Rwanda: Cartographie des crimes
Let us remember Our People
You can't stop thinking
Welcome to Home Truths
Everybody Hurts
KAGAME - GENOCIDAIRE
Paul Kagame admits ordering...
Why did Kagame this to me?
Inzira ndende
Search
Hutu Children & their Mums
Rwanda-rebranding
Ways To Get Rid of Kagame
- The people should overthrow the Rwandan dictator (often put in place by foreign agencies) and throw him, along with his henchmen and family, out of the country – e.g., the Shah of Iran, Marcos of Philippines.Compaore of Burkina Faso
- Rwandans organize a violent revolution and have the dictator killed – e.g., Ceaucescu in Romania.
- Foreign powers (till then maintaining the dictator) force the dictator to exile without armed intervention – e.g. Mátyás Rákosi of Hungary was exiled by the Soviets to Kirgizia in 1970 to “seek medical attention”.
- Foreign powers march in and remove the dictator (whom they either instated or helped earlier) – e.g. Saddam Hussein of Iraq or Manuel Noriega of Panama.
- The dictator kills himself in an act of desperation – e.g., Hitler in 1945.
- The dictator is assassinated by people near him – e.g., Julius Caesar of Rome in 44 AD was stabbed by 60-70 people (only one wound was fatal though).
- Organise strikes and unrest to paralyze the country and convince even the army not to support the dictaor – e.g., Jorge Ubico y Castañeda was ousted in Guatemala in 1944 and Guatemala became democratic, Recedntly in Burkina Faso with the dictator Blaise Compaoré.
Almighty God :Justice for US
Killing Hutus on daily basis
RPF Trade Mark: Akandoya
Fighting For Our Freedom?
KAGAME VS JUSTICE
the 👉"RPF Killing Machine"👈
Professors Allan Stam and Christian Davenport have contributed significantly to the discourse on the Rwandan Genocide through their research and analysis, challenging widely accepted narratives, particularly those associated with Rwandan President Paul Kagame's government. Here are key points summarizing their work and achievements:
Critical Examination of Genocide Narratives:
- Stam and Davenport scrutinized the dominant narrative that the genocide was solely a Tutsi victimization perpetrated by Hutu extremists. Their findings suggested a more complex picture, including significant atrocities committed by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) under Kagame’s leadership.
Data-Driven Analysis:
- The researchers utilized extensive datasets, including casualty estimates, migration patterns, and testimonies, to assess the scale and scope of violence. They concluded that the official narrative may underreport millions of victim groups, such as Hutu and domestic Tutsi civilians beginning with intellectual Hutus, children and wifes killed by the RPF before October 1, 1990, during and after 1994, the official Rwandan genocide.
Challenge to Politically Motivated Histories:
- Their work highlights how post-genocide narratives can be shaped by political agendas. Kagame’s government has been accused of using the genocide narrative as a tool for political legitimacy, consolidating power, and justifying repressive policies.
Expanding Accountability:
- Stam and Davenport argue for a broader view of justice that accounts for all atrocities committed during the conflict, regardless of perpetrator or victim identity. This includes holding the RPF accountable for its actions.
Influence on Genocide Studies:
- By questioning the completeness of the prevailing narrative, their work has inspired a reevaluation of the Rwandan Genocide in academic and policy-making circles. This has fostered debates about the ethics of memory, justice, and reconciliation.
Controversy and Pushback:
- Their findings have been met with resistance, particularly from the Rwandan government, which vehemently defends its version of events. Critics have accused Stam and Davenport of diminishing the severity of the genocide against the Tutsi, though the scholars maintain their aim is to uncover the Truth in its entirety about the RWANDAN GENOCIDE.
Through their work, Stam and Davenport have significantly broadened the understanding of the Rwandan Genocide, emphasizing the need for nuanced and comprehensive perspectives in historical and political analysis. Their research underscores the complexity of mass violence and the dangers of one-sided historical narratives.
Professors Allan Stam and Christian Davenport's work critically examines the Rwandan Genocide and explicitly challenges the dominant narrative endorsed by Paul Kagame and his government, often amplified by Western media. Their research reveals the role of Kagame and the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) in acts of mass violence that, they argue, necessitate a thorough reassessment of the genocide's accepted history. Key points from their findings include:RPF’s Role in Widespread Atrocities:
- Stam and Davenport’s data shows that the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), under Kagame’s leadership, was responsible for significant killings during and after the genocide. These killings targeted Hutu civilians and other perceived enemies under the guise of ending the genocide and establishing order.
- Their research estimates that the RPF may have been directly or indirectly responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths, highlighting the need to broaden accountability beyond the Hutu extremists traditionally blamed for the genocide.
Manipulation of the Genocide Narrative:
- Kagame's government, according to Stam and Davenport, has carefully curated the genocide narrative to position itself as the savior of the Tutsi and as the sole legitimate authority in Rwanda. This narrative minimizes or obscures the RPF's responsibility for large-scale atrocities, thus consolidating Kagame’s political power domestically and internationally.
Western Media and International Complicity:
- The researchers argue that Western media and governments have uncritically accepted and propagated the RPF's version of events. This has allowed Kagame’s regime to escape scrutiny for its actions, even as it continues to suppress dissent, curtail freedoms, and engage in violence both within Rwanda and in neighboring countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Revisiting Victimhood and Perpetration:
- Stam and Davenport challenge the binary framing of the genocide as Tutsi victims versus Hutu perpetrators. Their findings suggest a more complex reality where the RPF also engaged in systematic killings and human rights abuses, contradicting the widely held belief that Kagame’s forces were solely liberators.
Implications for Justice and Accountability:
- The scholars assert that true justice and reconciliation in Rwanda require acknowledging all victims and perpetrators, including crimes committed by the RPF KILLING MACHINE. TThey criticize the international community’s selective focus, which has allowed Kagame’s government to escape accountability for its horrific actions and relentless pursuit of power by any means necessary.
Call to Rethink The Rwandan Genocide by ending Kagame and his allies' narrative:
- Stam and Davenport emphasize that the genocide's history must be reexamined in light of their findings. They argue that the uncritical acceptance of Kagame’s narrative by Western media and academia has hindered a full understanding of the events and perpetuated a one-sided account that serves political interests.
Conclusion
They emphasize that without real and effective sanctions against Paul Kagame, his RPF killing machine, and the network of think tanks, allies, and pro-Kagame media spreading propaganda, Kagame will continue to evade accountability for his atrocities. The international community’s failure to act decisively has allowed Kagame to maintain his grip on power, using fear, violence, and misinformation to suppress dissent and obscure the full extent of his regime's crimes.
The researchers argue that as long as Kagame faces no genuine consequences, he will remain at large, shielded by a web of complicity and propaganda, instead of being arrested and brought before the bar of justice. They call for urgent international action to dismantle this system of impunity and hold Kagame and his enablers accountable for their ruthless pursuit of power and the horrific actions perpetrated under his leadership.
Stam and Davenport’s groundbreaking research unequivocally identifies the RPF, under Kagame’s leadership, as a "killing machine" that engaged in extensive violence against civilians. Their findings challenge the mainstream narrative of the Rwandan Genocide as propagated by Kagame and supported by Western media, demanding a comprehensive reassessment of the events to ensure accountability and a truthful historical record. This work underscores the importance of questioning politically motivated histories and broadening the scope of justice for all victims of violence.
The global community must confront an alarming failure in international justice: the inability to hold Paul Kagame, leader of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), accountable for credible allegations of torture, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide committed against the majority Hutus and domestic Tutsis under his command before, during and after the 1994 Rwandan genocide onwards. This document evaluates the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’s (ICTR) shortcomings, examines mounting evidence of RPF unspeacable atrocities, and calls for urgent intervention to address impunity and uphold international law.
The ICTR’s Shortcomings and the Case for Accountability
The ICTR, established to prosecute those responsible for crimes committed during the Rwandan genocide, has faced widespread criticism for its selective justice. While it prosecuted members of the genocidal Hutu regime, it failed to address atrocities committed by the RPF. Political expediency and Kagame’s strategic cooperation with the tribunal shielded him and his associates from scrutiny.
The ICTR Statute enshrined the doctrine of command responsibility, which holds leaders accountable for crimes committed by their subordinates if they knew or should have known about the acts and failed to prevent or punish them. Despite abundant evidence implicating Kagame, the tribunal neglected its mandate, undermining its credibility and perpetuating perceptions of victor’s justice.
Documented Atrocities by the RPF
Numerous reports, testimonies, and investigations detail the RPF’s involvement in widespread and systematic violence:
The Gersony Report: Commissioned by the UN, it documented mass killings of Hutu civilians by the RPF during and after the genocide. Thousands were lured into peace meetings only to be executed.
The DRC Mapping Report: Published by the UN, this report highlighted atrocities committed by RPF forces during cross-border operations, including massacres, disappearances, and mass graves in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Scholarly Accounts: Researchers such as Judi Rever (In Praise of Blood), Dr. Charles Onana, Professor Bernard Lugan, and journalist Pierre Péan (Noires Fureurs, Blancs Menteurs) have revealed the RPF’s role in instigating violence, including the assassination of President Juvénal Habyarimana—the event that catalyzed the genocide. They have also documented crimes such as torture, mass rape, arbitrary executions, forced disappearances, and the trafficking of human organs targeting Hutu civilians.
Former RPF Insiders: High-ranking RPF defectors have disclosed the group’s deliberate targeting of Hutu civilians, systematic ethnic cleansing, and manipulation of casualty narratives to legitimize its power consolidation.
These findings implicate Kagame in overseeing a “killing machine” that has operated with impunity for decades, committing crimes of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity on a massive scale.
Western Complicity and Media Bias
Western nations’ geopolitical interests have significantly influenced the narrative surrounding the Rwandan genocide. The United States and the United Kingdom, viewing Kagame as a stabilizing ally in Central Africa, provided diplomatic and financial support to his regime. This alliance suppressed scrutiny of RPF crimes, framing Kagame as a liberator while ignoring credible evidence of his forces’ atrocities. The media, too, largely propagated a one-sided narrative, focusing on Hutu-perpetrated violence while neglecting the RPF’s role in perpetuating ethnic conflict and mass killings.
The Titanic Contributions of Courageous Researchers and Witnesses
A growing body of evidence has been unearthed thanks to the tireless efforts of researchers, journalists, and human rights defenders who have courageously exposed RPF crimes. These include:
Professor Allan Stam and Professor Christian Davenport: Their groundbreaking studies challenge the mainstream narrative of the Rwandan genocide, highlighting the complexity of events and the RPF’s culpability.
Dr. Charles Onana: Renowned for his investigations into Rwandan and Congolese genocides.
Pierre Péan: A journalist whose meticulous work revealed the systematic crimes committed by Kagame’s regime.
Judi Rever: Her investigative journalism in In Praise of Blood exposed the depth of RPF atrocities against Hutu civilians.
Professor Christopher Black: An international criminal lawyer who has persistently criticized the ICTR’s selective prosecution and documented RPF atrocities.
Aloys Ruyenzi and other RPF defectors: Whistleblowers who have risked their lives to reveal the truth about Kagame’s regime.
Dr. Matata Joseph and the Committee for the Liberation of Rwanda (CLIIR): Advocating for justice and exposing the hunting of Hutu intellectuals and systematic abuses worldwide.
These contributions, alongside testimonies from survivors and eye-witnesses, have built an irrefutable case against Kagame and his RPF machine.
The Broader Consequences of Selective Justice
The ICTR’s failure to prosecute Kagame undermines the principles of international criminal law and emboldens other leaders to evade accountability. This selective justice denies recognition and redress to victims of RPF crimes, perpetuating cycles of violence and impunity in Rwanda and the Great Lakes region. Kagame’s authoritarian regime continues to suppress dissent, enforce a monolithic historical narrative, and stifle reconciliation efforts.
The Call for Action
Renewed Investigations: International bodies, including the International Criminal Court (ICC), must investigate and prosecute Kagame and his associates for alleged crimes against humanity. The ICTR’s closure does not absolve the international community of its responsibility to seek justice.
Empowering Whistleblowers: Testimonies from former RPF members, such as Aloys Ruyenzi, must be safeguarded and amplified to provide a comprehensive understanding of RPF atrocities.
Demanding Transparency: Suppressed documents, including the Gersony Report and classified communications, should be declassified and made publicly accessible to expose the full extent of RPF’s crimes.
Addressing Western Complicity: Western nations must acknowledge their role in enabling Kagame’s impunity and support efforts to ensure accountability.
Independent Historical Revision: The international community should support impartial research into the Rwandan genocide to challenge propaganda and reveal a balanced narrative.
A Survivor’s Testimony and Call for Global Support
As a multilingual Rwandan Hutu intellectual, survivor, and eye-witness to unspeakable crimes committed by the RPF, I urge the world to act. My family members, along with countless others, have suffered immensely under Kagame’s reign. The time has come for the international community to stand with survivors and expose the truth. Videos, testimonies, and irrefutable evidence are available to support this call for justice.
Conclusion
The international community has a moral and legal obligation to challenge the impunity surrounding Kagame and the RPF. Prosecuting Kagame would not only honor the memory of millions of victims but also reinforce the principles of impartial justice and the rule of law. This accountability is essential for healing, reconciliation, and the prevention of future atrocities in Rwanda and beyond.
The time to act is now. The voices of survivors, whistleblowers, and human rights defenders demand urgent intervention. The world must unite to end decades of silence and hold Kagame and his RPF machine accountable for their unspeakable crimes.
Profile
Genocide masterminded by RPF
Human and Civil Rights
Rwanda: A mapping of crimes
KIBEHO: Rwandan Auschwitz
Mass murderers C. Sankara
Stephen Sackur’s Hard Talk.
Prof. Allan C. Stam
Prof. Christian Davenport
The killing Fields - Part 1
The killing Fields - Part II
Daily bread for Rwandans
The killing Fields - Part III
Time has come: Regime change
Drame rwandais- justice impartiale
Sheltering 2,5 million refugees
Latest videos
Rwanda's Untold Story
Rwanda, un génocide en questions
Bernard Lugan présente "Rwanda, un génocide en... par BernardLugan Bernard Lugan présente "Rwanda, un génocide en questions"
Nombre de Visiteurs
Pages
- Donate - Support us
- 1994 MASSACRES IN RWANDA WERE NOT GENOCIDE ACCOR...
- Les massacres du Rwanda 20 plus tard. À la recherc...
- About African survivors International
- Congo Genocide
- Twenty Years Ago, The US was Behind the Genocide: Rwanda, Installing a US Proxy State in Central Africa
- Rwanda Genocide
- Our work
Popular Posts - Last 7 days
-
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand,...
-
Contacts:: Kitty Kurth, Hotel Rwanda Rusesabagina Foundation 312-617-7288 Friends of the Congo 202-584-6512 Africa Faith and Justice N...
-
By Jean-Christophe Nizeyimana, The Truth-Telle r [Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the...
-
03-01-2010 posted by Ann Garrison Harsh anti-gay legislation proposed in both Uganda and Rwanda has turned more Western attention to E...
-
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tut...
-
Tension entre militaires burundais et rwandais à la frontière nord Twenty years after the pivotal events of 1994 , it is time ...
-
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule with an iron hand, ty...
-
[Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying reality : the Tutsi minority (14%) ethnic domination, the Tutsi minority ethnic rule, ty...
-
by Corbett | May 28, 2024 | Podcasts , Videos | 46 comments [Since 1994, the world witnesses the horrifying Tutsi minority (14%) eth...
-
The blog of African Survivors International is like a library or a public park where we can all go to think, learn and g...
0 comments:
Post a Comment