb sur les libertés des peuples opprimés dans le monde. En outre, des centaines des Kanak croupissent dans les geôles françaises.
La seule faute et le seul grief des nationalistes guadeloupéens, kanak, guyanais et martiniquais ont été d’avoir revendiqué la liberté et l’indépendance de leurs pays qui sont devenus par la volonté des colonialistes, départements et territoires français d’outre-mer.
Les colonialistes n’ont pas honte, parce que les territoires et départements d’outre-mer demeurent une aberration qu’un homme épris de bon sens et de justice ne saurait admettre. En effet, comment peut-on annexer de force des pays entiers qui se situent dans des continents lointains (africain, américain, asiatique et océanique) et dont les peuples font montre de grandes différences culturelles avec le peuple français métropolitain ? Et pourquoi faire encore aujourd’hui la guerre contre ces peuples dans le but de les dominer et de les exploiter ?
Pour la presse occidentale ainsi que de nombreuses associations occidentales des droits de l’homme, la liberté est une réalité quand la France colonise les autres peuples contre leur volonté depuis des siècles. Ainsi, les dirigeants de l’association RSF se taisent et se voilent la face. Cependant, Mr Robert Menard se fâche et crie en public au scandale quand la Chine continue d’occuper le Tibet.
Secundo: L’Angleterre peut occuper et massacrer des milliers d’Argentins des îles Malouines situées à quatorze mille kilomètres de la Grande Bretagne sans émouvoir l’association RSF et ses dirigeants. De même, l’Espagne peut continuer de coloniser et de tuer des soldats et civils marocains dans le Détroit de Gibraltar en occupant une portion des terres marocaines (Ceuta et Melilla) sans que cela n’émeuve Mr Menard pour le condamner avec force.
En revanche, il s’insurge du fait de voir la Russie refuser la sécession de la Tchétchénie et demande des sanctions internationales contre elle.
Une autre situation tragique est celle de cette Palestine meurtrie. Lorsque les Palestiniens, assujettis à l’esclavage dans leur propre territoire, se lèvent contre leur oppression et exploitation éhontée du fait de la colonisation, par le feu et par le sang, de leur pays par Israël, Mr Menard et son association les condamnent avec la dernière énergie.
Tercio : Quand les Afrikaners, principalement d’origine hollandaise, française et anglo-saxonne, instaurent la politique de l’apartheid en Afrique du Sud, Mr Menard et son groupe préfèrent condamner les militants de l’ANC qui combattent leur assujettissement.
Il y a lieu de signaler que l’apartheid, en tant que système politique fondé sur la discrimination et la ségrégation raciales, est demeuré vivace en Afrique du Sud en dépit du fait que ce sont les Noirs qui y détiennent aujourd’hui le pouvoir. Les Afrikaners se comportent toujours en seigneurs sans que les associations occidentales des droits de l’homme ne critiquent, ni ne dénoncent cette politique.
En Cote d’Ivoire, l’armée française a commis des massacres, les hélicoptères d’attaque au sol et des blindés ont tiré, sans discontinuer, sur des foules, des civils non armés, et des légionnaires français ont tué plusieurs civils ivoiriens. Cela n’a pas ému Mr Robert Menard qui n’a pas condamné les forfaits de l’armée de son pays en terre étrangère.
En outre, le RSF ne dit rien sur le camp de concentration de Guantanamo, mais critique la Chine à propos du Tibet et demande au boycott des jeux olympiques.
Les peuples opprimés du monde ne constatent-ils pas qu’il y a une justice à deux vitesses, l’une - qui consacre l’impunité - pour les puissances impérialistes, notamment occidentales, et l’autre pour sévir avec la dernière énergie contre les peuples opprimés.
Pourquoi cette situation de deux poids et deux mesures ? Tout simplement parce que les anciens colonialistes sont de nouveau contre les nouveaux. Or, le colonialisme est un fléau et une barbarie que nous devons combattre avec la dernière énergie. Nul peuple ne peut être soumis en esclavage par un autre ; nul peuple ne peut être dominé et colonisé par un autre.
Nous devrons combattre tout système qui rétrograde les valeurs universelles de l’homme. Qu’il vienne de l’Occident, du Japon, de la Chine, de l’Inde ou du Brésil. Qu’il soit lion ou tigre, un fauve reste toujours dangereux pour l’homme. Il en est ainsi de l’impérialisme dont le colonialisme et le néocolonialisme constituent des avatars qui resteront toujours dangereux pour les opprimés.
Quarto: L’invasion militaire de l’Irak par les USA et la Grande-Bretagne a été suivie par des exécutions sommaires systématiques ayant causé des millions de morts ; ce qui est une barbarie sans commune mesure et sans précédent dans l’histoire de l’Irak.
Aucun organisme de la société civile ou association de défense des droits de l’homme n’a levé le petit doigt pour défendre les victimes irakiens, ni condamné la boucherie de plus de 2.000.000 des civils, mais l’association Human Rights Watch et la presse occidentale regrettent plus des 3.000 soldats américains envahisseurs de l’Irak qui sont morts dans le territoire d’un pays soumis en esclavage.
Camp de concentration de Guantanamo (Violation flagrante de droit
de l’homme, de nombreux prisonniers sont des innocents) / Guantanamo
est un territoire de la république Cubaine occupé par les américains par
la tricherie de l’ancien président Enzo Batista qui a cédé le territoire
pour 70.000 dollars.aux Américains
LES PRISONNIERS DONT BEAUCOUP D’INNONCENTS PIEDS
ET MAINS LIES (TRANSPORTES COMME DU BETAIL)
La presse soi-disant de liberté ne dit rien sur les massacres de 2.000.000 d’Irakiens tués par les bombardements chirurgicaux des avions et hélicoptères américains et alliés. Comment peut-on ignorer plus de deux millions (2.000.000) de morts irakiens et ne regretter que 3.000 militaires américains ? Comment peut-on ignorer plus d’un million des blessés irakiens, mais regretter seulement les quelques milliers de soldats américains blessés ? Pourquoi le RSF ne dit rien sur plus de 200.000 Irakiens emprisonnés en Irak et dans les prisons secrètes en Europe ?
Pourquoi le RSF ne dit rien sur la torture, les crimes de guerre, les crimes contre l’humanité que subissent les Irakiens par les occupants Américains et Britanniques en Irak ?
Allez vite vivre les réalités des tortures dans le site ci-après (www.syti.net/Kiosque/Kiosque_TortureUSA.html) pour constater les horreurs, comme les orgies ci-après.
LES CONDITIONS INHUMAINE IMPOSSIBLE D’ALLONGER
LES PIEDS, LES CONDITIONS QUE LES ASSOCIATIONS DE
DROIT DE L’HOMME NE CONDAMNE PAS
Les soldats de la démocratie américaine ont interdit
les Irakiens de faire la prière, ils les ont exigés de
Former une pyramide humaine humiliante
Dans le pays de l’Oncle Sam, l’Homme noir n’a jamais eu de place, mais en réalité, il demeure quotidiennement victime des interpellations et d’arrestations de faciès suivi des condamnations disproportionnées. La minorité noire vit un calvaire en Amérique. En outre, ils ne bénéficient d’aucune protection sociale et, sans ressources, beaucoup meurent de faim comme dans les pays du tiers-monde, mais motus et bouche cousue. Les emprisonnements systématiques et sommaires des Noirs américains pour les délits de faciès suivis des exécutions sommaires dans les chambres à gaz ou par injection.
Les soldats américains exigeants les Irakiens Croyants
de faire la fellation entre eux pendant la prière
Voici un exemple parmi des milliers d’autres : le cas du journaliste noir américain Mumia Abou Jamal. La vérité est que plusieurs de ces prisonniers noirs sont des innocents que les juges démocrates racistes condamnent sans preuve. Le journaliste noir américain Mumia Abou Jamal croupit depuis plusieurs années dans le couloir de la mort.
Le récit succinct de l’histoire de Mumia Abu-Jamal révèle qu’il est né le 24 avril 1954. A l’âge de 14 ans, il avait été arrêté et battu pour avoir protesté contre un meeting du candidat ultra-raciste George Wallace, à Philadelphie. Peu après, il a été fiché par le FBI pour avoir voulu rebaptiser son lycée du nom du grand dirigeant afro-américain “Malcolm X”. En 1969, le jeune homme était chargé de l’information à la section de Philadelphie du Black Panther Party (BPP).
Le FBI le considérait comme l’une des personnes “à surveiller et interner en cas d’alerte nationale”. Il était l’une des cibles du Cointelpro (programme d’infiltration et de contre-espionnage) dont ont été victimes Leonard Peltier et d’autres membres de l’Américan Indian Movement et des Black Panthers.
Devenu journaliste de radio apprécié et lauréat de plusieurs prix, Mumia est surnommé “la voix des sans-voix” pour sa critique de la corruption de la Police et des dirigeants politiques locaux. Depuis 1978, il dénonçait la violente répression qui frappait la communauté MOVE et, en 1981, il a suivi le procès de son fondateur, John Africa, qui a été acquitté des charges fabriquées contre lui. Le soutien de Mumia à MOVE a exaspéré les hommes politiques et la Police de Philadelphie et lui a valu le renvoi d’une des stations de radio où il était affecté.
Aussi, Mumia était-il contraint de travailler comme taximen de nuit pour faire vivre sa famille. Aux premières heures du 9 décembre 1981, Mumia Abu-Jamal a été grièvement blessé lors d’une fusillade dans le quartier sud de la ville où il est venu déposer un client. Arrêté, il est accusé du meurtre d’un policier, Daniel Faulkner, tué dans cette fusillade.
Malgré ses dénégations et l’absence d’antécédents judiciaires, une enquête inéquitable (expertises balistiques inexistantes, balles non identifiables, absence de relevé d’empreintes, zone des faits non sécurisée, tests non effectués, etc.) a conclu à la culpabilité de Mumia. Témoins menacés, subornés, écartés, rapports de police contradictoires, violations de ses droits, mèneront, en juillet 1982, à la condamnation à mort de cet opposant politique gênant sous la pression d’un juge recordman qui a exigé cette sentence. Mumia était, par la couleur de sa peau et son action militante, “le coupable idéal”.
MUMIA ABOU JAMAL
Néanmoins, un ancien tueur à gages, Arnold Beverly, a, en juin 1999, avoué à l’une des avocates de Mumia avoir tué l’officier Faulkner dans le cadre d’un contrat mêlant police et mafia. Corroborés par un faisceau d’éléments et de témoignages concordants, les aveux de Beverly n’ont jamais été entendus par la justice sur la base du prétexte qu’ils ont été fournis “hors des délais de la procédure”.
Vous pourrez lire la suite de ce triste histoire dans plusieurs langues sur le site des défenseurs de Mumia : (http://www.mumiabujamal.net).
Ni Mr Robert Menard du « Reporters sans Frontières », ni les autres journalistes propagandistes occidentaux n’ont levé le petit doigt pour condamner cette situation injuste d’Abou Jamal. Il sera bientôt exécuté. A Paris, on n’a jamais vu un seul membre de RSF dans des manifestations réclamant la libération de Mumia.
L’Etat d’Israël qui condamne la Chine contre les violations des droits de l’homme est un cas qui relève de la conscience et de l’inconscience humaine. Le peuple israélien, dont la nation juive constitue la principale composante, compte parmi ceux qui, avec les Noirs, ont le plus souffert des atrocités de la part des autres hommes sur notre planète.
Pour autant, au risque de se moquer du monde, on ne saurait occulter la vérité : Israël est le pays qui tue chaque jour, au moins, un enfant palestinien et qui arrête et emprisonne chaque jour, au moins, 5 civils palestiniens, D’ailleurs, les deux tiers de la population palestinienne –tous ceux qui vivent effectivement en Palestine et non, en Israël et dans d’autres pays étrangers - sont en prison en Israël et beaucoup y subissent des sévices en tous genres.
Alors, il faudrait que l’on évite de vivre dans un monde des rigolos et des mythomanes : les donneurs de leçons sont des Etats qui violent systématiquement les droits humains les plus élémentaires.
Quinto: les soldats britanniques continuent de massacrer les civils argentins dans les îles Malouines (Falkland en anglais, Islas Malvinas en espagnol), un archipel de l'Atlantique Sud situé à 480 km des côtes de l'Argentine, mais à 14.000 km de l’Angleterre. La barbarie des soldats de sa Majesté est flagrante : des arrestations sommaires suivies des exécutions d’Argentins sans que la presse occidentale ne les condamne d’une quelconque façon.
LES SOLDATS ARGENTINS PRISONNIERS DES
SOLDATS BRITANIQUES SUR LEUR PROPRE TERRE
Sexto : La situation des sans papiers dans « les démocraties occidentales » : Triste est de constater que les valeurs inaliénables de l’homme sont foulés au pied, des pères de familles ont perdus leur dignité et l’honneur, ils ont perdus aussi leurs noms pour être rebaptiser par des appellations sans papiers, comme les juifs dans les camps Nazi. Les couples mixtes sont séparés de force, les parents africains sont expulsés, les femmes blanches restent tristes et seules a élevés les enfants.
Selon les dirigeants occidentaux, leurs associations instrumentalisées et leur presse stipendiée, les emprisonnements massifs, systématiques et sommaires des citoyens des pays pauvres dans les prisons des pays d’Europe participent du respect des droits de l’homme. Le délit des Africains qui remplissent les geôles des pays européens est le fait de ne pas présenter des titres de séjour en règle. Ils sont le plus souvent condamnés à trois ou six mois, voire à deux ans de prison ferme alors que ces Africains n’ont jamais volé ou insulté une personne, par contre les européens sans titre de séjour valable se prélassent en Afrique comme des princes et des seigneurs.
Beaucoup d’Africains sont victimes des bavures de la part de certains policiers européens qui n’hésitent pas à déchirer leurs titres de séjour et autres papiers d’identité tout en établissant des PV sur la base d’allégations fallacieuses. Certains sont torturés par la police des pays d’Europe, on a dénombré de nombreux cas de morts en Belgique, en France, en Italie, en Espagne, etc.
UN ENFANT AFRICAIN SANS PAPIER MENACE
PAR LA POLICE FRANÇAISE. IL RISQUE 3 MOIS
DE PRISON SELON LA LOI FRANCAISE
DES « SANS-PAPIERS » AFRICAINS DANS LA PRISON
EN BELGIQUE POUR FAIRE RESPECTER LES DROITS
DE L’HOMME DANS L’UNION EUROPEENNE.
Septimo : L’invasion militaire de la République Démocratique du Congo par les armées rwandaise, ougandaise et burundaise, à l’instigation et sous la protection des puissances étrangères, notamment, les Etats-Unis d’Amérique, l’Angleterre et la Belgique. Ces pays ont financé et armé les armées d’agressions.
Mais, le pire est que les Congolais pleurent chaque jour environ cinq millions de morts. Par ailleurs, le viol systématique des femmes autochtones congolaises est utilisé par des Rwandais – forces gouvernementales et leurs opposants - comme arme de guerre à l’Est du Congo où l’on assiste aux expulsions forcées des populations autochtones de leurs terres et à l’intensification de l’exploitation illicite des minerais stratégiques tels que le coltan et la cassitérite par les envahisseurs. Les crimes contre l’humanité commis à l’Est du Congo par les seigneurs de guerre rwandais - tutsi et hutu confondus - comme Nkundabatware Mihigo sont bien connus de tous.
Mais, Nkundabatware et ses compatriotes ne sont pas arrêtés et les USA, l’Angleterre et la Belgique n’ont jamais condamné le génocide de cinq millions des Congolais. Les clichés photographiques suivants montrent à suffisance ce que sont les atrocités subies par les populations congolaises dans les territoires toujours occupés par des troupes rwandaises, toutes tendances – forces régulières et rebelles confondues.
Ces crimes sont perpétrés sur les instructions du général Paul Kagamé, Président de la République du Rwanda, un Etat africain mercenaire, s’il en est, et dont l’actuel chef - à l’instar de son homologue de l’Ouganda, Mr Museveni - a été préparé - dans une académie militaire aux Etats-Unis, plus précisement à Arkansas chez Bill Clinton - par les puissances impérialistes occidentales pour jouer un role maccabre en Afrique centrale.
Rares sont les défenseurs des droits de l’homme occidentaux qui aient condamné ce génocide des populations congolaises perpétré par le Rwanda de Kagame, l’Ouganda de Museveni et le Burundi de Buyoya. Nombreux sont, cependant en Occident, ceux qui n’ont osé levé le petit doigt pour protester contre les crimes de guerre, de génocide et contre l’humanité commis par ceux qui se présentent comme les fidèles alliés des pays occidentaux, notamment, des Etats-Unis d’Amérique, de la Grande Bretagne et de la Belgique.
Des responsables politiques occidentaux ainsi que des dirigeants des associations des droits de l’homme présentes en Occident, notamment Robert Menard, n’ont jamais dit un mot sur le génocide au Congo. Le paradoxe de l’histoire est très étonnant et absurde : le Ministre belge des Affaires étrangères, Mr Karl de Gucht, a même accusé les Congolais d’avoir commis ces massacres eux-mêmes et il n’a pas hésité à innocenter le Rwanda et l’Ouganda.
Toutefois, son cas relève simplement de l’esprit vindicatif du colonialiste belge qui a mal accepté et digéré l’indépendance du Congo. Cependant, la Cour Internationale de Justice (CIJ), basée à la Haye , en Hollande, avait déjà condamné l’Ouganda.
Néanmoins, le Ministre belge et de nombreuses associations occidentales des droits de l’homme font chaque jour la démonstration que la vie d’un Congolais ne vaut rien contre celle d’un Tibétain.
LES DEUX HOMMES ONT ORGANISES ET PLANIFIES L’EXTERMINATION
EN GRANDE ECHELLE DE LA POPULATION CONGOLAISE DE MULENGE
DE MAKOBOLA BREF LE GENOCIDE A L’EST DE LA RD CONGO
La moindre des conclusions démontre bien volontiers qu’il existe très peu d’associations des droits de l’homme dans le monde, mais beaucoup plus d’associations de malfaisance qui sont corrompues dans des pratiques qui relèvent de la pure escroquerie organisée contre les vraies victimes des violations des droits humains à travers la planète.
Paris, mercredi, 13 / 08 / 2008
Jean-Jacques Ngangweshe
@ :Jean-jacques-ngangweshe@live.fr
@ :jjngangweshe@yahoo.fr
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)
AS International
SurViVors SPEAK OUT - Rights of Victims Seeking Justice and Compensation for the RPF Genocide. This is an Exciting Collaborative Project launched by The AS International Founder Jean-Christophe Nizeyimana, Economist and Human Rights Activist. Join US and Be the First to know about the Mastermind of the Rwandan Genocide Still At large and enjoing Impunity.