Rwanda: Cartographie des crimes
Rwanda: cartographie des crimes du livre "In Praise of Blood, the crimes of the RPF" de Judi Rever
Kagame devra être livré aux Rwandais pour répondre à ses crimes: la meilleure option de réconciliation nationale entre les Hutus et les Tutsis.
Let us remember Our People
Let us remember our people, it is our right
You can't stop thinking
Don't you know
Rwandans are talkin' 'bout a revolution
It sounds like a whisper
The majority Hutus and interior Tutsi are gonna rise up
And get their share
SurViVors are gonna rise up
And take what's theirs.
We're the survivors, yes: the Hutu survivors!
Yes, we're the survivors, like Daniel out of the lions' den
(Hutu survivors) Survivors, survivors!
Get up, stand up, stand up for your rights
et up, stand up, don't give up the fight
“I’m never gonna hold you like I did / Or say I love you to the kids / You’re never gonna see it in my eyes / It’s not gonna hurt me when you cry / I’m not gonna miss you.”
The situation is undeniably hurtful but we can'stop thinking we’re heartbroken over the loss of our beloved ones.
"You can't separate peace from freedom because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom".
Malcolm X
Welcome to Home Truths
The year is 1994, the Fruitful year and the Start of a long epoch of the Rwandan RPF bloody dictatorship. Rwanda and DRC have become a unique arena and fertile ground for wars and lies. Tutsi RPF members deny Rights and Justice to the Hutu majority, to Interior Tutsis, to Congolese people, publicly claim the status of victim as the only SurViVors while millions of Hutu, interior Tutsi and Congolese people were butchered. Please make RPF criminals a Day One priority. Allow voices of the REAL victims to be heard.
Everybody Hurts
“Everybody Hurts” is one of the rare songs on this list that actually offers catharsis. It’s beautifully simple: you’re sad, but you’re not alone because “everybody hurts, everybody cries.” You’re human, in other words, and we all have our moments. So take R.E.M.’s advice, “take comfort in your friends,” blast this song, have yourself a good cry, and then move on. You’ll feel better, I promise.—Bonnie Stiernberg
KAGAME - GENOCIDAIRE
Paul Kagame admits ordering...
Paul Kagame admits ordering the 1994 assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana of Rwanda.
Why did Kagame this to me?
Inzira ndende
Search
Hutu Children & their Mums
Rwanda-rebranding
Rwanda-rebranding-Targeting dissidents inside and abroad, despite war crimes and repression
Rwanda has “A well primed PR machine”, and that this has been key in “persuading the key members of the international community that it has an exemplary constitution emphasizing democracy, power-sharing, and human rights which it fully respects”. It concluded: “The truth is, however, the opposite. What you see is not what you get: A FAÇADE”
Rwanda has hired several PR firms to work on deflecting criticism, and rebranding the country.
Targeting dissidents abroad
One of the more worrying aspects of Racepoint’s objectives
was to “Educate and correct the ill informed and factually
incorrect information perpetuated by certain groups of expatriates
and NGOs,” including, presumably, the critiques
of the crackdown on dissent among political opponents
overseas.
This should be seen in the context of accusations
that Rwanda has plotted to kill dissidents abroad. A
recent investigation by the Globe and Mail claims, “Rwandan
exiles in both South Africa and Belgium – speaking in clandestine meetings in secure locations because of their fears of attack – gave detailed accounts of being recruited to assassinate critics of President Kagame….
Ways To Get Rid of Kagame
How to proceed for revolution in Rwanda:
- The people should overthrow the Rwandan dictator (often put in place by foreign agencies) and throw him, along with his henchmen and family, out of the country – e.g., the Shah of Iran, Marcos of Philippines.Compaore of Burkina Faso
- Rwandans organize a violent revolution and have the dictator killed – e.g., Ceaucescu in Romania.
- Foreign powers (till then maintaining the dictator) force the dictator to exile without armed intervention – e.g. Mátyás Rákosi of Hungary was exiled by the Soviets to Kirgizia in 1970 to “seek medical attention”.
- Foreign powers march in and remove the dictator (whom they either instated or helped earlier) – e.g. Saddam Hussein of Iraq or Manuel Noriega of Panama.
- The dictator kills himself in an act of desperation – e.g., Hitler in 1945.
- The dictator is assassinated by people near him – e.g., Julius Caesar of Rome in 44 AD was stabbed by 60-70 people (only one wound was fatal though).
- Organise strikes and unrest to paralyze the country and convince even the army not to support the dictaor – e.g., Jorge Ubico y Castañeda was ousted in Guatemala in 1944 and Guatemala became democratic, Recedntly in Burkina Faso with the dictator Blaise Compaoré.
Almighty God :Justice for US
Killing Hutus on daily basis
RPF Trade Mark: Akandoya
Fighting For Our Freedom?
KAGAME VS JUSTICE
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
"In a dictatorship, one individual has managed to accumulate power and authority to the extent that he or she is the voice and will of the government and, therefore, the people. Dictators are sometimes called totalitarians because all political life is centered on a single individual. The totality of everything the government does revolves around the dictator.
A dictator’s source of power is almost always fear, usually engendered by a loyal paramilitary force that keeps political opponents and uprisings in check. All government officials serve at the will of the dictator. If there is a hint of disloyalty, these people are routinely removed from their positions and, in many instances, executed. Totalitarian economies are almost uniformly command and control economies. Some free market activities exist, but nothing is free from the grasp of the dictator. The structures and functions of government can be altered in any way the dictator pleases. The only redeeming aspect of a totalitarian regime is that it might be slightly better than outright anarchy".
My Predictions of what is likely to happen in Rwanda’s politics
by Jean Paul Ndindamahina, 27 May 2015
by Jean Paul Ndindamahina, 27 May 2015
Kigali Rwanda - It can be very difficult to imagine what would happen when a leader who is like the glue that sticks people and institutions together departs from power or remain on power illegally. The president of Rwanda, alike Rwanda’s former leader Habyarimana, is considered to be capable and a warrior. He is feared by his people and whatever he orders; it is quickly done without questioning. As a former guerrilla commander; He is a man with authority indeed. He does not repeat himself, he is a result oriented president and his passion is to see things being done the way he would like it. For some Rwandans, he is hush and a man with absolute authority and for other Rwandans he is just a warrior, a president who fought wars and liberates the country and revenge for his people and to later to become a man who he is today and a man who holds a key of peace in his hands.
There are a number of Rwandans who fear what tomorrow will bring for Rwanda and many of these Rwandans feel too much will occur if president departs from political office. As ideology goes some Rwandans try to think positive (naïve) hence their campaign for him to keep being the glue that holds them together and others like me, feel that time has come for Rwanda to start building strong institutions are not build on individualism ideology but on sense of nationhood and pride but under one party system, the constitution is going to be amended to allow one man to contest for a third time and keep playing the role to stick people and institutions together and most importantly Rwanda’s current political coalition.
The following are likelihood if the plan to change and amend the constitution goes ahead.
1.Parliamentarian game
This game has already started. Using the ministry of local government, vulnerable Rwanda citizens are contacted and are forced to sign their petitions to demand Kagame’s third term in office. These petitions are then bundled together and brought back to the parliament building and public ceremony is held as a propaganda to show the entire world that in fact, the people of Rwanda want president Kagame to keep his office for a third term.
There is a hint that the parliament is going to look at those petition from people who want Kagame to stay and those who don’t want third term( Only one man Frank, managed to reach parliament building with his against petition but there was no ceremony ) in June 2015 and the likelihood is that the parliament may not decide in June, it may choose to keep stocking their forged people’s petition for a third term until the same people are manipulated to occupy Rwandan streets demanding Kagame’s third term. Forcing people to go into street and demand Kagame’s leadership, is going to be a game that takes off any shame in the face of those who will make decision to change the constitution in its article 101 that currently allows two presidential term limits.
The reason number one that make most Rwandans feel Rwanda is not their home under a certain leadership like RPF led government is that the parliament does not take charge of Rwanda, it is full of individuals who are salary driven and being nominated by their political party and not directly voted by the people, it is impossible that Rwanda’s members of parliament would create a country that any Rwanda can call his or her home hence these so called member of parliament , don’t consider it to be a shame and a betrayal to a country when trying to manipulate the country and her people because they were given a ticket to a parliamentary seat ; not by the people and country but by the president himself who nominates them under their political party.
2.The political game from Political parties in coalition with RPF
We all know that the only political party that exists in Rwanda is green party and we already know that the president of green party Frank Habineza has refused to support the third term in office for the President. Most political parties in coalition fear that if Paul Kagame is to step down as the constitution states in its article 101; then it is without a doubt that the current existence of political coalition will cease to exists and those so called political opposition leaders don’t imagine to operate under a such extreme political environment hence they would support one man who is considered to be the glue that holds them together to keep his office.
Some members in these political oppositions in coalition with RPF may not agree to idea and these political parties would ensure that those who are on their head are President Kagame’s married wives who would convince and if not consent their political members to agree to a third term for president Kagame and we have already started seeing some Rwanda’s opposition parties reshuffling their leadership with PSD the second Rwanda’s largest party removing Dr Ntawukuriryayo as a leader of that party replacing him with DR Biruta, a long term best friend of President Kagame. This reshuffle in opposition parties who are in coalition with RPF ensures silence should the Rwandan constitution to lift presidential terms in office is changed.
3.President Kagame’s own game
President Kagame is the best when it comes to his own political game. He is a man who is capable to hide himself behind humbleness but definitely, he is a man who knows what he wants and who can take advantages if necessary. His recent conference with journalist, he was asked of what he thinks about the ongoing campaign for him to stay in office and he explained two thoughts of school and he said he was with those who say, he should respect the constitution and later, he said he was open for a third term!
So the game is even the constitution is changed to allow him to run for a third term, President Kagame is likely to refuse to straight away go and say , I am now running for a third term in office in fear of causing chaos and international outrage but instead, he will let another person context for a president. Whoever will contest for a president other than President Kagame is likely to fail, 2, 3 or 4 years later; president Kagame would resume his office as usual because legally, he would not be barred from being a president an after he becomes once again the president, he would be for life.
As conclusion, I urge all Rwandan leaders to show due respect to our constitution and respect the right of every Rwandans to follow a political party of their choices. All members of parliament to be directly voted by the people not their political parties. Allow all political changes to take place because the mistake would be to prevent an unavoidable change from taking place.
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Friday, May 22, 2015
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus)and mass arrests of Hutus by the RPF criminal organization =>AS International]
US
CONGRESS TO HOLD HEARING ON RWANDA'S TROUBLING HUMAN RIGHTS RECORD
WASHINGTON, May 14, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- The House Foreign
Affairs Subcommittee on Africa, Global
Health, Global Human Rights and International Organizations announced today
that it will hold a hearing on May 20 to examine Rwanda's deteriorating human rights
record under President Paul
Kagame.
The hearing, "Developments in Rwanda,"
will feature testimony from several experts on Rwanda including David Himbara, a
former top economic aide to President Kagame and coordinator of the North
American branch of Democracy in Rwanda Now (DIRN); Robert Higiro, a former
Rwandan army major who fled the country when he was ordered to assassinate
Rwandan dissidents living in South Africa; and Robert Jackson, Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary in the US Department of State's Bureau of African
Affairs.
"I highly commend Chairman Christopher Smith (R-NJ) and Ranking Member Karen Bass
(D-CA) for holding this very important hearing, which will shine a brighter
spotlight on Rwanda's troubling and worsening human
rights record," said Mr. Himbara.
"I sincerely hope that this
hearing, in addition to raising awareness among members of Congress and the
American people about President Kagame's repressive regime, serves as a
critical step toward ending the troubling, long-established authoritarian governance
of Rwanda. The Rwandan
people deserve to live in a country of opportunity and freedom, not one of
tyranny and fear."
In recent years, President Kagame has
taken deliberate steps to control Rwandan media, silence all opposition and
quiet those who criticize his regime, as evidenced in Human Rights Watch's
World Report 2015. The US State Department has condemned these actions, with
spokesperson Jen
Psaki noting
in a Jan. 16, 2014, press briefing that the
United States is
"troubled by the succession of what appear to be politically motivated
murders of prominent Rwandan exiles."
Many Rwandan opposition activists have
disappeared or died under mysterious circumstances; the State Department's 2013
Country Report on Human Rights Practices states that Rwanda has "major human rights
problems," including "arbitrary or unlawful killings both inside and
outside of the country, disappearances, torture, harsh conditions in prisons
and detention centers, arbitrary arrests, prolonged pretrial detentions and
government infringement on citizens' privacy rights."
Democracy in Rwanda Now (DIRN) is a non-profit,
non-governmental organization that promotes democracy, free speech and human
rights for Rwandans.
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Monday, May 18, 2015
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus)and mass arrests of Hutus by the RPF criminal organization =>AS International]
Les Présidents Sarkosy et Hollande ont contribué à l'humiliation de la France et de ses soldats, Chose inacceptable.
Un général crie justice. Alors que la France est de nouveau plongée dans les tourments africains, l’homme qui commanda le détachement français de l’opération Turquoise au Rwanda en 1994 pose de bonnes et cruelles questions. Son témoignage est davantage qu’un plaidoyer. Accusée d’avoir couvert et même participé au génocide, l’armée française n’a pas à rougir de son intervention. Mieux, elle a sauvé des dizaines de milliers d’hommes, et si elle doit se plaindre, c’est moins d’être odieusement salie, que trahie par les autorités de l’État français qui non seulement ne défendent pas l’honneur de nos soldats, mais n’ont pas su faire preuve du courage et de la cohérence nécessaires pour neutraliser la folie meurtrière qui a ensanglanté le Rwanda.
Didier Tauzin raconte, explique, argumente. Mieux, il met les faits en perspective : on comprend pourquoi la tragédie rwandaise s’est inscrite dans le racisme ordinaire qui a tissé douloureusement les rapports humains dans la région depuis les temps les plus reculés. Pourtant, ce n’est toujours pas une banalité de parler aujourd’hui de la domination de maîtres à esclaves de la minorité tutsie sur la majorité hutue, comme si on pouvait exorciser le spectre du fascisme ethnique en taisant ses propres lâchetés. Faute d’avoir pris la mesure de cette pesanteur historique, la « démocratie arithmétique » issue de la décolonisation a réveillé les vieux démons.
Didier Tauzin raconte, explique, argumente. Mieux, il met les faits en perspective : on comprend pourquoi la tragédie rwandaise s’est inscrite dans le racisme ordinaire qui a tissé douloureusement les rapports humains dans la région depuis les temps les plus reculés. Pourtant, ce n’est toujours pas une banalité de parler aujourd’hui de la domination de maîtres à esclaves de la minorité tutsie sur la majorité hutue, comme si on pouvait exorciser le spectre du fascisme ethnique en taisant ses propres lâchetés. Faute d’avoir pris la mesure de cette pesanteur historique, la « démocratie arithmétique » issue de la décolonisation a réveillé les vieux démons.
Le général ne craint d’ailleurs pas, citant Bernanos, de parler du délire diabolique qui s’est emparée des Rwandais, toutes ethnies confondues, pour méditer sur la complicité des hommes avec les forces du mal. Et s’il fallait un seul exemple pour mesurer la douleur du soldat, c’est le sacrifice de ce jeune prêtre catholique hutu venu dire une messe grâce à lui dans le camp de réfugiés tutsis de Nyarushishi, et retrouvé peu après assassiné, sans doute par les siens.
Les complices du massacre, conscients ou non, Didier Tauzin les connaît. Si son livre est un cri du cœur, un cri de souffrance et d’indignation qui ne balance pas dans la nuance, parfois avec maladresse, s’il s’en prend directement aux journalistes qui n’hésitèrent pas à faire le jeu de l’ennemi, le récit est plus subtil dans l’analyse des ressorts de la guerre subversive moderne qui s’est déployée autour du Rwanda.
Avec soixante-dix hommes, en 1993, Tauzin a tenu en échec les troupes du FPR de Kagamé. Le feu vert de Paris, et la contre-offensive préparée par le colonel et ses marsouins du 1er RPIMa, aidés par les artilleurs-parachutistes du 35e RAP, rétablissait les conditions d’une paix durable. L’ordre ne vint pas, la France préféra céder aux sirènes d’une politique étrangère pétrie de bons sentiments (le processus d’Arusha ), mais dont il fallut payer le prix fort un an plus tard.
La guerre est toujours une épreuve de vérité , écrit le général Tauzin. Avec ce disciple de Lyautey, on se dit que le destin de la France (il parle, lui, de vocation) se joue peut-être en Afrique.
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Tuesday, May 12, 2015
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus)and mass arrests of Hutus by the RPF criminal organization =>AS International]
It accuses Rwandan, Ugandan and Burundian forces of participating in the attacks, and recommends that the international community seeks to prosecute those responsible.
The document's publication prompted angry denials from all the countries.
But the Congolese government said the report was credible and heartbreaking.
"The victims deserve justice and they deserve that their voices are heard by my government and by the international community," its UN representative, Ileka Atoki, said in a statement.
DR Congo was "appalled at the horrific nature and scope" of the crimes documented in the report, he added.
However, the government said the information in the document was not new and that a previous request by DR Congo President Joseph Kabila to establish an international criminal tribunal had been ignored by the UN.
It also made no specific comment on the allegations of genocide.
'More nuanced language'
The Mapping Report documenting the most serious violations international humanitarian law committed within DR Congo between 1993 and 2003 details crimes never previously documented.
It covers 617 incidents and includes allegations of massacres of civilians, torture, and the destruction of infrastructure that led to civilian deaths.
The report says several incidents in 1996 and 1997 pointed to "circumstances and facts from which a court could infer the intention to destroy the Hutu ethnic group in the DRC in part".
"The extensive use of edged weapons... and the apparently systematic nature of the massacres of survivors after the camps had been taken suggests that the numerous deaths cannot be attributed to the hazards of war or seen as equating to collateral damage."
Rwanda's government has always said its troops entered DR Congo to pursue the militiamen responsible for the 1994 genocide of Tutsis.
But the report says a very high number of Hutu civilians were shot, raped, burnt or beaten, and the attacks took place after refugees had allegedly been screened by the Rwandan army (APR) and the Congolese rebel movement it supported, the Alliance of Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Congo (AFDL).
"The apparent systematic and widespread attacks described in this report reveal a number of inculpatory elements that, if proven before a competent court, could be characterized as crimes of genocide," it concludes.
In one incident cited in the report, AFDL/APR units allegedly killed around 500 refugees at the bridge over the Ulindi river at Shabunda in February 1997.
After the massacre, it says, villagers were made to dump the bodies in the river and clean the bridge. The soldiers allegedly then forcefully led away the survivors and executed them the following day.
The report calls for a full judicial investigation to take place to determine whether these "incidents amount to the crime of genocide".
The BBC's Mark Doyle says the draft report spoke of "damning" reports of "systematic and widespread attacks" which, if proven in court, "could be classified as crimes of genocide".The final version is more nuanced, speaking of "apparent" attacks, which "could be characterised as crimes of genocide", our correspondents says.The UN said the language was not changed because of pressure from the countries accused of atrocities, and that UN lawyers always reviewed important reports, he adds.
The BBC's Mark Doyle says the draft report spoke of "damning" reports of "systematic and widespread attacks" which, if proven in court, "could be classified as crimes of genocide".The final version is more nuanced, speaking of "apparent" attacks, which "could be characterised as crimes of genocide", our correspondents says.The UN said the language was not changed because of pressure from the countries accused of atrocities, and that UN lawyers always reviewed important reports, he adds.
'Rewriting history'
Despite the changes, Rwanda categorically rejected the report.
DR Congo and Rwanda: Troublesome neighbours
DR Congo and Rwanda: Troublesome neighbours
"The desire to validate the double genocide theory is consistently present throughout the draft Mapping Report by mirror-imaging the actors, ideology, and methods employed during the 1994 Rwandan genocide," a government statement said.
Correspondents says the charge of genocide is particularly sensitive for the government of Rwanda's President Paul Kagame who portrays himself as the man who ended the genocide of his Tutsi people.Rwandan Foreign Affairs Minister Louise Mushikiwabo said the document remained "flawed and dangerous from start to finish".She criticised the methodology used to collect evidence and accused the UN of seeking to rewrite history.
Correspondents says the charge of genocide is particularly sensitive for the government of Rwanda's President Paul Kagame who portrays himself as the man who ended the genocide of his Tutsi people.Rwandan Foreign Affairs Minister Louise Mushikiwabo said the document remained "flawed and dangerous from start to finish".She criticised the methodology used to collect evidence and accused the UN of seeking to rewrite history.
President Kagame threatened to withdraw Rwandan troops from UN peacekeeping operation in response to the draft report. He was only persuaded not to after Rwanda would be allowed to submit comments for inclusion.
Uganda, which had also threatened to pull out of peacekeeping missions, said the report was not well-considered or objective.
Burundi also rejected the conclusions, saying they were "clearly aimed at destabilising the region".
The east of DR Congo is still plagued by army and militia violence despite the end of the country's five-year war in 2003 in which more than five million people lost their lives - the deadliest conflict since World War II.
The Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more potent than ever, and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a "time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Monday, March 30, 2015
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, tyranny and corruption in Rwanda. The current government has been characterized by the total impunity of RPF criminals, the Tutsi economic monopoly, the Tutsi militaristic domination, and the brutal suppression of the rights of the majority of the Rwandan people (85% are Hutus)and mass arrests of Hutus by the RPF criminal organization =>AS International]
Kinshasa, 06/03/2015 / Politique
Les Fardc sont en train de remplir leur part du contrat dans la lutte contre les groupes étrangers qui écument l’Est de la Rdc.
Aucun succès militaire en lui tout seul ne débouchera, cependant, sur une solution durable de la question complexe des FDLR qui ont passé vingt ans à l’Est de la Rdc. Il faut passer à l’étape politique. La traque est une solution militaire, donc la guerre.
Or c’est connu, toutes les guerres se terminent toujours autour d’une table où se retrouvent les belligérants pour passer à l’angle politique. C’est cela le dialogue politique. Or, la guerre contre les FDLR ne se terminera pas sur un dialogue politique. Rien n’est prévu à ce sujet.
Après, ce sera alors le vide. A supposer que tous les 2.000 ou 3.000 combattants FDLR soient fait prisonniers, seraient-ils remis au CICR comme prisonniers de guerre. Et la suite alors ? C’est là le but du dialogue politique sans lequel la solution définitive est chimérique.
Le leadership politique des FDLR est favorable à un dialogue avec leur pays, le Rwanda. Ils ne cessent de l’exiger à tue-tête même pendant les opérations militaires de traque des Fardc. Mais, Kigali ne veut rien entendre. Rien du tout.
L’équation devient compliquée
Le Rwanda a même entrainé la Communauté internationale dans sa cécité et a obtenu que celle-ci rejette tout dialogue avec les FDLR. Ce qui complique toute l’équation. Le blocage s’appelle donc Paul Kagame. Si ce dernier avait négocié avec les FDLR, il y a belle lurette que ceux-ci auraient quitté la Rdc.
L’argument avancé ne tient pas du tout la route. On ne comprend pas comment la Communauté internationale s’est fait prendre au piège du pouvoir rwandais. Car, tous les Hutu-FDLR ne sont pas du tout des génocidaires. Il y a même parmi eux des enfants nés après 1994 en Rdc. Ces enfants qui ne connaissent rien du génocide de 94.
Kagame a dit que ces Hutu nés en Rdc sont des génocidaires du fait de leur sang. Et on laisse passer des inepties. Il y a un principe de droit qui dit que l’infraction est individuelle. On ne peut donc faire endosser à un enfant des crimes supposés commis par ses parents. Or, c’est ce qu’on fait au Rwanda.
D’où, le refus total de négocier avec les FDLR considérées tous comme des génocidaires. Le problème s’appelle Kagame. Il faut que la Communauté internationale revienne à la raison et impose au Rwanda un dialogue avec le leadership des FDLR.
Poursuivre ceux qui sont impliqués dans le génocide
Kigali aura l’occasion de poursuivre ceux qui sont impliqués dans le génocide. Il faut avoir le courage de jeter une passerelle pour discuter avec ses compatriotes. C’est ce qu’exigent Pretoria et Dar-es Salam. La même Communauté internationale l’a imposé à la Rdc alors que la population n’en voulait. Alors que le M23 était vaincu militairement par les Fardc et la Monusco, la Communauté internationale a imposé un dialogue politique qui a débouché sur la Déclaration de Nairobi.
En 1998, le Rwanda et l’Ouganda ont occupé la Rdc par leurs armées et ont créé des rébellions sous leur botte, le RDC/Goma, le RCD/K-ML, le Mlc etc. Au bout d’un processus des négociations entre belligérants imposé par la Communauté internationale, les parties ont signé un Accord de paix à Lusaka, en 1999.
Malgré cela, la guerre a continué pendant 5 ans et un autre processus des négociations en Afrique du Sud qui a débouché sur le partage du pouvoir entre les anciens rebelles et le pouvoir constitué de Kinshasa. En 2008, le Rwanda crée encore une autre rébellion des Tutsi au Nord-Kivu sous la dénomination du CNDP. Après la guerre, il y a eu des négociations de Goma, de 2009 entre Kinshasa et ces anciens rebelles pro-rwandais qui ont accouché d’un Accord politique.
Il n’y a qu’à la Rdc où on impose des dialogues politiques même lorsque les Fardc sont en position de force sur le terrain militaire. Au Rwanda, rien du tout. Même pas avec son opposition politique en exil.
Kandolo M./Forum des As
Aucun succès militaire en lui tout seul ne débouchera, cependant, sur une solution durable de la question complexe des FDLR qui ont passé vingt ans à l’Est de la Rdc. Il faut passer à l’étape politique. La traque est une solution militaire, donc la guerre.
Or c’est connu, toutes les guerres se terminent toujours autour d’une table où se retrouvent les belligérants pour passer à l’angle politique. C’est cela le dialogue politique. Or, la guerre contre les FDLR ne se terminera pas sur un dialogue politique. Rien n’est prévu à ce sujet.
Après, ce sera alors le vide. A supposer que tous les 2.000 ou 3.000 combattants FDLR soient fait prisonniers, seraient-ils remis au CICR comme prisonniers de guerre. Et la suite alors ? C’est là le but du dialogue politique sans lequel la solution définitive est chimérique.
Le leadership politique des FDLR est favorable à un dialogue avec leur pays, le Rwanda. Ils ne cessent de l’exiger à tue-tête même pendant les opérations militaires de traque des Fardc. Mais, Kigali ne veut rien entendre. Rien du tout.
L’équation devient compliquée
Le Rwanda a même entrainé la Communauté internationale dans sa cécité et a obtenu que celle-ci rejette tout dialogue avec les FDLR. Ce qui complique toute l’équation. Le blocage s’appelle donc Paul Kagame. Si ce dernier avait négocié avec les FDLR, il y a belle lurette que ceux-ci auraient quitté la Rdc.
L’argument avancé ne tient pas du tout la route. On ne comprend pas comment la Communauté internationale s’est fait prendre au piège du pouvoir rwandais. Car, tous les Hutu-FDLR ne sont pas du tout des génocidaires. Il y a même parmi eux des enfants nés après 1994 en Rdc. Ces enfants qui ne connaissent rien du génocide de 94.
Kagame a dit que ces Hutu nés en Rdc sont des génocidaires du fait de leur sang. Et on laisse passer des inepties. Il y a un principe de droit qui dit que l’infraction est individuelle. On ne peut donc faire endosser à un enfant des crimes supposés commis par ses parents. Or, c’est ce qu’on fait au Rwanda.
D’où, le refus total de négocier avec les FDLR considérées tous comme des génocidaires. Le problème s’appelle Kagame. Il faut que la Communauté internationale revienne à la raison et impose au Rwanda un dialogue avec le leadership des FDLR.
Poursuivre ceux qui sont impliqués dans le génocide
Kigali aura l’occasion de poursuivre ceux qui sont impliqués dans le génocide. Il faut avoir le courage de jeter une passerelle pour discuter avec ses compatriotes. C’est ce qu’exigent Pretoria et Dar-es Salam. La même Communauté internationale l’a imposé à la Rdc alors que la population n’en voulait. Alors que le M23 était vaincu militairement par les Fardc et la Monusco, la Communauté internationale a imposé un dialogue politique qui a débouché sur la Déclaration de Nairobi.
En 1998, le Rwanda et l’Ouganda ont occupé la Rdc par leurs armées et ont créé des rébellions sous leur botte, le RDC/Goma, le RCD/K-ML, le Mlc etc. Au bout d’un processus des négociations entre belligérants imposé par la Communauté internationale, les parties ont signé un Accord de paix à Lusaka, en 1999.
Malgré cela, la guerre a continué pendant 5 ans et un autre processus des négociations en Afrique du Sud qui a débouché sur le partage du pouvoir entre les anciens rebelles et le pouvoir constitué de Kinshasa. En 2008, le Rwanda crée encore une autre rébellion des Tutsi au Nord-Kivu sous la dénomination du CNDP. Après la guerre, il y a eu des négociations de Goma, de 2009 entre Kinshasa et ces anciens rebelles pro-rwandais qui ont accouché d’un Accord politique.
Il n’y a qu’à la Rdc où on impose des dialogues politiques même lorsque les Fardc sont en position de force sur le terrain militaire. Au Rwanda, rien du tout. Même pas avec son opposition politique en exil.
Kandolo M./Forum des As
Lu et Dispatché par:
Godé Chiri Haguma
Criminologue et Economiste
Représentant-Speaker des Victimes Congolaises
Réfugiées à Arizona, Phoenix / USA.
E-mail: hagumachiri@hotmail.com
Criminologue et Economiste
Représentant-Speaker des Victimes Congolaises
Réfugiées à Arizona, Phoenix / USA.
E-mail: hagumachiri@hotmail.com
Skype: Gode.Chiri
A propos du pourchasse des FDLR à l'Est de la RDC, je l'avais bien dit à la Radio la Voix d'Amérique en Français que c'était une affaire compliquée si le Rwanda Pays d'origine des membres du FDLR n'accepte pas des négociations. J'avais écris que rien ne se fera dans le dossier de chasser FDLR sur le Territoire du Congo-Kinshasa si, la RDC ne fait médiatiquement et diplomatiquement aucun effort pour que le Rwanda accepte de négocier avec les FDLR comme le Président actuel de la Tanzanie l'avait proposé à ADDIS-ABEBA dans une réunion regroupant presque tous les Présidents Africains et par après l'idée a été boycottée par Paul Kagamé / Président actuel en exercice du Rwanda. Le FDLR est né officiellement au Congo - Zaïre donc c'est au Gouvernement Congolais de trouver la solution. Le Rwanda n'a pas plus des diplomates que la RDC à l'extérieur pour persuader et expliquer le monde la cause de la non négociation par le Rwanda sur l'affaire FDLR comme si les Congolais ne savent pas expliquer au monde la source et la cause des conflits au Congo-Zaïre? Quand je suis arrivé aux USA en 2005 plus précisément dans l'Etat d'Arizona, j'ai rencontré tout le monde était déjà convaincu intoxiqué par ceux-là qui font ce qu'ils font au Congo de Lumumba (enlèvement, viol ,mutilation des sexes des femmes Congolaises, castrer les hommes, tuerie, enterrer les femmes vivantes, brûler les femmes et les enfants etc) que tous les Congolais étaient mauvais qu'ils ne veulent pas vivre avec les autres que c'était ça la cause des conflits meurtriers en RDC. Mais hélas, étant victime et rescapé des enlèvements et emprisonnement arbitraire de Goma 1996-1997 et de massacre de Kisangani en Juin 2000 pendant l'affrontement des militaires du Rwanda et de l'Ouganda, je me suis décidé de faire des conférences vérités pour expliquer sur quoi était basé les conflits en RDC et qui étaient les acteurs car les émissaires des ennemis de la RDC circulaient convaincre le monde entier que les conflits en RDC étaient entre les Congolais eux-mêmes en utilisant le terme "Conflit en RDC est Congolo-Congolo" mais, petit à petit beaucoup cet Etat sont parvenu à comprendre la signification de ces différentes et successives guerres en RDC. La RDC a besoin que ceux qui connaissent la vérité sur la misère qui domine ce Pays et agace sa population parlent. Faisons tous de même partout ou nous sommes pour sauver la RDC, Pays de nos ancêtres. A suivre
Godé Chiri Haguma
The
Truth can be buried and stomped into the ground where none can see, yet
eventually it will, like a seed, break through the surface once again far more
potent than ever and Nothing can stop it. Truth can be suppressed for a
"time", yet It cannot be destroyed. ==> Wolverine
Subscribe to:
Posts
(Atom)
Profile
I am Jean-Christophe Nizeyimana, an Economist, Content Manager, and EDI Expert, driven by a passion for human rights activism. With a deep commitment to advancing human rights in Africa, particularly in the Great Lakes region, I established this blog following firsthand experiences with human rights violations in Rwanda and in the DRC (formerly Zaïre) as well. My journey began with collaborations with Amnesty International in Utrecht, the Netherlands, and with human rights organizations including Human Rights Watch and a conference in Helsinki, Finland, where I was a panelist with other activists from various countries.
My mission is to uncover the untold truth about the ongoing genocide in Rwanda and the DRC. As a dedicated voice for the voiceless, I strive to raise awareness about the tragic consequences of these events and work tirelessly to bring an end to the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF)'s impunity.
This blog is a platform for Truth and Justice, not a space for hate. I am vigilant against hate speech or ignorant comments, moderating all discussions to ensure a respectful and informed dialogue at African Survivors International Blog.
Genocide masterminded by RPF
Finally the well-known Truth Comes Out.
After suffering THE LONG years, telling the world that Kagame and his RPF criminal organization masterminded the Rwandan genocide that they later recalled Genocide against Tutsis. Our lives were nothing but suffering these last 32 years beginning from October 1st, 1990 onwards. We are calling the United States of America, United Kingdom, Japan, and Great Britain in particular, France, Belgium, Netherlands and Germany to return to hidden classified archives and support Honorable Tito Rutaremara's recent statement about What really happened in Rwanda before, during and after 1994 across the country and how methodically the Rwandan Genocide has been masterminded by Paul Kagame, the Rwandan Hitler. Above all, Mr. Tito Rutaremara, one of the RPF leaders has given details about RPF infiltration methods in Habyarimana's all instances, how assassinations, disappearances, mass-slaughters across Rwanda have been carried out from the local autority to the government,fabricated lies that have been used by Gacaca courts as weapon, the ICTR in which RPF had infiltrators like Joseph Ngarambe, an International court biased judgments & condemnations targeting Hutu ethnic members in contraversal strategy compared to the ICTR establishment to pursue in justice those accountable for crimes between 1993 to 2003 and Mapping Report ignored and classified to protect the Rwandan Nazis under the RPF embrella . NOTHING LASTS FOREVER.
Human and Civil Rights
Human Rights, Mutual Respect and Dignity
For all Rwandans :
Hutus - Tutsis - Twas
Rwanda: A mapping of crimes
Rwanda: A mapping of crimes in the book "In Praise of Blood, the crimes of the RPF by Judi Rever
Be the last to know: This video talks about unspeakable Kagame's crimes committed against Hutu, before, during and after the genocide against Tutsi in Rwanda.
The mastermind of both genocide is still at large: Paul Kagame
KIBEHO: Rwandan Auschwitz
Kibeho Concetration Camp.
Mass murderers C. Sankara
Stephen Sackur’s Hard Talk.
Prof. Allan C. Stam
The Unstoppable Truth
Prof. Christian Davenport
The Unstoppable Truth
Prof. Christian Davenport Michigan University & Faculty Associate at the Center for Political Studies
The killing Fields - Part 1
The Unstoppable Truth
The killing Fields - Part II
The Unstoppable Truth
Daily bread for Rwandans
The Unstoppable Truth
The killing Fields - Part III
The Unstoppable Truth
Time has come: Regime change
Drame rwandais- justice impartiale
Carla Del Ponte, Ancien Procureur au TPIR:"Le drame rwandais mérite une justice impartiale" - et réponse de Gerald Gahima
Sheltering 2,5 million refugees
Credible reports camps sheltering 2,500 million refugees in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo have been destroyed.
The UN refugee agency says it has credible reports camps sheltering 2,5 milion refugees in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo have been destroyed.
Latest videos
Peter Erlinder comments on the BBC documentary "Rwanda's Untold Story
Madam Victoire Ingabire,THE RWANDAN AUNG SAN SUU KYI
Rwanda's Untold Story
Rwanda, un génocide en questions
Bernard Lugan présente "Rwanda, un génocide en... par BernardLugan Bernard Lugan présente "Rwanda, un génocide en questions"
Nombre de Visiteurs
Pages
- Donate - Support us
- 1994 MASSACRES IN RWANDA WERE NOT GENOCIDE ACCOR...
- Les massacres du Rwanda 20 plus tard. À la recherc...
- About African survivors International
- Congo Genocide
- Twenty Years Ago, The US was Behind the Genocide: Rwanda, Installing a US Proxy State in Central Africa
- Rwanda Genocide
- Our work
Popular Posts - Last 7 days
-
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand,...
-
Contacts:: Kitty Kurth, Hotel Rwanda Rusesabagina Foundation 312-617-7288 Friends of the Congo 202-584-6512 Africa Faith and Justice N...
-
By Jean-Christophe Nizeyimana, The Truth-Telle r [Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the...
-
Tension entre militaires burundais et rwandais à la frontière nord Twenty years after the pivotal events of 1994 , it is time ...
-
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, ty...
-
Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) To the personal attention of the Prosecutor Ocampo Post Off...
-
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying reality : the Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination , the Tutsi minority ethn...
-
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying reality : the Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule, ty...
-
The blog of African Survivors International is like a library or a public park where we can all go to think, learn and g...
-
03-01-2010 posted by Ann Garrison Harsh anti-gay legislation proposed in both Uganda and Rwanda has turned more Western attention to E...
Archives
Everything happens for a reason
Bad things are going to happen in your life, people will hurt you, disrespect you, play with your feelings.. But you shouldn't use that as an excuse to fail to go on and to hurt the whole world. You will end up hurting yourself and wasting your precious time. Don't always think of revenging, just let things go and move on with your life. Remember everything happens for a reason and when one door closes, the other opens for you with new blessings and love.
Hutus didn't plan Tutsi Genocide
Kagame, the mastermind of Rwandan Genocide (Hutu & tutsi)